Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00217
Original file (FD2005-00217.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SER\'ICE  RIER.IRER (LAS'I', FIRST MIDDLE INI'I'I 11.) 

GKAIIE 

(  AFSNISSAN 

AIR FORCE I)ISCIlARGE  IiEVlEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

PERSONAL-APPEAI~ANCE 

-.. -,, ..... 

..... 

AND OR 0RGANIZAI.ION 

M EMBER SITTING 

. 

.- 

.- 

.............. 

".-- 

. 

.............. 

.........-...... 

, 

ON OF  COIINSEL 

- 
VOTE OF THE BOARD 

-- 

......... 

-.  .  - 

INDEX NUMBLII 

A66.00 

API'I.I(.~ATION  FOR REVIEW O F  DISC'] IARGE 

OF NOI~IFICA'~ION 

I  HEARING  DATE 

1 
I 

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 
(:OUNSEL'S  RELEASE T O  TIIE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SIJBM1T'I'F.D  A.1- 'SIME  OF 
PERSONAL,  APPEARANCE 
I  I N t  KECORDIN(i OF PFRSONAI  APPFAIZAN('F 

- -- 

- . -.  , . - ,- 

,.  . , 

I 

08 D ~ c  2005 
APPLICANT  S ISS-  AND THE BOARD'S IlEClSlONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THZ ATTACHED  ZIK FORCE DISCHARGE KtVlEW BOAR11 DECISIONAI,  RATIONALI 

FD-2005-00217 

Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal  appearance with/without counsel, and the right to 
subrriit an application to the AFBCMR 

....  '.. ......... -. 

..... 

SAFIMRRR 
550 C‘  STREEI WEST, SUITE 40 
k4NDOI.PH  AFR. 'TX  78 150-3742 

SECRETARY OF I'IIE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COI'NCII, 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD 
1535 COMRIAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR 
ANDREWS APE, Mi) 20761-7QQt 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will bc used 

- 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE KEVlEW HOARD UECISlONAL RATIONALE 

CASF NlIMHbK 

FD-2(,()5-()0217 

GENERAL:  Thc applicant appeals for ilpgradc of discharge to honorablc. 

The applicant was offered a personal  appearance berorc the Discharge  Review Board  (1)KR)  but declined to 
exercise this right. 

'The attached brief contains available pertinent  data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied. 

Thc  Board  finds  that  neither  the  evidencc  of  record  nor  that  providcd  by  the  applicant  substantiates an 
inequity or impropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

ISSIJE:  Applicant  does not  contest his discharge.  lie stales that  he has had  a clcail record  with no  lilrtllcr 
legal implications and that he would  like to regain  beileiits previously denied him due to his discharge.  '['he 
records  indicated  the  applicant  rcceived  an  Article  15  for  wrongfully  using  marijuana  on  two  separate 
occasions.  In  addition,  he  received  three Lctters of Reprimand  and  four  Records of Individual  Counseling 
for failure to go and  for missing an appointment.  The DRB opincd that through these administrative actions, 
the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negativc behavior.  The Board concluded the misconduct 
was  a  significant  departure  Srom  coilduct  expccted  of  all  military  members.  The  characterization  of' the 
discharge rcceived  by  the applicant was found to be appropriatc. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Iicview  Board  concludes  that  thc  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive  requireinents  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of  the 
discharge authority and that the appIicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view of the foregoing findings the Board  further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not bc changed. 

Atlachmcnt : 
Examiner's Brief 

- 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR FORCE DLSCKARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

(Former A l C )   (HGH SRA) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Grand Forks AFB, ND on 1 3  Dec 
9 6   UP  AFI 3 6 - 3 2 0 8 ,   para 5 . 5 4   (Misconduct -  Drug Abuse).  Appeals for Honorable 
Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 12 Jul 7 4 .   Enlrnt Age: 1 7   9 / 1 2 .   Disch Age: 22 5 / 1 2 .   Educ: H S   DIPL. 

E - 5 7 ,   G-36,  M-57. PAFSC: 2A531G  -  Logistics Plans 

AFQT: N/A.  A-50, 
Apprentice.  DAS: 23 May 9 4 .  

b.  Prior Sv:  (1) AFRes 28 Apr 92  -  1 3   Dec 9 2   ( 7  months 1 6   days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 14 Dec 9 2   for 4   yrs. Svd: 4   Yrs 0 Mo 0 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  A1C  -  19 Sep 9 6   (Article 1 5 ,   1 9   Sep 96) 

SrA -  14 Dec 9 5  
A1C  -  Unknown  (EPR indicates: 1 4   Dec 9 2   -  13 Oct 9 4 )  
Amn -  1 4  Jun 9 3  

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art  1 5 ' s :   (1) 1 9   Sep 9 6 ,   Grand Forks AFB, ND -  Article 1 1 2 a .   You 

did, between on or about 1 Sep 9 5   and on or about 3 0   Sep 
9 5 ,   wrongfully use marijuana.  You did, at or near 
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, on or about 10 Oct 9 5 ,  
wrongfully use marijuana.  Reduction to AB  (in excess of 
reduction to the grade of A1C suspended). (No appeal) 
(No mitigation) 

e.  Additional: LOR, 26 MAR 9 6   -  Failure to go. 
LOR, 28 NOV 9 5   -  Failure to go. 
RIC, 11  OCT 9 5   -  Late for work. 
LOR, 05 JUL 9 5   -  Late for work. 
RIC, 1 2   MAY 9 5   -  Missed appointment. 
RIC, 1 7   NOV 9 4   -  Leaving work without authority. 
RIC, 20 OCT 9 4   -  Late for work. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g .   Record of SV: 1 4   Dec 92 -  13 Oct 94  Grand Forks AFB  5  (Initial) 

1 4   Oct 94  -  13 Oct 9 5   Grand Forks AFB  3  (Annual) 
14 Oct 95 -  1 3   Oct 9 6   Grand Forks AFB  2  (AnnualIREF 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFTR, SWASM W/1 DEV, NDSM, AFOUA W/l DEV, AFGCM, 

AFLSAR . 

i.  S t m t   of Sv:  TMS: 
TAMS: 

( 4 )   Yrs  ( 7 )  Mas  (16) Das 
( 4 )   Yrs  ( 0 )   Mos  ( 0 )   Bas 

4 .   BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) d t d   2  Sun 0 5  

(Change Discharge to Honorable) 

Issue 1:  I wish to have my discharge upgraded from General to Honorable. 

I've had a clean record, no further legal implications. 

Issue 2:  Id like to regain benefits previously denied me due to my 

discharge. 

ATCH 
None. 

I 
I 

i 
DEPARTMENT O F  THE AIR FORCE 
HEADQUARTERS, 3 1 QTH AIR  REFUELING WING (AMC) 

GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE. NORTH DAKOTA 

9 DEC 1996. 

FROM:  3 19 AGSICC 

SUBJECT:  Notification Letter 

I.  I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for drug abuse.  The 
authority for this action is AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54.  If my  recommendation is approved, 
your service will be characterized as general. 

2.  My reason for'-this action is: 

You did, at or near Grand Forks, North Dakota, between on or about 1 Sep 1995 and on 

or about 30 Sep 1995, wrongfully use marijuana. You did, at or near Winnipeg, Manitoba, 
Canada, wrongfully use marijuana.  For this misconduct, you were punished under Article  15 on 
17 Sep 96.  Punishment consisted of reduction to the grade of Airman Basic, but that portion of 
the punishment in excess of reduction to Airman First Class was suspended. 

3.  Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this 
recommendation are attached.  The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and if you are 
discharged, how your service will be characterized.  If you are discharged, you will be ineligible 
for reenlistment in the Air Force. 

4.  You have the right to consult counsel.  Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. 
You have been scheduled an appointment at the Office of the Area Defense Counsel at Building 
21 6 on 3 &q  6 at \ L w  hours.  You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense. 

5.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
separation authority to consider must reach me by 6 
and receive an extension for good cause shown.  I will send them to the separation authority. 

c 96 at  i53 O  hours unless you request 

6 .  If you fail to consult counsel or to,submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

7.  You have been scheduled fox a medical examination.  You must report to the 3 19th Medical 
Group on6b*qG  at 0730 hours for the examination. 

8.  Deliver to me immediately your military identification card and those of your dependents.  I 
have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFI 36-3001, paragraph 4.2. 
You will report to me by  COB d b e q  to verify that issuance of Temporary Identification Card(s) 
has been accomplished. 

.*  I ,  

9.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act Statement as 
explained in the attachment to this letter.  A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the 
squadron orderly room. 

10.  Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately. 

5  Attachments: 
1.  Privacy Act Statement 
2.  Supporting Documents 

k i c l e  15 dated 17 Sep 96 

3.  Other Derogatory Data 
4.  Respondent's  Case 
5.  Personnel Data 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00437

    Original file (FD2006-00437.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201, In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The discharge board or, the discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0546

    Original file (FD2002-0546.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His misconduct included two instances of failure to obey lawful orders, two incidents of dereliction of duty, at least two instances of failure to maintain his uniforms and personal hygiene standards, failure to go, failing to follow government vehicle operating instructions resulting in an accident, violating the base visitor sponsorship policy, providing alcoholic beverages to another airman who was under the legal drinking age, and soliciting that airman to make a false statement. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00061

    Original file (FD01-00061.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBEK FD-01-00061 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, college work and other information contained in the records. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana, and tested positive for marijuana a second time.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00116

    Original file (FD2005-00116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board concluded that there was no inequity or impropriety as concerns the reason and authority for pplicant's discharge and denied the requested relief, noting that the case file contained one Article 15, two JORs, one LOA, and 4 RICs for misconduct to include failure to go, violating quarters restrictions, .ircurnventing his chain of command, careless driving, involvement in verbal and physical altercations with US ex-girlfriend, falsifying a leave document, and failure to meet training...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00120

    Original file (FD2004-00120.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF ATCH 1 . I have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFR 30-20, paragraph 2-9.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00448

    Original file (FD2005-00448.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board concluded the reenlistment code and reason and authority for the discharge received by the applicant were found to be appropriate. e. Additional: AF FORM 393, 28 JUL 94 - Failed to make satisfactory LOR, 16 MAY 9 4 - Failed to make satisfactory progress in the Weight Management Program. The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-62.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00068

    Original file (FD2004-00068.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DQ EE WLNG, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Her infractions included missing numerous appointments with her On-The-Job Training manager, failing to complete her Career Development Course in a timely manner after indicating to her supervisor on numerous occasions that she was progressing...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00187

    Original file (FD2006-00187.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to appointed place of duty and making a false official statement. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached, The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction ox higher 'authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and if you are discharged, how...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0344

    Original file (FD2002-0344.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘el tng AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Estimate n.d AB a TYPE sa PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING XxX [— rx xX xX | | xX ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXOIEOGEEMITIED TORMEBOARD Gc ee A01.00 A67.70 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 (| LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0073

    Original file (FD2002-0073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Commission of a Serious Offense. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0073 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ES (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1, MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 96/01/03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.52 (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). 02/06/04/ia Pp2edz2- C075 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 319%H AIR RECUELING WING...