Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00307
Original file (FD2006-00307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIKS'I' MIDDLE INI'I'IAL) 

CKADE 

AFSNISSAN 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a  

I 

TYPE  GEN 

1  Y E S C o L ~ S E ~ n  1  NAME O F  COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

AB 
I 

X 

RECORDREVIEW 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANI%A'l'ION  O F  C'CIIINSEI 

I 
1 

I 

MEMBER S I T T I N G  

I 
I 

HON 

I 

GEN 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

I  UOTHC 

I  OTHER 

I 

DENY 

1NL)ES NUMBER 

A66.00 

1  CASENUMBER 

EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 

1  I  ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 

2 

1  A P P l   I('A 

I  I O N  b O l <  R k V l h W  OF DISCHARGE 

LETTER OF NOT1FIC:ATION 

PERSONAL, A P P R A R A N C E  

'I'APK  lC H4KGk  K t \  1k\b  BUAKI) 
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3KD FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFII, MD 20762-7002 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, J A N  00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

('ASK  NLJMRER 

FD-2006-00307 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. 

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied. 

The  Board  finds  that  neither  the  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  the  applicant  substantiates  an 
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. 

ISSUE: 

Issue  1.  Applicant contends that he made a severe error in judgment  and kept company with the wrong 
crowd; prior to incidents he did not have any derogatory information on him.  The record indicates the 
applicant was convicted by a Special Court Martial for the wrongful use of marijuana and lysergic acid 
diethylamide (LSD).  The Board took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his 
performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.  They found the seriousness of 
the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of'the applicant's duty performance and concluded the 
misconduct was a significant departure froin conduct expected oSall military members.  The characterization 
of the discharge received by the applicant was So~lnd to be appropriate. 

Issue 2.  Applicant states he has applied with the City of Chattanooga as a firefighter but can not be 
considered with his current discharge.  The Board was sympathetic to the impact the discharge is having on 
the applicant's ability to obtain suitable employment, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety 
which would warrant an upgrade. 

CONCLUSIONS: 
'I'he  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

111  view or the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

(Former AB)  (HGH Sm) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl  recrd a GEN Disch fr USAF McChord AFB, WA on 12 
Sep 00 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.54  (Misconduct -  Drug Abuse).  Appeals for 
Honorable Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 30 May 76. Enlmt Age: 19 11/12.  Disch Age: 2 4  3/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-63,  E-63,  (3-64, M-73. PAFSC: 2A551J - Aerospace Maintenance 
Journeyman. DAS: 24 Jan 97. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 10 May 96 -  11 Jun 96 (1 month 2 days)(Tnactive). 

3 .   SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 12 Jun 96 for 4 yrs. Svd: 04 Yrs 03 Mo 02 Das, all AMS 

b.  Grade Status:  AB  -  3 J u l   00  (GCMO#45, 7 Aug 00) 

SrA -  12 Jun 99 
A1C -  12 Oct 97 
Amn -  Unknown 

c.  Time Lost:  None 

d.  Art 15's:  None. 

e.  Additional: None. 

f.  CM:  General Court Martial Order No.45  -  7 Aug 00 

CHARGE:  Article 112a.  Plea: Guilty.  Finding: Guilty. 

Specification 1:  Did, between on or about 1 Sep 98 and on or 
about 30 Sep 98, wrongfully use marijuana.  Plea: G. Finding: G. 

specification 2:  Did, between on or about 1 Sep 99 and on or 
about 31 Oct 99, wrongfully use lysergic acid diethylamide. IQb 
Plea: G.   ind ding:  G.  Sentence adjudged by military judge on 19 
Jun 00:  Confinement for three months, forfeiture of $500.00 pay 
per month for 3 months, and reduction to-AL-.-------,-.~-~ 

/"- 

g.  Record of SV: 12 Jun 96 -  11 ~ e b  98  ~Chord AFB  5  (Initial) 

12 Feb 98 -  11 Feb 99  McChord AFB  5  (Annual) 

h.  Awards &  Decs :  AFAM, AFLSAR, AFTR 

i.  Stmt of  Sv:  TMS:  ( 0 4 )   Yrs  ( 0 4 )   Mos  ( 0 3 )   Das 
TAMS:  ( 0 4 )   Yrs  ( 0 3 )   Mos  ( 0 2 )   D a s  

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 2 9 3 )   dtd 7 Aug  0 6 .  

( C h a n g e   Discharge  t o  Honorable) 

ISSUES ATTACHED  TO BRIEF. 

ATCH 
1. Applicant's Issues. 
2 .   Three Character References. 

APPLICATION FOR THX REVIEW OF D X S C ~ G E  OR DISMISSAL 

FROM THE ARMED  FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES 
mpletirg Wa  farm.) 
( P l u  zmd attackl1Lnstruetjcna 

-- Eso.  0704-0004 

Aq  33,  2006 

m

t

10 U.S.C.  1 5 5 3 1   E.O.  9 3 9 7 .  

 

-4 

W ( 8 )  r  N o n e .  

To  apply  f o r   a  change  i n  tho  characterizakion  or  reason  f o r  m i l i t a r y   dimcharge  issued  t o  an  individual. 

Voluntary.  however  f a i l u r e  t o  provide  identifying  information  may  imr4e  recessing of  thim  a 

D-t 
requeat  f o r   Social  ~ e c u k i t y  ~umbhr i s  s t r i c t l y  t o  assure proper  i d e n t i f i c a t i o n  of t e  In i v i d u a l   and a p p r o p r g t e   records. 
1.  APPLICAWT  DATA  (The  perlron  whose  discharge  i e  t o  be reviewed).  PlrXABI  Pltl)rr  on  ~ t P 2  LmOIWATION. 
a.  BRANCH  o r   8nVxCR  (X  one) 
.................................. 
b.  Nhl4.E  ( L a a t ,   F i r s t ,   Middle  I n i t i a l )  

I  MuXm coao~ 

I x I  A I ~  toncr 

I  COAST  Ow- 

AIwT 

NAVY 

I 

I 

l i c a t i o n .   The 

.---------------------- 

d.  SOCIAL  BLCVEITX  YVldBIP 

0 .   GkADB/RANK AT  DIBCUkRQE 
w - 1  
I  u-L 

----- 
( X   one)  5.  BOARD  ACTION  ILLQUESTED 

I; 

( X   one) 

CBANQE  TO  HONOMBLE 

. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I  

2 .   DATE  09  DIOCtIAROL  OIL  BLPARATIOB 

~YIIYMO) 
ase. m

(It date  is rmre than 15 7 
 a LO Fban  149) 

t

4.  X)IICRX#OP  CEAUCTERSZATION  ILECLIYm 

~ O N O M B L I I  

X  5 E N B ~ L / ~ ~ R  

UONORABIs  CONDITIONS 

20000912 

OR  BLP1U'XXO# 

3 .   UNIT  AND  L O C A T X O ~ ~  AT  DIBCEARQE 
62d Aircraft Generation 
Sadn 
6. 
I was discharged with a General  (Under Honorable Conditions) due to 
misconduct.  I began to keep company with the nwronq crowdBf, as an adult I 

f S S U E B s   WaT *N  VPOIUDL  OR  CHNJGZ  I 6  REQtlRBTm  UII JUBTIPZCATION  FOR  TEE  ILEQUBST 

( O n t h i n  ftm14.  &instlU&icne  cnRsge 3 . )  

VUDIF. OTHER  THAN IIOWOP*OLI  CONDITSOlfB 
BAD  ColpDUCX  (Special  court-martial  only) 
VNCBAUCTERIZXD 
OTHER  (Explain) 

CHAWQL  TO  OENEIUL/VNDER 
HOPOEABLX  CONDITIONB 
eaMtOX  TO  t l W C ~ C T l m I Z r 0  
(Not  applicable  f o r  A i r  Force) 
CBhM5E  N A X m T t W   P P l B O N   FOIL 
SEPARATION  TO: 

-- 

7 .  

(X  i f  applicable)  AN  APPLICATION  WAS  PPPVIOUBLY  SW#XTTED  0U  (YWYMmDD) 
AND  THIU  POW  xa  SUBMITTED  TO  ADD  NJDXTIONAL 

JUSTXYXC~TIOW,  OIL  m x D u c E .  

IBBUEB. 

8 .   -OR$ 
B
See  Attachments 

o & "

I

~ O ~ W I

A $ ~ I m ~ O & ~ ~  

ARS  B ~ ~ T T Q  

I

,

 

AS  'ZVIDElICEt  (Untfnue An  Itm 17. If military 

~

~

I

~

~

~

t

(X  one) 

9.  TYPE  OF REVIEW PXQVPBTm 
X 

COMUCT  A  P~COED REVIEW  or n DXSCIIAPOE  BABW  ON  I(* M I L X T A ~ Y   P ~ P ~ O ~ L  
S W L l I T T P D   Bf M.  I  -/OR 
r  m / o a  ~-l/ 
IIABRINOTON,  D .

WZtL  NOT  A P P W  BEFORZ  T E P   BO-. 

(aunsel/-tdtiw) 

TPOPOLXTAM 

C

7

.

t i = )   WIBU  TO  APPEAR  AT  A  EEARINO  AT  NO XXPIWBS  TO  TEE  OOVIE~UUT  BEFORE  THE  BOARD  IN  THE 

U X A .  

 
' 
dm) WXBH  TO  APPPAR  AT  A  I I U ~ ~ I N Q  AT  NO  rrnurnn  TO  THE  (MVTUXENT  BRIORE  A  TIUWLINQ 

~mt ~ 1 9 n y ~ s c b r g e R e v i ~ v B D a r d & w m t  h a v e a t r a ~ ~ . )  

PAUXL  CLOBEBT  TO 

FILE  AND  MY  ADDITIOUAL  D O ~ N T ~ T I O N  

10.a.  COtl#lEt  RLPILEEIPIOTATIVL  (if any) NABU (Laat,  ~ i r s t ,  Middle  ~ n i t i a l )  

ADDRBSS 

b.  TELLPBONP  IJmQIKu  (Include Area  Code) 

(See  Item 1 0  of  the  i n s t r u c t i o n s  about  counael/reprenentatfve.) 

- 

-- 

- 

-  -. 

.  - 

11.  A P P L I C M  MVBT  B I O I   I N  ITEM  13.a.  BELOW.  If t h e   record  i n  qub#tioa i a  t h a t   of  s dsceanad  o r   incompetent 

D1AT8  Ofl  IICOWETXNCY  M B T   XCCObWWY  ilt1  XPDLXCATIOU.  XT  tha  r p p l i c s t i o n   i e   aignod  by  other  than  t h e   r p p f f z i :   i n d i c r t a  
thr  a r a e   ( p r i n t )  
WIDOW 
EPOUSL 

and  r o l a t i w a h i p   by  marking  a  box below. 

LEGAL  I L P P R O B m r T X T m  

NZXT  OF  K I N  

WDOWXR 

LLQXL  PROOF  OP 

12.a.  CURXMT  K I X L I X O   ADOILLS6  O?  A P P L X C M T   O P   PERSON  ABOVE 

(Forward  n o t i f i c a t i o n   of  any  change  i n  address.) 

, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

..-..+ 

-. 

19.  C ~ R T ~ ? I C A T I O N .   I  make t h l   foregoing  #tatrmmtr,  am  p h i t   o t  my  claim,  w i t h   f u l l  knowledge  of 

tho  penaltian  involvb6  f o r  w i l   f u l   y  making  a  Tale.  statement  or  claim.  (V.S. Code,  T i t l e   1 8 ,  
Sectiona  287  and  1001  provide  that an  indlvldual  #hall  be  fined  under  t h i s   t l t l e   o r  
lmprieoned  not  more  than  5  years, or  b o t h , )  

r .,.arawb~SaR A ~ ~ ~ u I P X D .  

~ d i c r ~ t

or peruon  i n   Item 11 above) 

 

DAT8  BIOWPD  -  R L Q V I R m  

(YYYYMDD) 

nn ~ m 3 ~ ' z Z i d 1 4  
L1_.-. 

I 
PREVIGUS  EDITTCNS  ARE 

c .   r - H L I L  

-- - 

- 

T l L W H O m R   Irm(BIP  i p c l u d e  Area  Code) 

0TH.IL  (Specify) 
b. ..................... 
- - - - - - - - - - - 

a.  E - # A I L  

- - - 

d.  FAX #m(BER 
I 

(Xncludo Area  Code) 

(Do not  write  i n   t h l r   space.) 

CABE  NVYBPP 

,00303 

mmma %zL9.  m. - eO  uU 

1 of 4  P a p  

I 

4  14.  ~ O ~ I T I N P I Y I O W  01  ITXU  6,  188ml (If applicable) 
made a severe error in judgement. Prior to that time I had no derogatory 
information in my personnel  file.  I have applied for a position with the City 
of Chattanooga as a firefighter; I cannot be considered for employment without 
a "Honorable Dischargew. 

1 

15.  CONTInVAIIOI OF ITKH 8,  BIIPPOPTII?~ DOC!~I~XHTS (If applicable) 

- 

Army Review Boards  Agency 
Su  ort Divieion, St. Louis 
979g  Pacre  Avenue 
s t ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ i . ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ i 3 1 3 2 - 5 2 0 0  
(see  http;//arba.army.pentaqon.mil) 

Naval Council of Pexsonnel Boarda 
720 Kennon Street S.E. 
. . - . . . . . , . - . - . 
Room 309  INDRB) 
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023 

Air Force RevIev Board8 Agency 
SAV/MBBR 
550-C Street West. Suite 40 
Randolph WB, TX 70150-4742 

I 

DD FORM 293,  MAR  2004 

I 

I 

U .   S. Coaet Guard 
Commandant  (G-WPM) 
210b Second Street, 6 . W .   Room 5600 
Washington, DC 20593 

Page  2  of 4  Pages 

DEPAR'I'Ml3NT  OF TWE AIR FORCE 
62D AIRCRAW GENERATION SQUADRON (AMC) 

MEMORANDUM FOR AB i 

L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,  

.-----------------------------------------. 

i,  62 AGS 

FROM:  62 AGSICC 

SUBJECT:  ~otifikation Memorandum 

1. I am recammending your discharge from the United States Air Force based on drug abuse. 
The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and  Separations, and AFI 36- 
3208, Administrative Separation of  Airmen, paragraph 5.54,  If my  recommendation is approved, 
then your service will be characterized as Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions). 
I am recommending that your service be characterized as General. 

2.  My  reason for this action is: between on or about  1 Sep 98 through on or about 30 Sep 98, 
you wrongfully used marijuana and between on or about 1 Sep 99 through on or about 31 Oct 99, 
you wrongfully used LSD (Lysergic Acid Diethylamide).  For this misconduct, you received a 
General Court Martial,  with punishment consisting of confinement for three months, a reduction 
in grade to Al3, and forfeiture of  $500 per month for three months.  In addition, I initiated your 
UIF for this conduct.  (See Atchs l a  and  lb.) 

3.  I have attached copies of the documents to be forwarded to  the separation authority in 
support of this recommendation.  The commander exercising Special Court-Martial (SPCM) 
jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you are discharged or retained in the Air 
Force, and if you are discharged, how your service will be characterized.  If you are discharged, 
then you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied 
enlistment in any component of the armed forces.  Any  special pay, bonus, or education 
assistance funds may be subject to recoupment. 

4.  You have the right to consult legal counsel.  Military legal counsel is available for you.  You 
may consult the Area Defense Counsel, by calling DSN 984-2240 or COM 253-974-2240.  You 
may consult civilian counsel at your own expense. 

5.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements that you want 
the separation authority to consider must reach me by  2 j  ;T;// RO 
(six workdays) 
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause.  I will forward any such statements 
to the separation authority. 

6.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, then your failure 
will constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

7.  Upon your release from confinement, you must report to either your section commander or 
first sergeant who will then schedule you for a medical examination and a mandatory Transition 
Pre-separation Counseling appointment.  You must then report to Physical Exams, building 173, 
for your scheduled medical appointment with your medical records and to the Family Support 
Center, building 55 1, for your scheduled transition counseling. 

8.  The Privacy Act of 1974 protects any persona~bformation you furnish in rebuttal.  A copy of 
AFT  35-3208 is available for your use in the orderly room. 

9.  Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately. 

' . . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I  

Commander 

Attachments: 
1.  a. AF Form 1359, Report of Result of Trial 

b. AF Form 1 137, Unfavorable Information File Summary 

2.  Airman's  Receipt of Notification Memorandum 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00137

    Original file (FD2004-00137.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00137 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. LOC , LOC , LOC , LOR, 25 MAY 90 19 MAY 89 20 APR 89 01 MAR 89 - Late for duty. S u p p o r t i n g Documents a AF Form 3070, s e r v e d 6 Nov 9 0 , w / a t c h b LOR, d a t e d 1 3 J u l 90 w / a t c h c LOC, d a t e d 25 May 90 d LOC, d a t e d 19 May 89 e...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00426

    Original file (FD2003-00426.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) G W E AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD Texas Veterans Commission 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 ( 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ( ( TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I 1 1 -. On or about 29 November 1988, he failed his room inspection, for which he received...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00222

    Original file (FD2005-00222.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR I Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: Because my General Discharge was due to minor disciplinary infractions and I was told that it could be requested to be honorable discharge ATCH None. Your d a t e of rak as Aiman h e c a m 23 Sep 32. d. On 19...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00307

    Original file (FD2005-00307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - - - I- / Y ~ ~ M E OF SERVICE MF:RIHYH -- AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD .- - -. 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-70U2 1 -.A AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE HEVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE I FD-2005-00307 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorablc, to change thc reason and authority for the discharge, and to changc the reenlist~nent code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00034

    Original file (FD01-00034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    4 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00034 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Records review revealed that the applicant received an Article 15 for wronghlly using marijuana on or about April 30, 1985 and a second Article 15 for failure to obey a lawhl order while in correctional custody. Today I have prescribe medication Also, there is a letter from my therapist Dr. ------ Please - ATCH 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00055

    Original file (FD01-00055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE I CASE NUMBER FD-01-00055 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. - The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any. As a result, YOU received a letter of counseling, dated 21 Mar 89. e. On or about 21 Mar 8 9 , at Yokota AB, Japan, you failed to go to your scheduled...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00042

    Original file (FD2005-00042.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Commission of a Serious Offense Issue 1 : Applicant contends that he was young and immature. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. I have been out of the United States Air Force for roughly thirteen years, but not a day goes by that I do not think about the good memories, and childish mistakes that I made.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00170

    Original file (FD2004-00170.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    .. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00170 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. Svd: 1 Yrs 6 Mo 22 Das, all AMS b. Grade Status: AB - 19 Sep 90 (Vacation of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00497

    Original file (FD2004-00497.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ITIAL) - 1 flE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAhlE OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL YES No X ISSUES A94.05 HEARING DATE MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X IL E X I I I B I ' ~ ~ I B M I ~ T E D I I I TO THE BOARD 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVlEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE T O THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00471

    Original file (FD2006-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Vacation, and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Sleeping on Post During the time I was under investigation for the fire alarm incident, I was pulling guard duty.