Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01667
Original file (BC-2009-01667.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01667

COUNSEL: NONE

HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Under Conditions Other Than Honorable (Undesirable) discharge be upgraded to general or honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served many good years, but accepts that there were bad ones as well. His first discharge was honorable and he received a good conduct medal. He had a drinking problem which is now resolved.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214, Report of Separation From the Armed Forces of the United States, and a statement of support from the XXXXX County, XXXXXXXXX Veterans Service Officer.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant’s military records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 Dec 51 for a period of four years and was progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) effective and with a date of rank of 11 Feb 55. Applicant re-enlisted on 5 Dec 55 for a period of four years.

On 10 May 59, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend him for involuntary discharge from the Air Force for unfitness due to his established pattern showing dishonorable failure to pay just debts and his established pattern of being Absent Without Leave (AWOL).

The reasons for the action were:

a. He did, on or about 17 Apr 58, without proper authority, absent himself from his unit and did remain so absent until on or about 1205 hours, on 19 Apr 58 in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for which he was tried by summary court-martial and demoted to airman first class, effective 28 Apr 58.

b. On 13 Jan 59, he was convicted, and subsequently confined, on a worthless check charge by civil authorities.

c. He did, at or about 0800 hours, on 26 Feb 59, fail to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: Base Installations Office Tool Crib in Violation of Article 86, UCMJ (failure to repair) for which he received an Article 15 and demotion to airman second class, effective 5 Mar 59.

d. He did, on or about 9 Apr 59, absent himself from his unit without proper authority, and did remain so absent until on or about 27 Apr 59 in violation of Article 86, UCMJ (AWOL), for which he was tried via special court-martial and sentenced to three months of hard labor and reduced to the grade of airman basic, effective 1 May 59.

On 21 Sep 59, the discharge authority approved the commander’s request, directing the involuntary discharge of the applicant. On 6 Oct 59, the applicant was involuntarily discharged from the Air Force with his service characterized as Under Conditions Other Than Honorable. He was credited with 7 years, 4 months, and 21 days of active service.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C.

By undated letter, the applicant responded to the Board’s request for post-service information with an additional statement describing his efforts to beat alcoholism in the years since his discharge. He started going to Alcoholics Anonymous in 1960. During the following years, he apparently sought inpatient treatment at least twice for his drinking problem. He indicates he has been sober for approximately 30 years now and has worked in a variety of capacities (including self-employment) until retiring in 1994. Since then, he has worked part-time until 2007 (Exhibit E).

By letter, dated 27 Jul 09, Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX County Veterans Service Officer, attests to the applicant’s good character, eluding to his struggle with alcohol and citing the lack of help for alcoholics in “the old days” (Exhibit F).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s general discharge for unfitness based on his established failure to pay just debts and established pattern of being AWOL was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. He has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of his service was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing directive. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s general discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01667 in Executive Session on 1 Sep 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

Mr. Robert H. Altman, Panel Chair

Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member

Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member

The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01667 was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Apr 09, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

Exhibit C. FBI Report.

Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 Jul 09.

Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated.

Exhibit F. Letter, XXXXXXX County Veterans Service Officer,

dated 27 Jul 09.

ROBERT H. ALTMAN

Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00365

    Original file (BC-2004-00365.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His punishment consisted of reduction in grade to the rank of airman basic with an effective date and date of rank of 8 Sep 58. The discharge authority approved an undesirable discharge and directed that the applicant be issued a DD Form 258AF, “Undesirable Discharge Certificate.” On 27 Mar 59, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-17, with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. At that time, the applicant was also invited to provide additional...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900714

    Original file (9900714.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Under our broader mandate and after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances of applicant's case, the Board is persuaded that applicant has been a productive member of society since leaving the service. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 21 Jan 60, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00539

    Original file (BC-2006-00539.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Separation from the service was recommended. He provides no evidence supporting his claim that there were insufficient problems in his record to justify the general discharge he received. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03596

    Original file (BC-2002-03596.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 23 June 1957, he was honorably discharged and on 24 June 1957, reenlisted in the RegAF for a period of four years. In an application, dated 13 August 1972, he requested his discharge be upgraded to one under honorable conditions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 13 August 1959, he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00723

    Original file (BC-2005-00723.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00723 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. They found the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02114

    Original file (BC-2005-02114.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Aug 05 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Jul 05. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00225

    Original file (BC-2009-00225.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had no idea about the effects of drug addiction, neither did the Air Force at that time. On 6 Mar 86, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, by reason of misconduct – drug abuse, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00626A

    Original file (BC-2006-00626A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, according to a National Archives & Records Administration Form 13038, dated 27 Oct 05, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 13 Jun 55, was discharged in the grade of airman third class on 18 Sep 58, but with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization. In their conclusions, the Board strongly suggested the applicant submit additional official documents, as his records were destroyed and the details of his military service and discharge could not be clearly or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01015

    Original file (BC-2006-01015.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Jul 77, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his UOTHC discharge. The applicant has provided no persuasive evidence showing the actions taken against him were based on factors other than his own misconduct or that his discharge was unjust, improper, or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 19 Apr 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01844

    Original file (BC-2009-01844.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, 23 Jul 09, w/atch. GREGORY A. PARKER Panel Chair AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS CASE TRANSMITTAL / COORDINATION RECORD IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: XXXXXXX BC-2009-01844 ROUTE IN TURN INITIALS DATE 1. B. TAYLOR, JR. Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records Attachment: Record of Board Proceedings