AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
: NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ an — ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING HON voTNc OTHER DENY
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER
A9S.00
A67.90 | 2) BEXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOA
A01.00 |1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE __
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
ITEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-001.06
ERO DEANNA ARE DISCUSSED ON THE AIACHE
a ee ee ue nee a
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
RONALD,
DAI FORCE DISCHARGE VIEW BOARD DECEIONAL E
ae Coe
me
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
TO: : FROM:
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
ween a AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MI) 20762-7001
AFHOQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE ” FD-2009-00106
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does
submit that he believes he deserves a second chance despite his discrepancies so that he may serve his
country in the South Carolina Air National Guard. The record indicates the applicant received an Article 15
and a Summary Court Martial. His misconduct included failure to go and driving under the influence of
alcohol. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities
to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of
the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of
impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00098
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Therefore the Board finds no inequity or impropriety in the processing of the discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00152
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO TILE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 14 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00152 ‘ABELICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARDS DECISIONAL: RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED ATR FORCE DING ree ee SS ae Biel nos LARGE BEVIEW-BOARG DECISION! The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00022
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE Amn TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW AFSN/SSAN nee Hs ie : : eu | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL 8 TE OF THE BOARI MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER ISSUES A01.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 495.00 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00134
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15s, three Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling and three Records of Individual Counseling. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00133
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW >) COUNSEL °.."''| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN “UO” THC OTHER X Xx x x x ISSUES A94 00 UNG A UVEEE A67 10 d ae a EXHIBITS SUBMITT ED TO THE THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00064
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00039
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSN/SSAN ae MEMBER SITTING UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x x x aa — re a ; “SURMELTED GO ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 ao as SUBMITTED £0. Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00149
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X | RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL OTHER DENY x x xX x x | ISSUES A931 I INDEX NUMBER A67.90 E ! The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00181
7/22/2010 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, IRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 Previous CASE NUMBER / AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00181 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00006
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. ISSUE: Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.