AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
, L
TYPE GEN
- -
IX
I NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
''colMSw
I
MEMBER SITTING
ISSUES A94.06
A93.02
IKDEX NIILIBER
A67.30
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
I
I RECORDREVIEW
:, .. . '
I
HON
" VOTE OF THE B?A&D&'
GEN
UOTHC
I OTHER
I DENY
I
EXHIBITS SUBRlIlTED '1'0 THE BOARD
I
I
w:rri., ?
I
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
I 1
1 2 1 APPLlCATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATlON
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
- --
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
29 Sep 2005
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISION.41 RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON T I E AlTACHU) AIR FORCE DISCHAKGE REVJEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATI0N.U-E
I
I
I
I FD-2005-00121
I
I
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
+ CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY
C - - -
I
INDORSEnlENT
...
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
--
I
DATE: 10131'2005
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
FROM:
I
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
1
1
I
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00 164
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise
this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUES:
Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and he was immature. The records
indicated the applicant received a general discharge for a pattern of misconduct and failure in the alcohol abuse
treatment. For his misconduct he received the following: an Article 15 for being disrespectful in language to a
noncommissioned officer, underage drinking, and driving while under the influence of alcohol; seven Letters of
Reprimand for failure to go and obey a lawful order, drinking and possession of alcoholic beverages underage,
disrespect to a superior commissioned officer and superior noncommissioned officer, lying, uniform not within
standards, late returning from breakfast and lunch, improper conduct in the duty area, and a civil arrest for assault; and
a Letter of Counseling for dereliction of duty. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the
applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a
significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received
by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Issue 2. Applicant states that the charges of his civil arrest were dropped and if the incident had been looked into he
would still be in the military. This issue is without merit as the applicant did not provide any documentation to
support this issue. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this
case.
Issue 3 applies to the applicant's post-service activities and desires for a government job or a job in law enforcement.
The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, no inequity or
impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the
misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.
If the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, he should consider exercising
his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If he should choose to exercise his right to a personal
appearance hearing, the applicant should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual evidence of the inequity and any
exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the community.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that
the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade
of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH AlC) (REHEARING)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a Gen Dish fr Loring AFB, ME
on 9 Feb 88 UP AFR 39-10, para 5-49d (Misconduct - Commission of
a Serious Offense) Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. OTHER FACTS:
a. See attached cy of Examiner's Brief dtd 19 Mar 03.
b. The AFDRB reviewed case on 9 Apr 03 (non-appearance w/o
counsel) & concluded applicant's discharge should not be changed.
3. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REHEARING: Appl (DD hn 293) dtd 15 Mar
05.(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
Atch
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 9 Feb 88 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-49d (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). Appeals for Honorable
Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 3 Oct 66. Enlmt Age: 19 5/12. Disch Age: 21 4/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-28, E-62, G-44, M-71. PAFSC: 42652 - Jet Engine Mechanic.
DAS: 7 Oct 86.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 4 Mar 86 - 22 May 86 (2 Months 19 Days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enld as AE? 23 May 86 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 8 Mos 18 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AE? - 30 Nov 87 (Article 15, 30 Nov 87)
A1C - 23 Sep 87
AMN - 23 NOV 86
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 30 Nov 87, Loring AFB, ME - Article 134. You, did,
between on or about 19 Aug 87 and on or about 18 Oct 87,
with intent to defraud, falsely pretent to - - - - -
that
Communications Op
telephone numbers
and
your home telephones or that you were
charge long distance telephone calls to these numbers,
then knowing that the pretenses were false, and by means
thereof did wrongfully obtain - - - - - Communications
services of a value in excess of $100.00, to wit: long
distance telephone calls. Reduction to AB, forfeiture
of $150.00 pay per month for two months, and 45 days
extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
were
e. Additional: LTR, 29 SEP 87 - Revocation of On-Base driving privileges
due to driving with a suspended license.
LOR, 27 SEP 87 - Drunk on station and disorderly conduct.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 23 May 86 - 22 May 87 Loring AFB 8 (Annual)
(Discharged from Loring AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yr (11) Mos (6) Das
TAMS: (1) Yr ( 8 ) Mos (18) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 10 Jan 03
(Change Discharge t o Honorable)
Issue 1: I am requesting that my discharge from the Air Force be upgraded
from General to Honorable. At the time of my discharge, I was a 20 year old kid
away from home for the first time. There was nothing in my background or
upbringing to prepare me for service life in the desolate conditions of Loring
A.F.B. in Maine. I was a flight line get engine mechanic working out in the
harsh elements. I made several attempts to get a transfer out of that area but
was denied. I was young and immature, and that is refected (sic) in the
decision that I made at the time to leave the Air Force.
Issue 2: I have spent the past 6 years as a civilian contract mechanic to
the Army National Guard. I regret the decision I made years ago not to satisfy
the terms of my enlistment. It is embarassing to have the mistake I made as an
immature kid follow me around to this day. My success today is direct result of
the tools that the Air Force provide (sic) me back then. It is my regret that I
was too young to appreciate it at the time. My record will show that I was an
outstanding and hard working Airman. My dissatisfaction with my location never
affected my work product or work ethic. I have learned alot (sic) since then
and would change the past if I could, but since that is not an option, I am
asking for my discharge to be upgraded.
Issue 3: I greatly appreciate the time that will be taken to review my
request .
ATCH
None.
1 7 MAR 2005
APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL
FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
{Please read instructions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.)
Form Approved
OM8 No. 0704-0004
Expires A u g 31, 2 0 0 6
. I
.
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 0 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources.
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports 10704-00041,
1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON BACK OF THlS PAGE.
AUTHORITY: 1 0 U.S.C. 1553; E.O. 9397.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
RlNClPAL PURPOSE(S): To apply for a change in the characterization or ieason for military discharge issued t o an individual.
OUTINE USEIS): None.
ISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure t o provide identifying informqion may impede processing of this application. The request for
1 42 OMS (SAC), LORING AFB, ME
I
OTHER (Explain1
I SEPARATION TO:
6. ISSUES: WHY AN UPGRADE OR CHANGE IS REQUESTED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST (Continue in ltem 14. See instructions on
Page 3.)
I request an upgrade of my G E F R A L discharge to HONORABLE on the ground of equity. The specific issues relevant to my
case are listed in Block 14.
I
I
I
I
I
8.
IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION, THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE: (Continue in ltem 17.
If military documents or medical records are relevant to your case, please ~end~copies.)
7. fX if applicable) AN APPLICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON (YYYYMMDDI
* I AND THlS FORM IS SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, OR EVIDENCE.
. I
I attach for reference my previous Form 293, dated January 10,2003, and request reconsideration of the Board's decision of April 9,
2003 (Docket No. FD-2003-00037). I now am represented by counsel and desire a hearing in Washington, DC. See DODD
11'211QC1 1 9 7 C
200301 10
.
. .
13. CERTIFICATION.
I make the foregoing statements, as part of m y claim, with full knowledge of the'
penalties involved for willfully making a false statement or claim. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Sections 2 8 7
and 1001, provide thar an individual shall b e fined under this title or imprisoned n o t more than 5 years,
I
CASE NUMBER
(Do not wrire in this space.)
14. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 6, ISSUES (If applicable)
1. I was discharged following one Article 15 (for making collect calls with a government phone) and two less serious offenses.
All of these errors of judgment arose out of difficulties I was having in my personal relationships. I took responsibility for my
errors - none of which involved the performance of my military duties - when they occurred, and I regret them to this day. I
believe that my discharge was inconsistent with the standards of discipline prevalent in the Service at the time of my discharge.
See DODD 1332.28 E4.3.2.
2. Folldwing my Article 15, I sought medical attention for my ensuing depression. I was discharged from the Service shortly
after I was diagnosed as suffering fiom an adjustment disorder that impaired my ability to function in a military environment.
Under current policies and procedures, it is doubtful that I would have received a general discharge. See DODD 1332.28 E4.3.1.
3. Even if my discharge was equitable and proper at the time of its issuance, the relief I seek is warranted based on my capability
to serve, as demonstrated by my service record and other evidence, including my recent one-year deployment to Iraq as a civilian
military contractor, were I proudly served alongside and under the sape conditions as uniformed military personnel. See DODD
1332.28 E4.3.3.
15. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 8, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (If applicable)
I thank the Board for its reconsideration of this matter.
MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.
ARMY
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis
9 7 0 0 Page Avenue
St. Louis. MO 631 32-5200
(See http:llarba.army.pentagon.mil)
AIR FORCE
Air Force Review Boards Agency
SAFIMRBR
550-C Street West, Suite 4 0
Randolph AFB, TX 781 50-4742
1.
'>
N A V Y AND MARINE CORPS
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
7 2 0 Kennon Street, S.E.
Room 3 0 9 (NDRB)
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023
COASTGUARD
U.S. Coast Guard
Commandant (G-WPM)
2 1 0 0 Second Street, S.W. Room 5500
Washington, DC 20593
I
1
I
D D FORM 293, AUG 2 0 0 3
Page 2 of 4 Pages
h
DEPARTMENT O F T H E A I R FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 4 2 D BOMBARDMENT WING (SAC)
L O R I N G AIR FORCE BASE, MAINE 0 4 7 5 1 - 5 0 0 0
REPLY TO
ATTN OF:
4 2 OMS/CC
SUBJECT:
L e t t e r o f N o t i f i c a t i o n
TO:
1 .
I am recomnending your d i s c h a r g e from t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s A i r Force
f o r t h e Commission o f a S e r i o u s O f f e n s e , Other S e r i o u s O f f e n s e s . The
a u t h o r i t y f o r t h i s a c t i o n i s AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-49d.
recomnendation
h o n o r a b l e o r g e n e r a l .
c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s g e n e r a l .
I am recomnending t h a t your s e r v i c e be
i s approved, your s e r v i c e w i l l be c h a r a c t e r i z e d as e i t h e r
I f my
2 . My reason f o r t h i s a c t i o n i s your c o m n i s s i o n o f a s e r i o u s o f f e n s e
and m i n o r d i s c i p l i n a r y i n f r a c t i o n s :
a . You d i d , a t L o r i n g A i r F o r c e Base, Maine, between on o r about 19
August 1987 and on or a b o u t 18 October 1987, w i t h i n t e n t t o d e f r a u d ,
f a l s e l y p r e t e n d t o AT&T Cornn
Government t e l e p h o n e numbers
home t e l e p h o n e s o r t h a t you were a u t h o r i z e d t o
t e l e p h o n e c a l l s t o t h e s e numbers,
f a l s e , and by means t h e r e o f d i d w r o n g f u l l y o b t a i n AT&T Comnunications
s e r v i c e s o f a v a l u e i n excess o f $100.00,
tel.ephone c a l l s . T h i s i s evidenced by t h e A r t i c l e 15 you r e c e i v e d on 30
Nov 87, and t h e a t t a c h e d S e c u r i t y P o l i c e Report o f I n v e s t i g a t i o n
#245/G-9, a t a t t a c h m e n t I .
t h e n knowing t h a t t h e p r e t e n s e s were
t h e
were your
s t a n c e
t o w i t :
l o n g d i s t a n c e
Copies o f t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y i n
s u p p o r t o f t h i s recomnendation a r e a t t a c h e d . The Commander e x e r c i s i n g
SPCM j u r i s d i c t i o n o r a h i g h e r a u t h o r i t y w i l l d e c i d e whether you w i l l be
d i s c h a r g e d o r r e t a i n e d i n t h e A i r F o r c e and,
i f you a r e d i s c h a r g e d , how
I f you a r e d i s c h a r g e d , you w i l l be
your s e r v i c e w i l l be c h a r a c t e r i z e d .
i n e l i g i b l e f o r r e e n l i s t m e n t
i n t h e A i r Force.
3. You have t h e r i g h t t o c o n s u l t c o u n s e l . M - i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel has
been o b t a i ned
consu I t ---
t you.
---------- a t Bu i 1 d i ng -_LO_Q?----- on
---Q~!?oo -. You may c o n s u l t c i v i l i a n counsel a t
I have made an appointment f o r you t o
your own expense.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
SEPTEMBER 18,1947
4 . You have t h e r i g h t t o s u b m i t s t a t e m e n t s i n y o u r own b e h a l f . Any
s t a t e m e n t s you want t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y t o c o n s i d e r must r e a c h me
b y -a-wk~-f$ u n l e s s you r e q u e s t a n d r e c e i v e a n e x t e n s i o n f o r good
cause shown.
I w i l l send t,hem t q t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y .
I f you f a i l t o c o n s u l t c o u n s e l o r t o s u b m i t s t a t e m e n t s i n y o u r own
5 .
b e h a l f , y o u r f a i l u r e w i l l c o n s t i t u t e a w a i v e r o f y o u r r i g h t t o d o s o .
6 . You have been s c h e d u l e d f o r a m e d i c a l e x a m i n a t i o n . You m u s t r e p o r t
t o t h e P h y s i c a l Exa-m U n i t , USAF H o s p i t a l , L o r i n g Q ~ Q ~ - - - on
$-~S'&U@ f o r t h e e x a m i n a t i o n .
- ----------
7 . Any p e r s o n a l
P r i v a c y A c t a s e x p l a i n e d i n AFR 39-10, A t c h 6. A copy o f AFR 39-10
a v a i l a b l e f o r y o u r u s e a t 42d OMS O r d e r l y Room.
i n f o r m a t i o n you s u b m i t i n r e b u t t a l
i s c o v e r e d b y t h e
i s
8. E x e c u t e t h e a t t a c h e d acknowledgement and r e t u r n i t t o me
i m n e d i a t e l y .
3 A t c h s
I . A r t i c l e 15, d a t e d
30 Nov 87, w / R e p o r t
o f I n v e s t i g a t i o n
8245-G9.
2a.
2b.
L e t t e r o f Repr imand,
d t d 27 Feb 87, w / l n c i d e n t
R e p o r t 802- 177-87.
.
L t r , 42 CSG/CD,
acknowledged 2 9 Sep 87,
w i t h I n c i d e n t R e p o r t
809-830-67.
3.
A i r m a n ' s R e c e i p t o f
L e t t e r o f N o t i f i c a t i o n .
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0021
c CONCLUSIONS: %- Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was con2istent with the procedural and subsmive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within theacretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. ated t h i s discharge action a general discharge without consulted w i t h counsel and waived __ - - 3. Execute-the attached acknowledgement and r e t u r n it t o me -,- - --_ -_ - - Suspended A r t...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0232
Further, t h e respondent was advised o f the r i g h t s t o a hearing before an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board, t o consult and be represen- t e d by counsel, t o submit statements i n a d d i t i o n t o o r i n 1 i e u o f board hearing, o r t o waive any o f these r j g h t s . The record o f t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board and t h e case f i l e contain no e r r o r s o r i r r e g u l a r i t i e s p r e j u d i c i a l t o t h e respondent's r i g h t...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0039
(Change Discharge to Honorable & Change the RE Code) Issue 1: I would like you to review the case of my discharge from the Air Force on November 8th 1 9 8 9 . Force for a pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, The authority for this action is AFB 39-10, paragraph 5-47b- If my recommendation is approved, your service I am recommending will be characterized as honorable or general- that your service be characterized as general. 2 - My reasons for this action...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00179
Applicant statement to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. The one thing that makes life easier to deal with is my relationship with God. I f you are discharged, you w i l 4.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00225
TO: I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00225 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00082
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ( AFSNISSAN NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) Tl.PE GEN I 1 NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I MEMBER SITTING I 1 c-..-..-..-..-....--------------a ISSUES A94.06 A02.17 A92.22 A39.00 INDEX NUMBER A65.00 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 1 GRADE 1 SRA I X I I I RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL - - - HON GEN UOTHC VOTE OF'I HE BOARD - - - I OTHER ( I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 I ORDER...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00073
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD03-0073 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. DAS: 20 Jan 87. b , Prior S v : (1) AFRes 8 Feb 86 - 14 Aug 8 6 ( 6 Months 7 Days) (Inactive).
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00080
I was told it was because of the reason for separation on my military discharge. T h i s f a c t i s e v i d e n t i n t h e Records o f Counseling g i v e n t o t h e respondent and t h e subsequent p s y c h i a t r i c e v a l u a t i o n , d a t e d 30 A p r i l 1987.The r e t e n t i o n of t h i s respondent would b e i n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e maintenance of good o r d e r and d i s c i p l i n e . The respondent should b e discharged and h i s d i s c h a r g e should be...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00030
Recommend t h a t respondent be separated with an honorable discharge, w i t h or without an o f f e r of P & R; or c. Direct t h e respondent be separated with a g e n e r a l discharge, w i t h or without an o f f e r of P & R. 6. The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, para exceeding weight standards. Copies of the documents to be forwarded t o the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0038
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD20024038 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner’s Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) FD2002-0038 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.