RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01953
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her narrative reason for separation of Released due to
Demobilization be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was not released due to demobilization and her unit was
still mobilized when she was discharged. She had two years left
on her Reserve duty.
She had a mental break down and was locked up in a psychiatric
unit and was not able to return to her job.
Her unit sent her home without out-processing her.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Available records reflect the applicant entered a period of
active duty service on 14 Feb 03 and was honorably discharged on
27 Jul 03 due to demobilization.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRC/SG states that after a review of all medical databases,
they were unable to locate documentation or information
regarding any hospitalization or psychiatric diagnosis.
Further, based on the complete lack of supporting medical
documentation, they cannot provide further comment at this time.
The complete HQ AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit B.
HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states that since the
applicant has not provided documentation that warrants
HQ AFRC/SGs support of her assertion, there is no basis for the
requested change.
The complete HQ AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant questions the legality of her discharge and the
whereabouts of her medical records. She provides a timeline of
actions.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2010-01953 in Executive Session on 16 November 2010, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXX, Panel Chair
XXXX, Member
XXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 May 10, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRC/SGP, dated 9 Aug 10.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/A1K, dated 13 Sep 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 26 Oct 10.
XXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01466
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant's case file reflects that she was denied a participation waiver by the AFRC/SG staff for the period of time in question. While the form is not signed, the Air Force Reserve Surgeon General (AFRC/SG) notes that the applicant was submitted for a participation waiver; however, her request was denied. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive pay and points for the period Dec 10 through Nov 12. Her medical facility failed to provide the proper documentation to the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) medical board, causing her referral to a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB)....
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04564
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Air Force Reserve enlisted members are recommended for promotion by the assigned supervisor and approved by the promotion authority. As for her request related to retirement, Air Force Reserve members must have 20 years of satisfactory service or have 15 but less than 20 years...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04582
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her involuntary demotion order, a copy of NRPCC 1070/124, Naval Reserve Personnel Center Annual Retirement Point Record, a copy of a letter from the Naval Reserve Force Commander, an excerpt from AFI 36-2503-, Administrative Demotion of Airmen, and copies of her LES. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05366
Air Force members must meet the medical standards and applicable Reserve medical guidance to be considered medically qualified to participate in any pay or point gaining activity In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2254, Volume 1, Reserve Personnel Participation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03938
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a member of the Air Force Reserve and was on active duty orders from 13 Oct 09 to 9 Jun 10. The supporting Reserve Medical Unit (RMU) was not notified of this until Apr 10; therefore, no LOD determination or profile action was taken prior her being placed on long term orders. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01051
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01051 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be paid Incapacitation Pay, in behalf of her late husband, for the period 1 October 2009 through 13 January 2010. We note the Air Force offices of primary responsibility recommend granting the decedents widow incapacitation pay for the requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00472
On 3 Nov 11, a letter requesting additional information (spousal concurrence) from the applicant was forwarded (Exhibit E). As such, we believe reasonable doubt has been established that although the applicant was sent the form to make an SBP election, she was not properly advised or informed of the requirement to return the form with her stated election. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01227
It is unclear why no medical documentation was provided or why the case was not completed. In this case, he is not eligible for active duty orders. We note that the Air Force offices of primary responsibility state the applicants medical condition was not found to be in the line of duty; therefore no eligibility for active duty orders or pay exists.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03317
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; medical records, letters of support, and other various documents associated with his request. Thus none of these conditions are In the Line of Duty (ILOD) as applied to Air Force disability retirement. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...