AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
aida OUNSEL 0) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES
X
| VOTEOF THE BOARD
[oie Samed a | out det adr ind
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
x
x
X
x
ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.30 EXHIBECS: SUBMITED: TO THE BOARD
1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO ‘THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMIFTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
05 Aug 2010 FD-2009-00138
APPLICANT: SUBARD THE BOARD’S DECISIONAL; RATONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED ATR FORCE DECHS E REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE: |
aE
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
eT
NT DALE: S/LS/2ULU
TO: FROM:
> SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAP/MRBR ee AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
930 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00138
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Although not explicitly stated, applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He
contends there were no grounds during the Special Court Martial to warrant a General discharge. The
records indicated the applicant had a Special Court Martial for writing checks with insufficient funds in his
account and failure to maintain funds in his account. He was punished with a reduction in rank to Airman
Basic and confinement. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed
the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by
the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00142
THE ATTACHED AIR LORCE DISCHARGE REV EW SOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00138
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetohonorableTheapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthedischarge.ISSUE: Applicantreceiveda...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00177
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied. Issue 2, Applicant contends the Board should take into account his post-service activities. However, the DRB opined that there was no relationship between the applicant’s illness and his misconduct and concluded the characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00174
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ITEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW eo COUNSEL: “eo NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION «| ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL _ oe y 8 Oo) MOTEORTHE BOARD 0 HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x x x x eee x —— ipercnnonres - o- aS = EDS ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 : a cee [BITS SUBMITTED TO TH A92.00 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00138
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH AlC) 1. For this incident, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 15 Nov 04. e. On 18 Aug 04, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the time prescribed. Documents containing derogatory information -- which are not listed in the notification memorandum as the basis for discharge: None 3.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00126
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EE-V2)_ Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00126 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00404
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN a SRA _ TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ” VOTE OF THE BOARD : GEN UOTHC OTHER ‘DENY x x Xx Xx x | issues A203. 2~Ot*~*«
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00303
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x r - x r — X xX x ISSUES INDEX NUMBER ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00638
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,tochangethereasonandauthorityfordischarge,...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.