RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02168
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His expiration term of service (ETS) should be 7 Mar 15 rather
than 7 Mar 17.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He enlisted in the Air National Guard under the PALACE CHASE
program for a four-year period; however, his recruiter made a
mistake and enlisted him for a six-year period.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his
enlistment order and other documents associated with his
enlistment.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 Jan 08 for
a period of four years.
On 7 Mar 11, the applicant was released from active duty by
reason of intradepartmental transfer, with service characterized
as honorable. He was credited with 3 years, 1 month, and
16 days of active duty service.
The applicant enlisted in the California Air National Guard, on
8 Mar 11, for a period of 6 years.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial. They note the subject matter expert
has conducted a thorough examination of the available evidence
and found that the applicant signed his enlistment contract and
during the completion of the contract, had three opportunities
to point-out the fact there were errors with the document and
instead of highlighting the errors, he signed the documents
anyway.
The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation, with attachment, is at
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 18 Nov 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02168 in Executive Session on 28 February 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jun 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 8 Nov 11, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Nov 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02191
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 1 Oct 10, he became eligible for ACP when he received his initial AGR tour orders. The applicant was initially ordered to extended active duty from 1 Oct 10 to 30 Sep 13. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01006
In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, Table 1.5, Rule 2 "prior service members will enlist for 3 or 6 years." As noted on the DD Form 4/2 when enlisting in the COANG, the applicant signed a 4 year, 6 months, 10 days military service contract. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00655
By letter dated 28 Jan 13, the applicants commander states that due to an administrative oversight the applicant signed a three year reenlistment contract; however, he should have been given the opportunity extend his enlistment for six years. Until such time as he has exhausted all available administrative remedies, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief requested. Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Mar 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02746
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with one (1) additional point for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 May 03. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial stating, in part, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03852
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03852 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to Post Deployment/Mobilization Respite Absence (PDMRA). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS concurs with A1PR and recommends denial of the applicants stated request for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02538
When enlisted promotions in the Air National Guard are approved a promotion order is written using the promotion board date as the DOR. As such, there is no way the promotion order would have been published directly after the board convened. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00795
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00795 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay) for the period of 26 Sep 11 to January 2012. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00796
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 13 Sep 07, the applicant enlisted in the CT ANG for a period of 6 years. Without any actual reasoning the SME cannot determine that he had not in fact requested the 6 year enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00088
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00088 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1POE does not provide a recommendation. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04612
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04612 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to medical continuation on extended active duty (EAD) from 1 October 2009 through 19 November 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends approval, stating,...