RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01061
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her rank to staff sergeant (SSgt) (E-5) be restored.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She never altered or produced fraudulent orders.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of orders
and an electronic communication.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants records are unavailable for review. Therefore,
the only information available is that which is provided by the
applicant and that which is contained in the evaluation by the
Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states the applicant has not
provided any evidence to support her allegation that she was
demoted to the grade of senior airman (SrA) (E-4) on the basis of
her presenting and or executing fraudulent orders. However, her
record does support that she changed grades from SSgt to SrA.
Nevertheless, she provides no documented derogatory or a specific
reason for her change in grade. As such, the commands position
is that the basis for the applicants change in grade should have
been a legally sufficient action initiated by and completed by
her commander.
The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 29 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
C). As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01061 in Executive Session on 1 November 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01061:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 28 Feb 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 16 Jul 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01630
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01630 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Senior Airman (SrA) be changed from 5 Mar 14 to 13 Jan 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00436
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank of master sergeant (E-7) be reinstated with her original date of rank of 1 January 2008. The discharge board that convened on 27 January 2011 found the applicant did not wrongfully use marijuana and recommended she be retained in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00660
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00660 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her promotion to Staff Sergeant (E-5) be effective 1 Sept 13, instead of 1 Jan 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02765
She was briefed on the IPEB findings and on 28 Oct 13, she declined her right to a formal board hearing. The Medical Consultant found no basis in medical evidence that warrants granting the applicants request, other than her counsels plea that she accepted the unfit finding of the IPEB based upon misunderstandings and assumptions during the process. A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05059
She had a break in service from 4 Nov 10 until 14 Jan 11, at which time she reenlisted in the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicants correct...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04582
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her involuntary demotion order, a copy of NRPCC 1070/124, Naval Reserve Personnel Center Annual Retirement Point Record, a copy of a letter from the Naval Reserve Force Commander, an excerpt from AFI 36-2503-, Administrative Demotion of Airmen, and copies of her LES. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03165
On 5 February 2010, that order was amended to change the reporting time from 1200 to 0800. On 10 February 2010, the order was amended to change the release date to 5 February 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive pay and points for the period Dec 10 through Nov 12. Her medical facility failed to provide the proper documentation to the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) medical board, causing her referral to a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB)....
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04084
In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her AF IMT 348, Line of Duty Determination, report of medical evaluation letter dated 29 November 2005, statements of earned civilian income, and email correspondence pertaining to her INCAP pay application. The Air Force office of primary responsibility reviewed her request and determined that she had not exhausted her administrative remedies for requesting incapacitation pay in accordance with AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03173
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03173 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so she may reenlist. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be...