AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE
Amn
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
AFSN/SSAN
nee Hs ie
: : eu | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
8
TE OF THE BOARI
MEMBER SITTING
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER
ISSUES
A01.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
495.00
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
Blob fee Pe
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
10 Mar 2010 FD-2009-00022
ak,
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
SECRETARY OF THE AJR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAF/MRBR
ee AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
§50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00022
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The applicant was offered a
personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be
completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues of inequity or impropriety. The record indicates the applicant
received one Article 15, one vacation action (of Article 15), three Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of
Counseling, and one Letter of Admonishment. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits
as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a
statement (DD Form 2366, on September 14, 2005) that he understood he must receive an Honorable
discharge to receive future educational entitlements. Based on a thorough review of applicants medical and
personnel records, the Board did not find a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an
upgrade. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all
military members, The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be
appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00463
/ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL “ NOTHOPTHEBOARD) = HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x¥+ Met xA+ e+ Xt ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a EXTUBIT SSUBMITTED tO "TE (RD me A93.11 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00134
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15s, three Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling and three Records of Individual Counseling. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00471
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL The American Legion . ~ see ee ees MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ L — _ | —__| [ xt X*t+ X*+ ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION (a BRIEF OF...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00597
[LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ee 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 19 Feb 2010 FD-2008-00597 SSSUE AND a cae Case heard i in Washington, D.C, FORGE PGES. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING:...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530
OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00330
A93.01 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIGF OF PERSONNEL FII.E __ COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER , 10 Aug 2010 FD-2008-00330 s at HEANT S ISSUE ANI THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL Ky Case heard in Washington, D.C via video-teleconference from Randolph AFB, Texas. nen: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00203
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X Xx X X ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee A I ae 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00375
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW ' NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER DENY ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A47.00 ee ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00756
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x = x x x ISSUES A94, 1 1 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE | |TAPE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.