RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01006
COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Expiration Term of Service (ETS) be changed from 10 May
2016 to 10 May 2013.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When she transferred units, her DD Form 4,
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United
States, was incorrectly annotated by her losing unit. Her
original enlistment was for 3 years; however it appears the
6 year enlistment option was defaulted. Therefore, when she
enlisted with the gaining unit they assumed she had four years
remaining on her contract.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her
DD Forms 4 and Personal Data Report.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states that the applicants
ETS is properly reflected as 10 May 2016. Her NGB Form 22,
National Guard Report of Separation and Record of Service,
reflects she was separated from the New Mexico Air National
Guard (NMANG) on 30 Oct 2011, and transferred to the Colorado
Air National Guard (COANG) the next day. At the time of her
transfer to the COANG she had not completed her Military Service
Obligation (MSO) to the NMANG. Therefore, when she enlisted in
the COANG her enlistment included the remainder of her MSO in
addition to a 3-year enlistment with the COANG. In accordance
with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air
National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, Table 1.5,
Rule 2 "prior service members will enlist for 3 or 6 years." As
noted on the DD Form 4/2 when enlisting in the COANG, the
applicant signed a 4 year, 6 months, 10 days military service
contract.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
NGB/A1P finds no error or injustice and concurs with the A1PP
advisory opinion.
The complete A1P evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 31 Mar 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
?
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 5 Dec 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2013-01006:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Feb 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 18 Mar 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1P, dated 18 Mar 2013.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 2013.
Panel Chair
2
2
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00021
In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard as a Reserve of the Air Force, the term of enlistment for all non- prior service (NPS) applicants will be for a period of six years. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00021
In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard as a Reserve of the Air Force, the term of enlistment for all non- prior service (NPS) applicants will be for a period of six years. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01312
In support of her request, the applicant provides a counsels brief, copies of the paralegal interview, a request for reconsideration into the paralegal career field, paralegal accession disapproval, and letters of recommendation. Her legal counsel stated that four years is sufficient time to recoup its training investment in the Air Force; however, non-prior service ANG members are required to enlist for six years, not four, in accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02149
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record should be changed because it was created through an administrative error by the finance office and through no fault of her own. The Air Force Financial Services Center Debts and Remissions Branch directed the collection rate of $350.00 per month for seven months until the member's current expired term of service (ETS) date of 20 Nov 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00655
By letter dated 28 Jan 13, the applicants commander states that due to an administrative oversight the applicant signed a three year reenlistment contract; however, he should have been given the opportunity extend his enlistment for six years. Until such time as he has exhausted all available administrative remedies, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief requested. Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Mar 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00677
ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, states in cases of contractual errors, the Force Support Squadron (FSS) will process a case file to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) outlining the facts of the situation, along with the individual airmans desire, the commanders recommendation and the FSS comments and recommendation; and that the airman may petition the Board if they do not agree with the final decision. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05006
According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 20 Jun 13, the applicant requested removal of the contested OPR to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); however, her request was denied. Based on our review of the applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the contested report is not a true and accurate assessment of her performance and demonstrated potential during the specified time period or that the comments contained in the report...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01911
At the time she was discharged she had no idea that she was permanently disqualified from reentering a military service. The medical discharge is a false representation of her service in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 20 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00888
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00888 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be corrected in Item 23, Authority and Reason, to remove AFI 36- 3209, Paragraph 3.22: discharge in the interest of national security, SPD:...