Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00138
Original file (FD-2014-00138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE



X        RECORD REVIEW

AFSN/SSAN


ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER

DENY
x
x x x x

A68.00

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LEITER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE    CASE NVMBER

28Aug 2014       FD-2014-00138

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.











SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PEllSONNEL COUNOL AIR FORCE DISCltARGE REVIEW BOARD 15)5COMMAND 1)11,EE WING, JRD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB,MD?t76Z.7'01


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00138

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received a Bad Conduct Discharge by Special Court Martial Conviction

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.

The Board finds that because the applicant did not receive an administrative discharge, his contention of inequity is not applicable. The applicant received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a punitive discharge, as part of his sentence resulting from a Special Court-Martial conviction. Under the provisions of Section 1553, 10 USC, the only basis for a change of a Bad Conduct discharge is clemency. The applicant did not present any evidence which the DRB could warrant granting clemency.

Ifthe applicant can provide documented information to support a post service conduct which includes but is not is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children's birth certificate (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of character non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; and documentation of a drug free lifestyle, the Board highly recommends that applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. The applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee clemency, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post­ service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member's overall character.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00134

    Original file (FD-2013-00134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeservicecharacterizationtoanhonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withcounsel, atAndrewsAFBon20February2014.Thefollowingwitnessalsotestifiedontheapplicant'sbehalf: Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00138

    Original file (FD-2009-00138.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW aida OUNSEL 0) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES X | VOTEOF THE BOARD [oie Samed a | out det adr ind HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x X x ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.30 EXHIBECS: SUBMITED: TO THE BOARD 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00780

    Original file (FD-2014-00780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00468

    Original file (FD-2014-00468.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00781

    Original file (FD-2013-00781.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgrade ofdischargetohonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearance beforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00711

    Original file (FD-2014-00711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoGeneral. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00683

    Original file (FD-2013-00683.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW BOARDHEARINGRECORDNAM£OF SERVICEMEMBER{LAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEONAL APPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADDRESSANDOR ORGANIZATON OFCQUNSEL. ----- _,....,.. ..-·...·-A68.00 HON GEN UOTHC OTHER 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOF DISCHARGELETTER OFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENIJM8£R13 Mar2014 FD-2013-00683 - -...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00762

    Original file (FD-2013-00762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORD NAME OFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL) GRADEAFSN/SSANX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGAN!l.ATION OF COUNSELMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENYORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASE TO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITS SUDMITfEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENllMllER01May2014 FD-2013-00762 1 • • ' > •',:1 • •,• •t...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00104

    Original file (FD-2014-00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailable servicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00104

    Original file (FD 2014 00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailable servicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.