Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00098
Original file (FD-2009-00098.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
— ~ e VOTE OF THEBOARD
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
X
X
m
x
ISSUES AQI .00 INDEX NUMBER A94.07
A95.00 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD oe
20 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3_|LETPER OF NOTIFICATION oe
[4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
05 Aug 2010 FD-2009-00098

 

 

 

ibs

APPLICANT “SISSUE aNoT REDOARD'S DECISIONAL:

   

AALE ‘ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL a
Ges hee ee ee

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

   
   

= , Lo
fake SRLS TRS Re INDORSEMENT. co falda ws vicctatinc das. MLUZOL aa
To: FROM: ‘ ‘
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SA FIMEDE. wr ch: fee AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREEF1 ‘Fl, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB/T X 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00098

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of

discharge.
ISSUE:

Issue 1. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. Applicant
was accused of raping AIC KLC and unlawfully entering a dormitory room with intent to commit a criminal
offense. The applicant submitted to the Discharge Review Board a copy of the Article 32 Investigating
Officer’s Report dated April 7, 2008. That report recommended trial by general court martial of all charges
and specifications. The Board notes that applicant requested a Chapter 4 discharge in lieu of trial by court
martial, a request that was granted. Therefore the Board finds no inequity or impropriety in the processing
of the discharge and finds the characterization of service appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00098

    Original file (FD-2015-00098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforUnsatisfactoryPerformanceThe AirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underits...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00463

    Original file (FD-2008-00463.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    / NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL “ NOTHOPTHEBOARD) = HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x¥+ Met xA+ e+ Xt ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a EXTUBIT SSUBMITTED tO "TE (RD me A93.11 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00152

    Original file (FD-2009-00152.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO TILE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 14 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00152 ‘ABELICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARDS DECISIONAL: RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED ATR FORCE DING ree ee SS ae Biel nos LARGE BEVIEW-BOARG DECISION! The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00426

    Original file (FD-2008-00426.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code FROM: TO: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL SAEMRB z on AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00426 GENERAL: The applicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00039

    Original file (FD-2009-00039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSN/SSAN ae MEMBER SITTING UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x x x aa — re a ; “SURMELTED GO ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 ao as SUBMITTED £0. Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00441

    Original file (FD-2008-00441.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his three years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00038

    Original file (FD-2009-00038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC _ TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE Xx RECORD REVIEW | 2] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL application to the AFBCMR. 8 OR IA LEST LY, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00575

    Original file (FD-2008-00575.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN _ AMN TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW BOUNSEL™ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL — a VOTE.OF HON GEN UOTHC xe XFL X*4 xe+ xe ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER 67.90 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD HES? The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00097

    Original file (FD-2009-00097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN SRA a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Ree NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ESET VOTE OF THE BOARD. a

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00052

    Original file (FD-2009-00052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL PERE es ce ee Oe HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x xX INDEX NUMBER ISSUES 494.05 A67.10 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00052 application to the AFBCMR. AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) i SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535...