NAME OF SER\'ICE RIER.IRER (LAS'I', FIRST MIDDLE INI'I'I 11.)
GKAIIE
( AFSNISSAN
AIR FORCE I)ISCIlARGE IiEVlEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
PERSONAL-APPEAI~ANCE
-.. -,, .....
.....
AND OR 0RGANIZAI.ION
M EMBER SITTING
.
.-
.-
..............
".--
.
..............
.........-......
,
ON OF COIINSEL
-
VOTE OF THE BOARD
--
.........
-. . -
INDEX NUMBLII
A66.00
API'I.I(.~ATION FOR REVIEW O F DISC'] IARGE
OF NOI~IFICA'~ION
I HEARING DATE
1
I
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
(:OUNSEL'S RELEASE T O TIIE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SIJBM1T'I'F.D A.1- 'SIME OF
PERSONAL, APPEARANCE
I I N t KECORDIN(i OF PFRSONAI APPFAIZAN('F
- --
- . -. , . - ,-
,. . ,
I
08 D ~ c 2005
APPLICANT S ISS- AND THE BOARD'S IlEClSlONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THZ ATTACHED ZIK FORCE DISCHARGE KtVlEW BOAR11 DECISIONAI, RATIONALI
FD-2005-00217
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
subrriit an application to the AFBCMR
.... '.. ......... -.
.....
SAFIMRRR
550 C‘ STREEI WEST, SUITE 40
k4NDOI.PH AFR. 'TX 78 150-3742
SECRETARY OF I'IIE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COI'NCII,
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD
1535 COMRIAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS APE, Mi) 20761-7QQt
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will bc used
-
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE KEVlEW HOARD UECISlONAL RATIONALE
CASF NlIMHbK
FD-2(,()5-()0217
GENERAL: Thc applicant appeals for ilpgradc of discharge to honorablc.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance berorc the Discharge Review Board (1)KR) but declined to
exercise this right.
'The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
Thc Board finds that neither the evidencc of record nor that providcd by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSIJE: Applicant does not contest his discharge. lie stales that he has had a clcail record with no lilrtllcr
legal implications and that he would like to regain beileiits previously denied him due to his discharge. '['he
records indicated the applicant rcceived an Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana on two separate
occasions. In addition, he received three Lctters of Reprimand and four Records of Individual Counseling
for failure to go and for missing an appointment. The DRB opincd that through these administrative actions,
the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negativc behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct
was a significant departure Srom coilduct expccted of all military members. The characterization of' the
discharge rcceived by the applicant was found to be appropriatc.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Iicview Board concludes that thc discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requireinents of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the appIicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not bc changed.
Atlachmcnt :
Examiner's Brief
-
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DLSCKARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A l C ) (HGH SRA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Grand Forks AFB, ND on 1 3 Dec
9 6 UP AFI 3 6 - 3 2 0 8 , para 5 . 5 4 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 12 Jul 7 4 . Enlrnt Age: 1 7 9 / 1 2 . Disch Age: 22 5 / 1 2 . Educ: H S DIPL.
E - 5 7 , G-36, M-57. PAFSC: 2A531G - Logistics Plans
AFQT: N/A. A-50,
Apprentice. DAS: 23 May 9 4 .
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 28 Apr 92 - 1 3 Dec 9 2 ( 7 months 1 6 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 14 Dec 9 2 for 4 yrs. Svd: 4 Yrs 0 Mo 0 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - 19 Sep 9 6 (Article 1 5 , 1 9 Sep 96)
SrA - 14 Dec 9 5
A1C - Unknown (EPR indicates: 1 4 Dec 9 2 - 13 Oct 9 4 )
Amn - 1 4 Jun 9 3
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 1 5 ' s : (1) 1 9 Sep 9 6 , Grand Forks AFB, ND - Article 1 1 2 a . You
did, between on or about 1 Sep 9 5 and on or about 3 0 Sep
9 5 , wrongfully use marijuana. You did, at or near
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, on or about 10 Oct 9 5 ,
wrongfully use marijuana. Reduction to AB (in excess of
reduction to the grade of A1C suspended). (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 26 MAR 9 6 - Failure to go.
LOR, 28 NOV 9 5 - Failure to go.
RIC, 11 OCT 9 5 - Late for work.
LOR, 05 JUL 9 5 - Late for work.
RIC, 1 2 MAY 9 5 - Missed appointment.
RIC, 1 7 NOV 9 4 - Leaving work without authority.
RIC, 20 OCT 9 4 - Late for work.
f. CM: None.
g . Record of SV: 1 4 Dec 92 - 13 Oct 94 Grand Forks AFB 5 (Initial)
1 4 Oct 94 - 13 Oct 9 5 Grand Forks AFB 3 (Annual)
14 Oct 95 - 1 3 Oct 9 6 Grand Forks AFB 2 (AnnualIREF
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, SWASM W/1 DEV, NDSM, AFOUA W/l DEV, AFGCM,
AFLSAR .
i. S t m t of Sv: TMS:
TAMS:
( 4 ) Yrs ( 7 ) Mas (16) Das
( 4 ) Yrs ( 0 ) Mos ( 0 ) Bas
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) d t d 2 Sun 0 5
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I wish to have my discharge upgraded from General to Honorable.
I've had a clean record, no further legal implications.
Issue 2: Id like to regain benefits previously denied me due to my
discharge.
ATCH
None.
I
I
i
DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS, 3 1 QTH AIR REFUELING WING (AMC)
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE. NORTH DAKOTA
9 DEC 1996.
FROM: 3 19 AGSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Letter
I. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for drug abuse. The
authority for this action is AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54. If my recommendation is approved,
your service will be characterized as general.
2. My reason for'-this action is:
You did, at or near Grand Forks, North Dakota, between on or about 1 Sep 1995 and on
or about 30 Sep 1995, wrongfully use marijuana. You did, at or near Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada, wrongfully use marijuana. For this misconduct, you were punished under Article 15 on
17 Sep 96. Punishment consisted of reduction to the grade of Airman Basic, but that portion of
the punishment in excess of reduction to Airman First Class was suspended.
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
You have been scheduled an appointment at the Office of the Area Defense Counsel at Building
21 6 on 3 &q 6 at \ L w hours. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.
5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by 6
and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation authority.
c 96 at i53 O hours unless you request
6 . If you fail to consult counsel or to,submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You have been scheduled fox a medical examination. You must report to the 3 19th Medical
Group on6b*qG at 0730 hours for the examination.
8. Deliver to me immediately your military identification card and those of your dependents. I
have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFI 36-3001, paragraph 4.2.
You will report to me by COB d b e q to verify that issuance of Temporary Identification Card(s)
has been accomplished.
.* I ,
9. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act Statement as
explained in the attachment to this letter. A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the
squadron orderly room.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
5 Attachments:
1. Privacy Act Statement
2. Supporting Documents
k i c l e 15 dated 17 Sep 96
3. Other Derogatory Data
4. Respondent's Case
5. Personnel Data
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00437
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201, In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The discharge board or, the discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0546
His misconduct included two instances of failure to obey lawful orders, two incidents of dereliction of duty, at least two instances of failure to maintain his uniforms and personal hygiene standards, failure to go, failing to follow government vehicle operating instructions resulting in an accident, violating the base visitor sponsorship policy, providing alcoholic beverages to another airman who was under the legal drinking age, and soliciting that airman to make a false statement. ...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00061
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBEK FD-01-00061 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, college work and other information contained in the records. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana, and tested positive for marijuana a second time.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00116
The Board concluded that there was no inequity or impropriety as concerns the reason and authority for pplicant's discharge and denied the requested relief, noting that the case file contained one Article 15, two JORs, one LOA, and 4 RICs for misconduct to include failure to go, violating quarters restrictions, .ircurnventing his chain of command, careless driving, involvement in verbal and physical altercations with US ex-girlfriend, falsifying a leave document, and failure to meet training...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00120
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF ATCH 1 . I have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFR 30-20, paragraph 2-9.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00448
The Board concluded the reenlistment code and reason and authority for the discharge received by the applicant were found to be appropriate. e. Additional: AF FORM 393, 28 JUL 94 - Failed to make satisfactory LOR, 16 MAY 9 4 - Failed to make satisfactory progress in the Weight Management Program. The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-62.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00068
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DQ EE WLNG, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Her infractions included missing numerous appointments with her On-The-Job Training manager, failing to complete her Career Development Course in a timely manner after indicating to her supervisor on numerous occasions that she was progressing...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00187
Applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to appointed place of duty and making a false official statement. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached, The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction ox higher 'authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and if you are discharged, how...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0344
‘el tng AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Estimate n.d AB a TYPE sa PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING XxX [— rx xX xX | | xX ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXOIEOGEEMITIED TORMEBOARD Gc ee A01.00 A67.70 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 (| LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0073
ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Commission of a Serious Offense. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0073 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ES (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1, MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 96/01/03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.52 (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). 02/06/04/ia Pp2edz2- C075 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 319%H AIR RECUELING WING...