RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01656
INDEX CODE: 131.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 27 NOVEMBER 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Retention Recommendation Form (RRF), AF IMT 3538, be corrected and he
be granted supplemental retention consideration.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Applicant provides a summary of items he feels were not included and/or
incorrect on his RRF. In addition, he provides supporting statements from
individuals (not within his rating chain).
In support of the application, the applicant submits a copy of his RRF, two
affidavits, copies of award certificates, a copy of a citation, and copies
of two letters of appreciation.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
indicates that the applicant is a second lieutenant with a date of rank of
8 Jul 06. He is assigned duties as a Simulation Engineer. His total
active federal military service date (TAFSMD) is 1 Sep 04. His date of
separation is 5 Sep 07.
The applicant’s record was considered and he was not selected for retention
by the CY 07 Force Shaping Board (FSB) which convened on 12 Mar 07.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRF recommends denial. DPPRF states records for officers
considered by the Force Shaping Board include an RRF written by the first
Colonel or GS-15 in the member’s chain of command and endorsed by the
Senior Rater. The RRF contains nine lines of narrative comments. The
space on the form is limited and it is not usually possible to describe
every achievement in an officer’s career. The first evaluator bears the
responsibility of selecting what accomplishments to include in the RRF.
DPPRF notes the applicant was provided a copy of his RRF approximately 56
days prior to the Force Shaping Board convening date. Eligible officers
were advised per MPFM 06-82, 2007 Officer Force Shaping Board, 6 Nov 06,
Atch 6, to carefully review the RRF and address any concerns or
discrepancies through their Military Personnel Flight, chain of command,
and Senior Rater. Senior raters were provided the opportunity to revise
the RRF through the “stop file” process prior to the board convening date.
DPPRF explains in order to appeal an RRF, applicants must offer clear
evidence that the original evaluation was “an unjust or inaccurate
assessment of [the member’s] potential for continued service.” To change
narrative comments on the RRF, an applicant must have the support of the
evaluators who signed the form. Although the applicant has provided
affidavits and letters of recognition detailing his accomplishments, he has
provided no evidence to show that his RRF is an unjust or inaccurate
assessment and does not have concurrence by his first evaluator and/or
Senior Rater.
DPPRF concludes officers are provided the opportunity to write a letter to
the board regarding information they believe warrants consideration. The
applicant submitted such a letter with attachments to the board.
The complete DPPRF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Jun
07 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are
duly noted; however, other than his own assertions, we have seen no
evidence by the applicant that would lead us to believe that he was not
properly considered for retention during the time in question or that his
RRF reviewed by the Force Shaping Board was in error. In addition, the
supporting documentation provided by the applicant was from individuals not
in his rating chain. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of HQ AFPC/DPPRF and adopt their rationale as the basis for
our decision to deny the applicant's request.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 9 Aug 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-01656:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 07 w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRF, dated 1 Jun 06 [sic].
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jun 07.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01772
In support, the applicant provides a reaccomplished RRF and a statement from her senior rater, the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff (HQ USAF/CVA), who requests the contested RRF be replaced with the reaccomplished form including the WHSA duty information. The AF/CVA Protocol Office indicated the applicant “no longer worked there,” was on terminal leave, and had been selected for the WHSA position after the CY06A FSB convened. HQ AFPC/DPPRF noted the applicant’s submission did not indicate...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | Bc-2006-01578
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01578 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 Nov 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The results of the CY06 Line of the Air Force Force Shaping Board results be corrected to show that he was selected for retention. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01578
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01578 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 Nov 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The results of the CY06 Line of the Air Force Force Shaping Board results be corrected to show that he was selected for retention. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03006
The HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/JA recommends the applicant’s nonselection for retention by the 6 June 2006 FSB be set aside and that she be considered by a special FSB selection board utilizing a corrected RRF. However, the majority of the Board believes that thorough and fitting relief in this case would be to correct her records to show that she was selected for retention by the 10 Apr 06 FSB, and to reinstate her to active duty. Accordingly, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03956
________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial of the applicants request to reaccomplish his 10 Jun 06 OPR, his 15 Dec 06 OPR, and his RRF for the L9907B/1C881 Force Shaping Board. However, giving the applicant the benefit of the doubt, and if directed by the AFBCMR, they would agree to changing the word shows to showed, on the Dec 06 OPR; however, whether the change is made or not, it does not make the report...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03048
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03048 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for retention by the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Reduction in Force (RIF) Board. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01579
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01579 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 27 NOVEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to reflect her Acquisition Professional Development Program (APDP) Level I Certification (10 December 2003), and ADPD Level II...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01308
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) was due the same month as the promotion board was to convene so he requested a commander-directed OPR so information would be available for consideration by the promotion board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPE recommends denying the applicant’s request. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03525 INDEX CODE: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for retention by the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Reduction In Force (RIF) Board. He was considered and not selected for retention by the FY07 RIF board. After a thorough...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02962 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 March 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR), for the period 2 June 2005 through 13 December 2005 be replaced with the submitted OPR, which reflects his award of the 2005...