Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00448
Original file (FD2005-00448.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD 

1 
I 

I  APSNISSAN 
1  ! 
---------------- 
'-..-..-..-..-..: 
--  -- 

-- 

- 

I 
1  NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 
........................ 
'-..-..-..-..-..-..----! 
'TYPE  HON 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

' 

' 

'OUBXIL 

YES 

' 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OH OHCANILA l l O N  

No 

X 

.............................................. 

I 

ISSUES 

A95.00 

INDEX NUMBER 

A13.00 

I  GRADE 
AMN 

"-  - 

RECORD HEVlEW 

X 
AUUHhbb ANU 011 OIIGANILA I ION 0b COllNbhL 

X*+ 

X*+ 

X*+ 

X*+ 

X*+ 

Kxwlarn SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 

1  I  ORDER APPOIN'I'ING  1.1 I
2  1  APPLICATION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 

 HOARD 

t

IlEARlNC DATE 

CASE NUMBER 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 

COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE UOAKD 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL  APPEAKANCF. Ilk 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an 
application to the AFBCMR 
1  Names and votes will  be made available to the applicant at the applicant's  request. 
*  Reason and Authority 
+ RE Code 

550 C'  s TREE7  WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLI'H  AFB,  I'X  781 50-4742 

SECRETARY  OF TllE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL 
AIR FORCE DISCIIARCE REVIEW BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WlNC.3RD FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20761.7002 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

('4SE N I  MBER 

FD-200s-00448 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for a change of reenlistment code and change of reason and authority 
for the discharge. 

The applicant was offered a personal  appearance before the Discharge Review Board  (DRB) but declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Request for change of reenlistment code and change of reason and authority  for discharge are 
denied. 

The  Board  finds  that  neither  the  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  the  applicant  substantiates  an 
inequity or impropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

ISSUE: 

Applicant has requested a change of the reenlistment  code and change of the reason and authority for his 
discharge.  He contends that his ability to do his job was not affected by his weight.  The records indicated 
the applicant received  six Letters of Reprimand and a Letter of Counseling for failure to meet the Air Force 
weight standards.  The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample 
opportunities to change his negative behavior.  The Board concluded the reenlistment code and reason and 
authority for the discharge received by the applicant were found to be appropriate. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive  requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of  the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided  full administrative due process. 

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

(Former AMN)  (HGH AlC) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rectd a HON Disch fr USAF Grand Forks AFB, ND on 
24 Aug 9 4   UP AFR 39-10, para 5-62 (Failure in Weight Management Program). 
Appeals for a Change in RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 30 Dec 71.  Enlmt Age: 18 5/12.  Disch Age: 22 7/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A,  A-79,  E-38,  G-44,  M-28. PAFSC: 3P051 -  Security Journeyman. 
DAS: 1 Jul 94. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 26 Jun 90 -  2 Dec 9 0   (5 months 7 days)(Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 3 Dec 90 for 4 yrs. Svd: 03 Yrs 08 Mo 22 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  A m  -  5 Jul 94 (Demotion, SO# A-007, 14 Jul 94) 

A1C -  3 Apr 92 
A m  -  Unknown 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15's:  None. 

e.  Additional: AF FORM 393, 28 JUL 94 -  Failed to make satisfactory 

LOR, 16 MAY 9 4   -  Failed to make satisfactory progress in 

the Weight Management Program. 

progress in the Weight Management 
Program. 

LOR/CR, 28 DEC 9 3   -  Failed to make satisfactory progress 

LOR/UIF, 21 OCT 93 -  Failed to make satisfactory progress 

in the Weight Management Program. 

LOR, 17 SEP 93 -  Failed to make satisfactory progress in 

in the Weight Management Program. 

the Weight Management Program. 

LOR/UIF, 2 OCT 91 -  Financial irresponsibility and lying. 
RIC, 25 SEP 91 -  Financial irresponsibility* 
LOR, 21 MAY 91 -  Failure to obey a lawful order. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g *  Record of SV: 3 Dec 9 0   -  2 Aug 92  Grand Forks AFB  3  (~nitial) 

3 Aug 9 2   -  4 Apr 93  Grand Forks AFB  4  (CRO) 
5 Apr 93  -  4 Apr 94  Grand Forks AFB  3  (Annual) 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS: (04) Yrs  (01) Mos  ( 2 9 )   Das 
TAMS: (03) Yrs  ( 0 8 )   Mos  (22) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Frn  2 9 3 )   dtd 14 Nov 05. 

(Change Discharge to the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) 

Issue 1:  Upgrade to say Secretarial Authority.  Also request to have and 

(sic) RE Code upgrade.  I believe my ability to do my job while in the service 
was not effected.  Also, the reason for the RE Code upgrade -  future military 
duty or governmental job. 

ATCH 
None. 

i 

I 

I 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FOR 
~ W U A K I Z N 8 3 l Y I H  AlR REFlJEUNG W W Q W  
G W D  FORKS AIR FOIICII BAS& NORTH DAKOTA 

b 

.---------------------------------------- 

M E M O W U M  FOR Amni ----------------------------------------, 
FROM: 448 MSICC 

SUBJECT: Notification Letter 

1. I am recornmending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure in the 
weight control program.  The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-62.  If 
my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable. 

2.  My reasons for this action are: 

a.  You failed, on or about 28 Jul94, to make satisfactory progress in the weight 

management program as is reflected by AF Form 3 93. 

b.  You failed, on or about 13 May 94, to make satisfactory progress in the weight 

management program for which you received a LOR dated 16 May 94. 

c.  You failed, on or about 27 Dec 94, to make satisfactory progress in the weight 

management program, for which you received a LOR dated 28 Dec 93.  Additionally you 
were place on the Control Roster. 

d.  You failed, on or about 21 Oct 93, to make satisfactory progress in the weight 

management program,  for which you received a LOR/UIF dated 21 Oct 93. 

e.  You failed, on or about 17 Sep 93, to make satisfactory progressin the weight 

management program, for which you received a LOR dated 17 Sep 93. 

Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support ofthis 
recommendation are attached.  The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and if 
you are discharged, how your service will be characterized.  If you are discharged, you 
will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. 

3.  You have the right to consult counsel.  Military legal counsel has been obtained to 
assist you,  You have been scheduled an appointment at the Office of the Area Defense 
Counsel at Building 216 on  E R 1.46 9 Y  
civilian counsel at your own expense. 

hours,  You may consult 
~

at  1

3

 

4.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf  Any  statements you want 
the separation authority to consider must reach me by  /Q AU6 97  at  1 b30  hours 
unless you request' and receive an extension for good cause shown.  I will send them to the 
separation authority. 

5.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure 
will constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

6. You have been scheduled for a medical examination,  You must report to the 3 19th 
Medical Group on /O  8 ~ 6  PL/ 

at #730 hours for the examination. 

7.  Deliver to me immediately your military identification card and those of your 
dependents.  I have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFR 30- 
20, paragraph 2-9.  You will report to me by  COB  SIQM ?$' 
of Temporary Identification Card(s) has been accomplished. 

, to verify that issuance 

8.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act 
Statement as explained in AFR 39-10, Atch 2.  A copy of AFR 39-10 is available for your 
use in the squadron orderly room, 

9.  Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately. 

L . - . - . - . - . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r n  

Commander, 448 MS 

5 Attachments: 
1.  Supporting Documents 

a.  AF Form 393 
b.  LOR,  16 May 94 
c.  LOR, 28 Dec 93 
d.  LOWUJf;, 21 Oct 93 
e.  LOR, 17 Sep 93 
f  Administrative Demotion 
g.  AF Form 108 

2.  Other Derogatory Data 
3.  Airman's Acknowledgment 
4.  EPRs 
5.  RIP 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00068

    Original file (FD2004-00068.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DQ EE WLNG, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Her infractions included missing numerous appointments with her On-The-Job Training manager, failing to complete her Career Development Course in a timely manner after indicating to her supervisor on numerous occasions that she was progressing...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00268

    Original file (FD2003-00268.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR 1 I SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0387

    Original file (FD2002-0387.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD02-0387 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. And, he received eight Records of Individual Counseling for reporting for mobility without proper equipment, acting in an unprofessional manner, negligent in the performance of duties, dereliction of duty (twice), late for work (three times), leaving a place of duty without authority, failure to complete assigned duties, and for receiving a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0116

    Original file (FD2002-0116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PEKSUONAL APPEARANCE _| X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION * ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING ae, PT {ISSUES INDEX NUMBER BITS SUBMITE DAR A94.06, A93.10 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE — 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ° 02-08-15 FD2002-0116 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF ™ PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0546

    Original file (FD2002-0546.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His misconduct included two instances of failure to obey lawful orders, two incidents of dereliction of duty, at least two instances of failure to maintain his uniforms and personal hygiene standards, failure to go, failing to follow government vehicle operating instructions resulting in an accident, violating the base visitor sponsorship policy, providing alcoholic beverages to another airman who was under the legal drinking age, and soliciting that airman to make a false statement. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00216

    Original file (FD2003-00216.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2003-00216 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was due to financial negligance (sic), on my behalf. For this offense you received an Article 15 dated 15 Jun 94, with a UIF entry.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0178

    Original file (FD2002-0178.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0178 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0178 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SSGT) (HGH TSGT) 1. FD2002-0178 Specification 2: Did, at Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota, on or about 3 Dec 92, steal lawful currency, of a value of $750.00, the property of the Civilian Distinguished...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00437

    Original file (FD2006-00437.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201, In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The discharge board or, the discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00096

    Original file (FD2004-00096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD~2004~00096 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the characterization of service inequitable. On 15 Mar 95, you received an Article 15 for failing to maintain sufficient funds in your checking account.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00441

    Original file (FD2005-00441.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    \\IL41 1 0 \ O k COL\ltI i MEMBER SITTING llON I VUTE OF THE 'BOAfll) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE YUMBER FD-2005-00441 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. LOR, 31 MAY 0 2 - Dereliction of duty.