RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02191
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that his Aviator Continuation
Pay (ACP) contract started on 1 Oct 10, the date his Active
Guard/Reserve (AGR) orders became effective.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 1 Oct 10, he became eligible for ACP when he received his
initial AGR tour orders. No contract could be signed until the
Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) release of the ACP policy. On 23 Feb
11, he signed the ACP contract.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
initial AGR order, aeronautical orders, DD Form 214, Certificate
of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, FY11 ACP Agreement
Statement of Understanding (SOU), and Aviator Continuation
Roster.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System
(MilPDS) indicates the applicant is currently serving in the New
Jersey Air National Guard (ANG) in the grade of captain (0-3),
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of
2 Nov 04.
The applicant was initially ordered to extended active duty from
1 Oct 10 to 30 Sep 13. His orders were later amended to extend
his tour by changing the end date of his tour from 30 Sep 13 to
30 Sep 14.
In accordance with the FY11 ANG ACP Implementation Policy,
members must have completed at least 10 years of service as a
pilot following the completion of Undergraduate Pilot Training
(UPT), Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT), Joint
Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT), Undergraduate
Pilot Training-Helicopter (UPT-H), Euro-North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) or Fixed Wing
Qualification (FWQ) for sister service accessions.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PF recommends denial. A1PF states according to the
applicants Individual Data Summary, he graduated from UPT on
7 Jun 01. This would make his initial date of eligibility for
ACP 7 Jun 11.
The complete A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit C.
NGB/A1PS concurs with the NGB Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
advisory and therefore recommends denial.
The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 26 Aug 11 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis for us to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02191 in Executive Session on 3 Nov 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jun 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. NGB/A1PF, Letter, dated 11 Aug 11.
Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS, Letter, dated 17 Aug 11.
Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 26 Aug 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03725
However, no eligible RPA pilot will be able to take advantage of this due to the way one year orders are allocated and the delay in the release of the FY11 guidance. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his Air National Guard (ANG) FY11 ACP Program Announcement and Implementation Policy, aeronautical order, FY11 ACP Agreement Statement of Understanding (SOU), and other documents in support of his application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02234
The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicants military service records are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B. This would make his initial date of eligibility start on 13 December 2011. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01838
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01838 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP) for fiscal year 2011. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03700 ADDENDUM
Excluding him, when the written ACP program never excluded officers occupying API 0 positions and when the AFBCMR and the Director of the ANG approved it retroactively for other API 0 billeted pilots' pre-FYll service, would be a discriminatory application causing error and injustice. Further, NGB does not dispute that the ACP policy as written never excluded API 0 pilots as the Director ANG concluded by approving ACP for some of them in 2010. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03532
The complete NGB/A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by providing the missing documents requested by NGB/A1PF. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05545
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05545 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His ten-year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) be declared void. The applicant contends he never signed a service commitment agreement upon entry to initial pilot training. The FY13 ACP program implementation instructions included a criterion that in order to be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03832 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His initial eligibility and start date for Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) be 11 Feb 13. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The delayed release of the Air National Guard (ANG) Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 ARP policy guidance resulted in his not being allowed to renew his two-year ARP agreement. A complete copy of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04089
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The delayed release of the Air National Guard (ANG) FY12 ACP policy guidance resulted in him not being allowed to renew his ACP agreement in time to qualify for a two-year agreement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor and are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01738
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01738 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he is eligible to participate in the Air National Guard (ANG) Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) program for fiscal year 2012 (FY12) with a three-year tour service commitment. An error and delay in processing his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03031
JA states that based on the facts presented in the NGB opinions, JA finds their responses to be legally sufficient and concurs with the recommendations to deny the applicant's requests for corrective action related to ACP payments, Board# V0611A, AGR separation from ANG Selective Retention Review Board (SRRB) consideration, and TERA. Counsels complete response is at Exhibit N. _______________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF...