AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD2002-0021
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
-. _.
The attached brief con&&
-
-
available pertinent data on theapplicant and the factors leadingW3he discharge.
@@?DINGS: Upg
scharge is denied.
-
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record or that provided by applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety that would justifl a change of discharge.
Issues. Applicant was discharged for misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. He had
three Articles 15, and a vacation of suspended punishment. Elis misconduct included dereliction of duty,
false official statement, two instances of driving drunk on base, eluding police while driving at an excessive
and reckless speed which resulted in a motor vehicle accident, and vehicular assault against a security
police officer in the execution of her duties. At the time of the discharge, applicant waived his right to
submit a statement on his own behalf. Applicant now infers his discharge was too harsh because he was
discharged shortly after completing in-patient alcohol rehabilitation. The Board noted that member was
entered into the alcohol rehabilitation program after his first drunk driving incident and successhlly
completed the program. His base driving privileges were also revoked at that time. More than a year after
completing the rehabilitation program, he had his second drunk driving incident. This incident included
driving on revocation, eluding police attempting to stop and arrest him, vehicular assault against a different
officer attempting to stop him, and a motor vehicle accident. At that time, his chain of command decided to
recommend discharge, but to also send him to in-patient rehabilitation as a measure toward helping him
transition to civilian life. He was advised before he went to the in-patient program that he would be
administratively discharged from the military after completion. Although applicant completed the in-
patient program, his medical records indicate he was unwilling to take responsibility for his actions and
reksed to make a plan for his fbture life. It is Air Force policy that personnel who do not respond
favorably to rehabilitation be considered for separation. The applicant's additional misconduct was of a
very serious nature and members who commit acts of misconduct, even under the influence of alcohol, are
held accountable for their actions. No inequity or impropriety was found in this discharge in the course of
the records review.
c
CONCLUSIONS: %- Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was con2istent with the
procedural and subsmive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within theacretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board hrther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
FD2002-0021
-
(Former AMN) (HGH SRA)
-
-,.-
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec‘d a GEN Disch fr USAF 90/06/06&P
5-47b (Pattzn-f Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good OrTeGand E
R 39-10,
Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 66/12/18. Enlmt Age: 18 11/12.
AFQT: N/A. A-41, E-82, G-76, M-74. PAFSC:
Control Systems. DAS: 88/05/12.
Di’sch Age: 23 5/12.
5552B - Avionics Gu
Educ:HS DIPL.
dance &
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 85/11/20 - 86/03/03 (3 months 14 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 86/03/04 for 4 yrs. Extended 87/09/23 for 3 months.
Extended 89/07/13 for 2 months. Extended 89/08/28 for 12 months. Svd: 04 Yrs 03
Mo 03 Das, all AMs.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 90/03/13 (Article 15, 90/03/13)
SRA - 89/03/04
A1C - 87/07/04
AMN - 86/09/04
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15’s: (1) 90/03/13, Anderson AFB, Guam - Article 111. You, did,
on or about 7 Mar 90, operate a vehicle, to wit: a
passenger car, while drunk. You did, on or about 4 Mar
90, assault A1C ------ , who then was and then known by
you to be a person then having and in the execution of
Air Force security police duties, by driving at her
with a means likely to produce death or grievous bodily
forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for twSmnths, and
60 days restriction. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
- harm, to wit: an automobile. Reduction to &mn,
ic
-ii
(2) 90/03/12, Vacation, Anderson AFB, Guam - Article 111.
You, did, on or about 4 Mar 9 0 , on Perimeter Road,
operate a vehicle, to wit: a passenger car, in a
reckless manner by failing to yield to an on coming
vehicle and driving at excessive speeds while eluding a
security police vehicle. Forfeiture of $350.00 pay per
month for two months. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(3) 90/01/04, Anderson AFB, Guam - Article.92.
- . - You, having
-
._
~
FD2002-0021
knowledge of your duties, were, on or about 12 Dec 89,
derelict in the performance of those duties, in that
you negligently failed to secure to your vehicle, the
cart containing a TTU-205 tester, as it was your duty
to do. You, having knowledge of your duties, were, on
or about 12 Dec 89, derelict in the performance of
those duties, i n that willfully failed t o report that a
TTU-205 tester had fallen from your vehicle, as it was
-2 e- your duty to do. Forfeiture of $ 4 0 0 . O q y E e r month
-
for two months (in excess of $50.00 pay per-month for
two months suspended until 3 Jul 90-1 , and forty five
days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
-
1"
(4) 88/09/29, Anderson AFBr Guam - Article 111. You, did,
on or about 17 Sep 88, at the inbound lane of the main
gate, operate 'a vehicle, to wit: a passenger car, while
drunk. Reduction to Amn (suspended until 28 Mar 89),
forfeiture of $150.00 pay per month for two months, and
30 days correctional custody. (No appeal) (No
mi tigation)
e.
Additional: DD FORM 1408, 14 FEB 90 - Traffic violation.
f. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: 86/03/04 - 87/05/02 Loring AFB
87/05/03 - 88/01/16 Loring AFB
88/01/17 - 89/01/16 Anderson AFB 9 (Annual)
89/01/17 - 90/01/16 Anderson AFB 4 (Annual)
9 (Annual)
9 (CRO)
(Discharged from Travis AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFLSAR, AFGCM, AFOUA, AFOSSTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (04) Yrs (06) Mos (17) Das
TAMS: ( 0 4 ) Yrs (03) Mos (03) Das
-.
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 01/08/28.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
- Issue 1: I
release from 1990.
put in Alcholism (sic) Rehab and I was discharge upon
ATCH
none.
02/05/08/ia
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S 6 3 3 D A I R BASE WING ( P A C A F )
APO S A N F R A N C I S C O 96334-5000
REPLY TO
A I T N OF: JA
- -_-
SUBJECT
Final Review:__ AFR 39-10 Discharge (Amn
43 OMS)
-;9=Tb cc
- 2 -
-.
2 4 MAY 1990
-
be discharged from the A i r
I have
-10, paragraph 5-47b.
and f i n d i t l e g a l l y s u f t i c i e n t
10, unless otherwi se stated.
ated t h i s discharge action
a general discharge without
consulted w i t h counsel and waived
__
-
-
3. Summary o f the Evidence. To support the discharge, the i n i t i a t i n g
commander c i t e d the foldowing evidence from the case f i l e :
a. On 4 Mar
assaulted a securi
on 12 Mar 90 and was entered i n t o the Alcohol Rehabilitation Center f o r
inpatient treatment due t o the severity o f h i s condition, which he completed
on 8 May 90.
operated h i s vehicle while drunk and also
For this, he received A r t i c l e 15 punishment
b. On 4 Mar 90,
and was d r i v i n g a t ex
Suspended A r t i c l e 15 punishment on 12 Mar 90.
operated h i s vehicle i n a reckless manner
eds. For this, he,received Vacation o f
c. On 14 Feb 90,
i n a motor vehicle acc
korces T r a f f i c Ticket
i l e d t o y i e l d the r i g h t o f way resulting
is, he received a DD Form 1408, Armed
d. On 12 Dec 89,
duties. For this, he
e. On E S e p 88,
was d e r e l i c t i n the performance o f h i s
i c l e 15 punishment on 4 Jan 90.
operated h i s vehicle while drunk. -%r
this, he received A r t i c l e 15 punishment on 29 Sep 88.
4. Service Characterization. The i n i t i a t i n g commander has recommended a
general discharge. To determine the appropriateness o f t h i s recomnendation,
we must review Respondent's military record i n the current enlistment and
apply the guidelines for and r e s t r i c t i o n s on service characterization found
i n Chapter 1, Section B.
5. Review of.Respondent's M i l i t a r y . Record.
i s serving on h i s f i r s t term o f enlistment which began on 4 Mar 86.
Respondent i s a I n e r t i a l Navigation Specialist and was assigned $D tbe
43d Organizational Maintenance Squadron on 12 May 88. Wspondent nas
i s 23 years o l d and
received three APRs,
the overall r a t i n g o f a "3." The Respondent i s e n t i t l e d t o wear the A i r
Force Training Ribbon, A i r Force Good Conduct Medal and the A i r Force
Longevi ty Ribbon.
the overall ratings o f which are "9s," and 1 EPR with
For the Respondent. A f t e r consulting with counsel,
6.
r i g h t t o submit .- - matters f o r your consideration.
waived h i s
-,A.
7. Analysis o f Service Characteriation. 43 OMS/CC
discharge- Wti a characterization i s warranted when s i g n i f i c a n t z n e g i v e
aspects-of- the member's conduct o r performance o f duty
aspects o f the member's m i l i t a r y record.
I n t h i s case
incidents o f serious misconduct constitute s i g n i f i c a n t
h i s m i l i t a r y record, j u s t i f y i n g service characterization as general .
recomnds a general
ve
epeated
s of
8. Preprocessing Rehabilitation. Paragraph 5-2 states that, "Airmen should,
as a rule, be given an opportunity t 6
In t h i s cas
discharge action starts."
opportunities , including three A r t i c l e
conduct. Therefore,
t h i s regulatory requirement has been f u l f i l l e d .
r deficiencies before
has been given numerous
n an attempt t o correct h i s
,
9.
co
OP
respond t o formal administrative actions, including three A r t i c l e 15s. His
misconduct i s o f a very serious nature and has been repeated, constituting a
continual danger t o the A i r Force. Continued r e h a b i l i t a t i o n e f t o r t s would be
f u t i l e i n t h i s case.
has had ample
he has f a i l e d t o
The i n i t i a t i n g
10. Other-considerations. The case t i l e does not contain a Keport o f
Medical txamination (SF8tr ) showing Respondent i s q u a l i f i e d f o r worldwide duty
o r discharge. This report must be included i n the f i l e before discharge can
be executed (para 6-11).
11. Conclusions.
I find:
a. The reason c i t e d as the basis for discharge i n the Letter o f
N o t i f i c a t i o n i s supported by a preponderance o f the evidence;
b. The reason c i t e d i n the Letter o f Notification i s a proper basis o f
discharge;
-
-
c. TheTecMnendation for a general discharge i s appropriate pursuant
t o the c r i t e r i a of paragraph 1-18 and the r e s t r i c t i o n s i n paragraph 1-21; and
d. Although t h i s airman i s e l i g i b l e for P&R under Chapter 7, he i s not
a suitable candtdate.
c -
+ =
12. RECOMMENDATION: You should approve separation o
A i r Force w i t h a general discharse. without an o f f e r
from the
and
___." --
S t a f f -Judge-Advocate
-
~
, - - -
~
2 Atch -
1. Proposed Action
2. Discharge F i l e (Amn M i l l e r )
-,
DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 4 3 D BOMBARDMENT WING. HEAVY (SAC)
APO SAN FRANCISCO 96334-5000
REP^^^^ 43 OMS/CC
ATTN. O F
. -_ _-_
N o t i f i c a t i o n
- L e t t e r
>-
Yo.’. .
-
43 OMS
I
17 May 1990
-,;--
- =
-
1.
I am recommending your discharge from t h e United States A i r
Force f o r a p a t t e r n of misconduct, conduct p r e j u d i c i a l t o good
order and discipline, according t o AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47b.
Copies of t h e documents t o be forwardedbto t h e separation
a u t h o r i t y t o support t h i s recommendation a r e attached.
2. My reasons f o r t h i s a c t i o n are:
- -
-
.
a. On 4 Mar 90, you operated your v e h i c l e while drunk and you
a l s o assaulted a s e c u r i t y policeman. For t h i s , you received
A r t i c l e 15 Punishment on 12 M a r 90 and were entered i n t o t h e
Alcohol R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Center (CSRC)
you completed on 8 May 90.
f o r i n p a t i e n t treatment which
b.
On 4 Mar 90, you operated your v e h i c l e i n a reckless
manner and were d r i v i n g a t excessive speeds. For this, you
received Vacation of Suspended A r t i c l e 15 punishment on 12 Mar 90.
c. On 14 Feb 90, you f a i l e d to y i e l d t h e r i g h t o f away
r e s u l t i n g i n a motar v e h i c l e accident. For t h i s , you received a
DI) Form 1408, Armed Forces T r a f f i c Ticket an 14 Feb 90.
d. On 12 Dec 89, you were d e r e l i c t i n t h e performance of your
duties. For this, you received A r t i c l e 15 Punishment on 4 Jan 90.
,I
e.
O n 17 Sep 88, you operated your v e h i c l e while drunk. For
this, you received A r t i c l e 15 Punishment on 29 Sep 88.
- you t o con-t
- -----------
3. You have t h e r i g h t t o consult counsel. M i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel
has been obtained t o a s s i s t you.
. You may consult c i v i l i a n counsel
I have made an appointment f o r
B u i l d i n g 21000, Ext 3&6-2281%&
0900 hrs
a t Your own expense.
0
4. You have t h e r i g h t t o submit statements i n your behalf. Any
, unless you request and receive an
statements you want t h e separation a u t h o r i t y t o consider m u s t
reach m e by 22 May 90
extension f o r good cause shown.
separation authority.
l send them t o t h e
I w i
l
I f you f a i l t o consult counsel o r to submit statements i n your
l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver of your r i g h t to
5.
awn behalf, your f a i l u r e w i
do so.
-- -
-,
~
-
l
P e a c e .
. . . i s o u r P r o f e s s i o n
6. You have been scheduled f o r a medical examination. You must
r e p a r t to 633 Medical Graup, a t 0730 hours on 21 May
.
7. Any personal information you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l i s covered by
t h e Privacy Act Statement as explained i n AFR 39-18, attachment 6.
A Copy o f AFR 39-10 i s - a v a i l a b l e f o r your use i n t h e U n i t Orderly
Room.
mmed i ate1 y .
8. Execute-the attached acknowledgement and r e t u r n it t o me
-,-
- --_
-_
-
-
Suspended A r t 15
Punishment, 12 Mar 90
1. A r t 15, 12 Mar 90
2-' AF Form 366, Vac o f
- -
3. DD Form 1408, Armed Forces
T r a f f i c Ticket, 14 Feb 98
4. A r t 15, 4 Jan 90
5. A r t 15, 29 Sep 88
6. Airman 's Acknowledgment
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0039
(Change Discharge to Honorable & Change the RE Code) Issue 1: I would like you to review the case of my discharge from the Air Force on November 8th 1 9 8 9 . Force for a pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, The authority for this action is AFB 39-10, paragraph 5-47b- If my recommendation is approved, your service I am recommending will be characterized as honorable or general- that your service be characterized as general. 2 - My reasons for this action...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00152
- ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 07 Dec 2005 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00152 I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used i i AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00102
-- I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. He contends that his commander at the time of discharge stated he believed applicant was deserving of an Honorable Discharge but was directed to offer him a General Discharge, that at the Administrative Discharge Board, his commander testified that he should have an Honorable Discharge (applicant later changed his issue to state that his commander's testimony was that he should receive a General Discharge),...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00497
I 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ITIAL) - 1 flE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAhlE OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL YES No X ISSUES A94.05 HEARING DATE MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X IL E X I I I B I ' ~ ~ I B M I ~ T E D I I I TO THE BOARD 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVlEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE T O THE...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00137
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00137 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. LOC , LOC , LOC , LOR, 25 MAY 90 19 MAY 89 20 APR 89 01 MAR 89 - Late for duty. S u p p o r t i n g Documents a AF Form 3070, s e r v e d 6 Nov 9 0 , w / a t c h b LOR, d a t e d 1 3 J u l 90 w / a t c h c LOC, d a t e d 25 May 90 d LOC, d a t e d 19 May 89 e...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00141
ISSUES: Applicant was recommended for discharge based on both drug abuse and misconduct; the records indicated the applicant received five Letters of Counseling (LOCs) for being late to work, and a commander- directed urinalysis was returned positive for the presence of cocaine. Member exercised his right to an administrative discharge board and the board found that member was late to work five times and did wrongfully use cocaine. SrA-(APR Indicates): 14 Jun 85-21 Dec 85.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00032
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW B o r n HEARTNf2 p w r n n n TYPE GEN COWSEL YES No PERSONAL APPEARANCE X NAME O F COUNSEL AND O R ORGANIZATION RECORD REVIEW I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING WDEX NUMBER A67.90 ISSUES A92.35 A02.17 A92.21 A92.19 A94.05 A02.13 , &BIBITS v*+ 1 I ORDER APPOMTMG THE BOARD S U B M ~ ~ ~ ~ I O IQE ~gw:~ I I APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I ^ HEARING...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0487
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD02-0487 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. 4, 14 Dec 89) SGT - 2 6 Jun 8 9 (Article 1 5 , 2 6 Jun 89) c. Time Lost: 46 Days (1 O c t - 5 Oct 89 & 10 Oct-19 Nov 89) d. Art 15's: (1) 26 Jun 89, Nellis AFB, NV - Article 111. at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, on or about 9 June 1889, operate a vehicle, to w i t : a piqkup truck, while drunk, as evidenced by an Article 15 dated 26 Jpne IQ&Q,...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00385
He was administratively disciplined for failing dorm room inspections, failing to maintain proper standards of personal hygiene and cleanliness, failure to go, and operating a vehicle without insurance or current registration. DD Form 214 APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Piease read Instnrcrions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) As a r e s u l t , your v e h i c l e was impounded and you r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r o...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00527
Not k~mwing this discharge ~. (Atch 6 ) g. On 12 J u l y 1989, you went from your appointed p l a c e of duty without a u t h o r i t y , a s evidenced by a Record o f I n d i v i d u a l Counseling, dated 12 J u l y 1989. If you a r e discharged, you w i l l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r 3.