Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00431
Original file (BC-2010-00431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00431 

INDEX CODE: 108.00 

 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

She be awarded thirty-five (35) non-pay Inactive Duty Training 
(IDT) points to satisfy a year of satisfactory Federal service 
for Retention/Retirement (R/R) year ending 16 August 2009. In 
addition, her records be considered by a special board for 
promotion to major by the Calendar Year 2010 (CY10) Line and 
Health Professions Major Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion 
Selection Board. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Upon entry into the Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) 
program on 10 June 2009, her Reserve order listed her 
Retention/Retirement (R/R) date as 17 November. She completed 
the required Annual Tour (AT) and Inactive Duty Training (IDT) 
days by 22 September 2009 to ensure a satisfactory R/R year. 
Without her knowledge or notification, her R/R date was changed 
to 17 August. When her Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) came 
up for review for the CY10 Line and Health Professions Major 
Position Vacancy Promotion Selection Board, the Air Reserve 
Personnel Center (ARPC) declared she was ineligible indicating 
she did not have a good R/R year as the required points were not 
completed prior to 17 August 2009. She believes this is unjust 
because she acted in good faith to complete the requirements 
based on the original order. 

 

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her 
assignment order, PRF, ineligibility for promotion consideration 
letter, commander’s letter of support, and her Air National 
Guard/United States Air Force Reserve (ANG/USAFR) Point Credit 
Summary. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to the military personnel data system, the applicant 
is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of 
captain (O-3) with a date of rank of 17 November 2004. She has 
a Total Active Federal Military Service Date and Total Active 
Federal Commissioned Service Date of 17 November 2000. The 
applicant’s Point Credit Summary, closing 28 August 2009, 
indicates she has seven (7) years of satisfactory Federal 
service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the member’s 
military service records, are contained in the Air Force 
advisory opinion at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPP recommends denial. DPP states the applicant was 
released from active duty on 23 February 2007 and assigned to 
the ARPC, Non-Obligated, Non-Participating Ready Reserve 
Section. Effective 10 June 2009, she was assigned as an IMA to 
the Satellite Control and Network System Group, Los Angeles, 
California. Her assignment order showed her R/R date as 
17 November. The order also indicates in the remarks section 
that “Your point history record has not been audited and your 
R&R date may change.” 

 

The applicant’s point history record was audited 15 July 2009, 
in accordance with Air Force Manual (AFMAN) 36-8001, Reserve 
Personnel Participation and Training Procedures, Table 2.4. The 
audit establishes the R/R date and captures the prior service 
history, which is entered in the Point Credit Accounting and 
Reporting System (PCARS). This audit also generates a letter to 
the member informing them the audit resulted in changing their 
R/R date. Her R/R date was established as 17 August, the 
initial date entered military service. Her point history and 
correct R/R date were available online to the applicant a month 
before she started participating and a letter was generated 
informing her of this change. The timeliness of the audit was 
incredibly prompt. 

 

One month after her prior service and point history and R/R date 
was updated in PCARS, the applicant began participating on 
17 August 2009, the first day of her current R/R year. The 
member completed the IMA program requirements of 12 paid IDTs 
and 12 paid AT days, before the end of the 2009 fiscal year 

 

DPP states the applicant is not eligible for special board 
consideration for the CY10 Line and Health Professions Major 
Position Vacancy Promotion Selection Board, which convened on 
1 February 2010. In order to be considered by a PV board, the 


officer must have a satisfactory year of service in the R/R year 
most recently completed. The applicant’s most recently 
completed year was 16 August 2009. This was an unsatisfactory 
year for retirement, so the applicant was not eligible for 
consideration by the February 2010 board. She remains 
ineligible for special board consideration as the R/R year is 
still unsatisfactory. Awarding the applicant a satisfactory 
federal service year for what may or may not result in a 
promotion, will definitely result in a year towards retirement. 
The circumstances have not proved any injustice or error, only 
unfortunate timing. 

 

The complete DPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Per AFMAN 36-8001, Table 2.4, Note 2, ARPC/DPPRK is required to 
notify both her and her servicing Military Personnel Flight 
(MPF) that the R/R date had changed. Neither she nor her 
servicing MPF received such notification. Had she been notified 
of the R/R date change, she could have adjusted her schedule 
appropriately to get the requirements completed by 17 August 
2009. Instead, she completed the requirements in good faith 
based on the information she had at the time. Subsequent to 
their 4 March 2010 memorandum, ARPC/DPP informed her that they 
stopped mailing letters of notification two to three years ago. 
Additionally, their office was unable to provide a copy of any 
R/R change notification allegedly mailed to her. 

 

The applicant’s complete rebuttal is at Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we found no evidence the individual’s records 
are in error. We note the applicant’s contention that she was 
not notified of the change of her R/R date; however, her 
original assignment order noted in the remarks section that 
“Your point history record has not been audited and your R&R 
date may change.” Following the audit of her record, the 
updated R/R date was available in the Virtual Military Personnel 
Flight (VMPF) approximately one month prior to her performing 


any Reserve duty. Had she checked the VMPF she could have 
adjusted her training requirements. In addition, any changes 
made to a member’s R/R date generates a computerized 
notification from the PCARS which is mailed to the individual’s 
home address listed in the system. Based on the foregoing, we 
conclude the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Accordingly, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00431 in Executive Session on 30 September 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair 

 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member 

 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00431 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 4 Mar 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Mar 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Mar 10. 

 

 

 

 

 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03045

    Original file (BC-2005-03045.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPP contends even if she had known of the R/R date change earlier and had the opportunity to schedule her AT dates prior to the new retirement year ending (RYE) date of 21 February 2005 the additional AD points would have resulted in her RYE 21 February 2005 to show only a total of 45 points and a year of unsatisfactory service. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202016

    Original file (0202016.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the audit, the applicant's R/R was changed from 2 October to 14 June. The applicant was notified on 17 April 1999 about the change in his R/R date and that his points were being realigned to coincide with the 14 June R/R date. DPP further states the applicant was notified of the change in his R/R year date in April 1999 and he received an AF Form 526 for RYE 13 June 1999, and furthermore, the applicant had adequate time to earn points for the RYE 13 June 2000.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01372

    Original file (BC-2003-01372.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was told when he became an individual mobilization augmentee (IMA) that his retention/retirement (R/R) date was 5 Dec and that he needed to earn 50 points between 5 Dec and 4 Dec to have a “good year.” At some point his records were audited and his R/R date was changed to 30 Jan, but he was never notified of the change. This recommendation will provide the applicant a satisfactory year of service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00398

    Original file (BC-2010-00398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00398 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect an additional two non-paid inactive duty points and six paid inactive duty training points and satisfactory service for retirement year ending (RYE) 5 September 1990. Documentation does not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00117

    Original file (BC-2007-00117.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the IDT periods he is claiming are from many years ago, the evidence he is submitting clearly substantiates the performance of the duty being claimed. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice since the non-pay...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00869

    Original file (BC-2007-00869.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She and another unit member contacted HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) in July 2006 and inquired as to whether or not her duty status needed to be altered on orders. DPP notes her statement that she was unable to perform IDT training on 13 August 2005 because the entire building was closed on that Saturday and training was not available. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03439

    Original file (BC-2006-03439.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A member’s Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) is established from their Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) in accordance with Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 14507, which requires that a Line-of- the Air Force colonel, not selected for promotion to the grade of brigadier general, be separated not later than the first day of the month following completion of 30-years commissioned service. Although applicant contends he had a break in service from November 1982 to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132

    Original file (BC-2007-03132.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00713

    Original file (BC-2004-00713.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was credited with 14 AD points, 15 membership points, and 24 inactive duty training (IDT) points for R/R year 1 Sep 89 through 31 Aug 90, and a satisfactory year of federal service. He applied to the AFBCMR on 27 Feb 01, requesting to be awarded 15 points credited to R/R year 1 Sep 98 to 31 Aug 99 based on the injustice that he was overseas and made an error not completing his annual tour before the end of his R/R year. We agree with the Air Force that the applicant was provided...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0202881

    Original file (0202881.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She did not perform any IDT points during the R/R year 24 January 2001 through 23 January 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...