p
..
- NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
TYPE
1. P 'OUNS%%
I No
1 YES
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
I
I
] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
GRADE
AFSNISSAN
I
1 X
I
RECORD REVIEW
I
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANLZATION OF COUNSEL
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
HON
I
VOTE OF THE BOARD
GEN
I UOTHC
OTHER
I DENY
1
ISSUES
A95.00
INDEX NUMBER
A67.10
I
HEARING DATE
21 Aug 2003
CASE NUMBER
FD-2003-00268
I
EXHIBITS SUBMlTTED TO THE BOARD
I
I
I
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
1
2
3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE
I
I
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECLSIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATI'ACHFD AlR FORCE DISCHARGE REWEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
1
I
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
FROM:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2003-00268
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of Discharge is denied.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the
available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant received two
Article 15s for failure to go and for being AWOL for 3 days. Additionally, he received three Letters of
Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for being late for work, failing his dorm room inspections, failure
to go and failure to obey an order. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant
had ample opportunities to change his negativelrepetitive behavior. The Board concluded the disciplinary
infractions were a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military members. The Board
found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 27 Sep 94 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-46 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions) . Appeals for Honorable
Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 6 Dec 74. Enlmt Age: 17 3/12. Disch Age: 19 9/12. Educ: HS DIPL
AFQT: N/A. A-95, E-78, G-76, M-70. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Apprentice.
DAS: 16 Dec 92.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 31 Mar 92 - 03 Aug 92 (4 months 4 days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 4 Aug 92 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 1 Mo 24 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB - 21 Sep 94 (Article 15, 21 Sep 94)
A1C - 14 Jun 94
Amn - 04 Feb 93
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 21 Sep 94, Grand Forks AFB, ND - Article 86. You did,
on or about 12 Sep 94, without authority, absent
yourself from your place of duty at which you were
required to be, and did remain so absent until you were
contacted by your First Sergeant, MSgt
about 14 Sep 94. Reduction to AB, forfeiture of $400.00
pay per month for two months. (No appeal) (No
mitigat ion)
on or
(2) 15 Dec 93, Grand Forks AFB, ND - Article 86. You, did,
on or about 1 Dec 93, without authority, fail to go at
the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
Suspended reduction to AB. Forfeiture of $407.00 pay
(in excess of $100.00 suspended), and 30 days extra
duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 31 AUG 94 - Failure to go, failure to obey an order,
LOR, 04 NOV 93 - Failure to go.
LOR, UNDATED - Late for work for the third time in three
and failed dorm room inspection.
LOC, UNDATED - Late for work and failed dorm room
months .
inspection.
LOCI UNDATED - Late for work and failed dorm room
inspection.
f. CM: None
g. Record of SV: 4 Aug 92 - 3 Apr 94 Grand Forks AFB 2 (1nitial)REF
isch charged from Grand Forks AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFAM, NDSM, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (2) Yrs (5) Mos (28) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (1) Mos (24) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REXIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 29 May 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 319TkI AIR REFUELING WING (AMC)
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
7 SEP 1994
FROM: 32 1 OSS/CC
-
SUBJECT: Notification Letter
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States A r Force for minor
disciplinary infractions. The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-46. If my
recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or general. I
am recommending that your service be characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. You did, on or about 29 Aug 94, disobey a lawhl order and you failed your
dormitory room inspection. For these actions you received a LOR/UIF dated 3 1 Aug 94.
b. You did, on or about 1 Dec 93, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed
place of duty, for which you received a Article 15, dated 15 Dec 93.
c. You did, on or about 27 Oct 93, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed
place of duty, for which you received a LORJUIF, dated 4 Nov 93.
d. You did, on or about 25 Aug 93, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed
place of duty as well as fail to comply with AFR 35-10, for which a LOR was
accomplished.
e. You did, on or about 20 Jul93, fail to go at the prescribed time to your appointed
place of duty and also fail to have your room in inspection order, for which a LOC was
accomplished.
f. You did, on or about 14 Jun 93, fail to go at the prescribed time to your appointed
place of duty and also fail to have your room in inspection order, for which a LOC was
accomplished.
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM j11r:'sbi~rion or higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or -r:ciseci in the Air Force and if
:.~,acterized If you are discharged, you
you are discharged, how your service will '-:
will be ineligible for reenlistment ' - .Re Air Force.
3. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to
assist you. You have been scheduled an appointment at the Ofice of the Area Defense
Counsel at Building 216 ony ssp pq
counsel at your own expense.
hours. You may consult civilian
at lqm
4. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statyents you want
the separation authority to consider must reach me by
you request and receive an extension for good cause
separation authority.
ory~ hours unless
send them to the
-
5. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure
will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
6. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the
3 19th Medical Group o n m q y a t ~ 7 3 0 hours for the examination.
7. Deliver to me immediately your military identification card and those of your
dependents. I have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFR 30-
20, paragraph 2-9. You will report to me by C O B 3 s - p qy , to verify that issuance of
Temporary Identification Card(s) has been accomplished.
8. Any personal information you fbrnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act
Statement as explained in AFR 39-10, Atch 2. A copy of AFR 39-10 is available for your
use in the squadron orderly room.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Commander, 321 OSS
4 Attachments
1. Supporting Documents
a. LORnm;, 3 1 Aug 94
b. Article 15, 15 Dec 93
c. LORIUIF, 4 Nov 93
d. LOR
e. LOC
f. LOC
2. Airman's Ack- - .; icdgment
3. EPP
4. RIP
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0546
His misconduct included two instances of failure to obey lawful orders, two incidents of dereliction of duty, at least two instances of failure to maintain his uniforms and personal hygiene standards, failure to go, failing to follow government vehicle operating instructions resulting in an accident, violating the base visitor sponsorship policy, providing alcoholic beverages to another airman who was under the legal drinking age, and soliciting that airman to make a false statement. ...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00068
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DQ EE WLNG, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Her infractions included missing numerous appointments with her On-The-Job Training manager, failing to complete her Career Development Course in a timely manner after indicating to her supervisor on numerous occasions that she was progressing...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00448
The Board concluded the reenlistment code and reason and authority for the discharge received by the applicant were found to be appropriate. e. Additional: AF FORM 393, 28 JUL 94 - Failed to make satisfactory LOR, 16 MAY 9 4 - Failed to make satisfactory progress in the Weight Management Program. The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-62.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00437
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201, In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The discharge board or, the discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00278
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board ( D M ) and was scheduled to participate in a video-teieconference, but did not appear at the time specified. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement acknowledging that he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. For this misconduct, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 15 May 02 (Attachment E).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00441
\\IL41 1 0 \ O k COL\ltI i MEMBER SITTING llON I VUTE OF THE 'BOAfll) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE YUMBER FD-2005-00441 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. LOR, 31 MAY 0 2 - Dereliction of duty.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00365
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 8 Jun 92 for 4 yrs. As a result, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 24 Jan 94.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0421
The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for minor disciplinary infractions after 2 years, 3 months and 16 days of service. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process, In view of the foregoing findings the...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00216
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2003-00216 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was due to financial negligance (sic), on my behalf. For this offense you received an Article 15 dated 15 Jun 94, with a UIF entry.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00217
'The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. '['he records indicated the applicant rcceived an Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana on two separate occasions. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not bc changed.