RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER:BC-2010-00638
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________
_____
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed
to a 1J to allow her to reenlist in the Air Force.
___________________________________________________________
_____
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was not mentally prepared for basic training due to
high anxiety and depression after losing everything in
Hurricane Katrina. She was told she should go home and
deal with the issues of Katrina and try again in a few
years. She is older, more mature, and 100 percent positive
that this is something she wants to do. She is more
prepared for what to expect mentally, physically, and
emotionally.
In support of her request, the applicant provides an
expanded statement and copies of two letters of support.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is
at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________
_____
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records indicate she
enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 Feb 08 as an airman
basic (E-1) for a period of four years.
On 25 Feb 08, the applicant was notified by her commander
of his intent to recommend her entry level separation for a
condition that interferes with military service,
specifically a mental disorder. The applicant subsequently
acknowledged receipt of the action and waived her right to
consult with legal counsel.
On 26 Feb 08, the case was found to be legally sufficient
and the discharge authority approved the commanders
recommendation on 28 Feb 08.
On 29 Feb 08, the applicant was furnished an Entry Level
Separation with uncharacterized service and was credited
with 19 days of total active service.
___________________________________________________________
_____
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating the applicant did
not provide any documentation that would serve as the basis
for the correction requested. The applicants RE code of
2C is accurate and, by design, does in fact preclude her
from reentering the Air Force or Air Force Reserve.
A complete copy of the AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________
_____
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
applicant on 14 May 10 for review and comment within 30
days. As of this date, no response has been received by
this office (Exhibit D).
___________________________________________________________
_____
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We
took notice of the applicants complete submission in
judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis for us to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________
_____
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did
not demonstrate the existence of material error or
injustice; that the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered
relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________
_____
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00638 in Executive Session on 14 Sep 10,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Dec 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 31 Mar 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 May 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01953
The complete HQ AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit B. HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states that since the applicant has not provided documentation that warrants HQ AFRC/SGs support of her assertion, there is no basis for the requested change. The complete HQ AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant questions the legality of her discharge and the whereabouts of her...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00925
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00925 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. When she inquired about her pay date, she was told it would be the date (19 Apr 00) she joined the Air Force. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2008-04519
SGP notes to be eligible for medical retirement, the applicant must have incurred or aggravated a disqualifying condition in the line of duty. A Line of Duty (LOD) determination was provided for the diagnosis of right acoustic neuroma; however, it was not processed beyond the medical reviewer and no final determination is provided. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04795
Her record be corrected to reflect that she was selected for the position of Director, Reserve Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Management Office (REAMO) effective Jan 09. As to a violation of Title 10 USC 1034b, the applicant appears to have the opinion that she was the only qualified applicant and would have been selected but for reprisal by the Deputy AF/RE substantiated in the SAF/IGS ROI. AF/JAA states that the applicant was not the only AGR who was the top candidate for the Director, REAMO...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02003
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02003 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As for her request for a copy of her DD Form 214, AFRC/A1K forwarded a copy of the requested document to the applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive pay and points for the period Dec 10 through Nov 12. Her medical facility failed to provide the proper documentation to the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) medical board, causing her referral to a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB)....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00472
On 3 Nov 11, a letter requesting additional information (spousal concurrence) from the applicant was forwarded (Exhibit E). As such, we believe reasonable doubt has been established that although the applicant was sent the form to make an SBP election, she was not properly advised or informed of the requirement to return the form with her stated election. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01061
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01061 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank to staff sergeant (SSgt) (E-5) be restored. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02423
Furthermore, if the applicant had been granted career status while being assigned to the CMSgt position it would have meant that she could have remained at Scott AFB until 2019 when she becomes eligible for an active duty retirement. We note the applicants assertion that she was selected for the superintendent position and subsequently promoted to the grade of CMSgt and due to her selection for the superintendent position her date of separation should be changed to 28 Feb 14. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03273
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A legal review was conducted in which the AFRC Director of Military Law recommended the applicant be discharged with an entry level separation. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-03273 in Executive Session on 23 September 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: