Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0495
Original file (FD2002-0495.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING REC:OHU 

.- . ., 

Sk:R\'l(.'k: XIKXIBEH  (l..AS'r. FIKSI' hlll)l)l.E IhI'1'I:iI.) 

.- 

. . 

rrrrrWrr 

I \ l'b. 

C'OI NSEI. 

] X  PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

1 \%IF OF(~01'SSEI. +hD OH OHChhlll.,\l 

I O h  

GRADE 

.AFSI\'/SS,tN 

SRA 

- 

RECORD REV1 EW 

,\UDRESS  \ S D  OR OKGA>IZiTION  OF (:OliNSt.l. 

.. 

- -  - -  

I 
I 

-- 

- .  , . 

.- 

I 

I 

.- 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

.." 

MEMBERS SITTING 

VOTE OF'THF RO.*RD 

110% 

,- 

Lk.T 

". 

1 0 1  HC 

O l  lit-K 

I>& 

\ \  

1.451 LS 
A93.01,  A94.05 

IYUE\  NI'4IBEH 
A67. 10 

1 
2 

I 

 
ORDIIK AI'POINIIN(i  I I II: 130iIKl.) 

EXHIBITS SIIRhllTTED TO THE BOAKU 

-

-

I 

API'LIC'A'I'ION  FOR RI-VIF:W 0 1 '   I)l\(.'i l.AR(iI: 

. 

I 
.. . . . . . 

-1 

I 

4 1 

I 
! 

1 
I 

ZPI'I.ICAN  I S  ISSlit A h I l I I I I :   I3OAKD 5 I)ETISION,IL  RATIONAL ARE 1)ISCLISSEDON THE AT14CHED .AIR FORCE DISCHARGk RI'V1t.W UOJ\I

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00153

    Original file (FD2005-00153.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD r c 1 ) (HGH SRA) .i 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: ;>. DC 20693 DD FORM 293.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00073

    Original file (FD2003-00073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD03-0073 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. DAS: 20 Jan 87. b , Prior S v : (1) AFRes 8 Feb 86 - 14 Aug 8 6 ( 6 Months 7 Days) (Inactive).

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00216

    Original file (FD2006-00216.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFllQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE L A 3 L NLIMDLK FD-2006-00216 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. A copy of AFI 363208, is available for your use in the 365 TRS Commander's Support Staff. For this misconduct, he received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, on 14 Feb 06. a.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00017

    Original file (FD2006-00017.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Information was extracted from the Legal Review) LOR, LOR, LOC, 21 JAN 04 - 08 SEP 03 - 22 FEB 02 - LOR, LOR, LOR, LOC, LOC, 05 NOV 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 18 JUN 01 - 14 FEB 01 - Financial irresponsibility. On 5 Jan 04, an investigation revealed L11dAnn i ~&shunurabiy fdcd iv pay iis Military Star Card debt, for which he wj3 given a Lettor 6Fiiphand (LOR), dated 2 1 Jan 04, which was filed in his Personnel Information File (PIF). Direct that the respondent bo discharged from the Air...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00057

    Original file (FD2005-00057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO: I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00057 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00179

    Original file (FD2003-00179.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant statement to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. The one thing that makes life easier to deal with is my relationship with God. I f you are discharged, you w i l 4.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00347

    Original file (FD2006-00347.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (I.ASr, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ......................... '..-..-..-..-..-..-------I TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE SSGT I X RECORD REVIEW AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNISSAN , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCAN17ATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL I I MEMBER SITTING ,." (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. I f t h e r...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00307

    Original file (FD2006-00307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIKS'I' MIDDLE INI'I'IAL) CKADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a I TYPE GEN 1 Y E S C o L ~ S E ~ n 1 NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE AB I X RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANI%A'l'ION O F C'CIIINSEI I 1 I MEMBER S I T T I N G I I HON I GEN VOTE OF THE BOARD I UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1NL)ES NUMBER A66.00 1 CASENUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 I ORDER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00388

    Original file (FD2005-00388.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MY DISCHARGE WAS UNJUST BECAUSE MY CASE WAS NOT lHOROUC3HL.Y REVIEWED BY MY COMMANDER 7. Prior to the initiation of my discharge, I was told I would remain in the United States Air Force after my Commander passed judgment My Commander did not take any stripes away h m me, but she did suspend a stripe until 7 December 2005, and gave me fifteen days of extra duty. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for drug abuse, specifically, Vicodin.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00213

    Original file (FD2005-00213.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. The applicant contends that the discharge action was improper because he should have been discharged by Sheppard AFB rather than Keesler AFB. Applicant's Issues.