Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00150
Original file (FD-2009-00150.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE
|) SOUNSER © | wane OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
YES Ne
Xx

 

 

MEMBER SITTING

    
 
  

ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER AGRO
A01.00

 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

   
  
  
   
  
  

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

Xx RECORD REVIEW

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

UOTHC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCIIARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

Beir

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

  
 
 

FD-2009-00150
ees

a

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

application to the AFBCMR.

 

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

ou NDORSEMENT

 

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

  
  

 

 

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the nght to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, IRD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (FF-V2)

Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

FD-2009-00150

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds the applicant submitted no
issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the
Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of her discharge. The
applicant does submit that since her discharge she has held a steady job and learned from her mistakes and
that she believes an upgrade in discharge will help her in her daily life to find better employment. The
record indicates the applicant received one Article 15 and one Letter of Reprimand during the 14 months she
served on active duty. Her misconduct included drinking while under the legal age of 21, allowing other
minors to store and consume alcoholic beverages in her Air Force issued dormitory room, and soliciting
another Air Force member to purchase alcohol for individuals who were under the age of 21. The Board
opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her
behavior. They found the seriousness and repetitiveness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects
of the applicant's duty performance. In addition, while the DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was
doing well since leaving the Air Force and has maintained steady employment, it found no inequity or
impropriety in her discharge to warrant an upgrade of the discharge. The Board concluded the misconduct
of the applicant appropriately characterized her term of service.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2007-00404

    Original file (FD2007-00404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN = TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Bea oe MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER | DENY — xX x x x x 7 =e ISSUES A92.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee : E t 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00376

    Original file (FD-2010-00376.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00055

    Original file (FD-2009-00055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD REVIE' ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL UOTHC - T x ~ - - T x xX Xx t- Xx ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A93.01 A67.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER Of NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE 17 Jun 2010 CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00055 ee Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. The Board...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00375

    Original file (FD-2010-00375.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW ' NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER DENY ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A47.00 ee ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00065

    Original file (FD-2009-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code hears REE TO: a : #8 ee ae ie a SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 INDORSE ME Doe persmany FROM: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR, REVIEW OF DISCHARGE de | OE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00188

    Original file (FD-2009-00188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    VOTE OF THE BOARD iis MEMBER SITTING | HON | GEN UOTHC OTHER | DENY x x x xX - T x 2 5, se * r NAT a TEES Te rary LT ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 oo : EXTIEBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ds A92,21 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ; 4 |BRIRF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PFRSONAL APPEARANCE ‘TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE : CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00403

    Original file (FD-2008-00403.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. After a review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in her three years of service she was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00239

    Original file (FD2008-00239.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE ~GEN | _ PERSONAL APPEARANCE i x | RECORD REVIEW < ) 4) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No xX MEMBER SITTING ISSUES A01.13 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD | TADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...