AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02679
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Dayton, Ohio to
Fremont, California.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was homeless at the time of her enlistment into the Air
Force and was informed that she had to use some type of address.
She now has an actual residence in a different state now.
The applicant provides no documents in support of her request.
Her complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant contracted her initial enlistment in the Regular
Air Force on 2 Sep 2009. Her DD Form 4/1, Enlistment -
Reenlistment Document, reflects Dayton, Ohio as her HOR.
Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume I, Appendix A,
states in part that a HOR is the place recorded as the
individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted,
inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Any correction
must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the
member’s actual home upon entering the Service, and not a
different place selected for the member's convenience.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states the applicant’s
records reflect Dayton, Ohio as the city/state in which she
lived prior to entering the Air Force. In addition, Dayton,
Ohio has been consistently listed throughout her military
records.
2
The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 7 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
2
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 11 Dec 2012, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02679:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jun 2012.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 2 Jul 2012,w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Aug 2012.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01600
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Virginia to XXXXXXX, Texas. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04350
Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from New Jersey to Texas. DPSIPE states the member's initial DD Form 4 reflects Wrightstown, New Jersey as the city/state in which she lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout her military records as her HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Florida (FL). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03907
Her DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects East Tawas, MI as her home of record at the time of her enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03276
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Her DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Roswell, New Mexico as her home of record at the time of her enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04298
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04298 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Tucson, Arizona to Navarre, Florida. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01266
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01266 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Columbus Ohio. In support of her request, she submits a letter of selection for the United States Air Force, dated 27 Jun 72 and an AF Form 941, Statement of Understanding (Delayed Enlistment Program) signed 18 Sep 72; which identifies Columbus Ohio as the place...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01382
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01382 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Florida to Minnesota. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01786
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01786 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Virginia Beach, VA. After a thorough review of the applicant's military personnel record and other supporting documentation, there appears to be no error or injustice regarding her HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE...