Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00638
Original file (FD-2013-00638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)      GRADE


X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

GEN      UOTHC

OTHER    DENY
X*+ X*+ X*+
X*+




A92.35 A94.55

INDEX NUMBER     A47.00



ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X*+

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE    CASE NUMBER

05 Feb 2014

FD-2013-00638


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.

*Narrative Reason and Authority
+RE Code








TO:

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742
FROM:

SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR fORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20162-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00638

GENERAL:         The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change the reenlistment code is denied.

ISSUE: Applicant received a general discharge for Failure to Meet Financial Obligations

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident. The records indicated the applicant's misconduct included inappropriately used her government travel card (GTC) to make personal purchases in excess of $4000.00 between March and May 2009, failed to maintain sufficient funds to cover two checks, and mismanaged her personal finance in regards to renting furniture during 2009. Additionally, the applicant received two Letters of Reprimand and one Record of individual Counseling for failure to pay GTC debt. After a complete and thorough review of the records and the evidence submitted by the applicant, the Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the
positive contributions she made in her Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00658

    Original file (FD-2013-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA92.21A92.0lINDEXNUMBERA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUM8ER05Feb2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00765

    Original file (FD-2013-00765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgrade ofdischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completed basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00042

    Original file (FD-2014-00042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableandtochangethereasonforthedischarge.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeandchangeofreasonaredenied.ISSUE: Theapplicantwasgivenageneraldischargefor misconduct--...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00134

    Original file (FD-2014-00134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischarge tohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00139

    Original file (FD-2014-00139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00227

    Original file (FD-2014-00227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTl\UDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSANPERSONALAPPEARANCE X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATION OFCOUNSELMEMBERSITIINGHON GEN UOTHC OTHERISSUESA94.11 A92.0lINDEXNOMBERA67.501ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROF NOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASE TOTiffi BOARDADDmONALEXHffiITSSUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAIUNGDATE CASENUMBER04Sep...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00415

    Original file (FD-2009-00415.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW “ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES xX MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x x > ISSUES A92.15 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 eee ee SL ES BUN 494.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 {BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00401_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00401_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDT,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSANONALAPPEARANCE X RECORDREVIEWADORESS AJllDORORCAJ\llZATION OFCOUNSEL x (b)(6) (b) (6) MEMBERSIISSUES A94.SS INDEX NUMBERAS9.001ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEW OFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONAL EXHIBITSSUBMITTEDAT TIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGH£ARINC DATE03Oct 2013CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00453_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00453_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoardrequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,tochangethereasonandauthorityfor...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00544

    Original file (FD-2014-00544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable,tochangethereasonandauthority forthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard request...