ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00626
INDEX CODE: 106.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 1958 discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s military personnel records apparently were destroyed
by fire in 1973 at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC).
Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation cannot be verified.
Special Order No. S-1323, dated 18 Sep 58, reflects the applicant was
assigned to the 5th Transportation Squadron at Travis AFB CA in the
grade of airman third class and, on 18 Sep 58, discharged under-other-
than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC). However, according to a National
Archives & Records Administration Form 13038, dated 27 Oct 05, the
applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 13 Jun 55, was discharged in
the grade of airman third class on 18 Sep 58, but with a general
(under honorable conditions) characterization. No further information
is available. [Note: Based on the FBI report (Exhibit E), the
applicant apparently went absent without leave (AWOL) in 1957. If he
had, in fact, received a general characterization as indicated on the
NA Form 13038, then he would be entitled to Department of Veterans
Affairs (DVA) benefits. Since he is asking for an upgraded discharge
in order to receive DVA benefits, he likely received the UOTHC
characterization indicated on Special Order No. S-1323. The NA Form
13038 may be in error. SAF/MRBR confirmed by email dated 8 Jan 07
that the DVA had no record of a claim from the applicant.]
On 21 Jun 06, in a 2-1 vote, the majority of the Board concluded the
applicant’s appeal for an honorable discharge should be denied and the
Director of the Air Force Review Boards Agency approved the majority
decision. In their conclusions, the Board strongly suggested the
applicant submit additional official documents, as his records were
destroyed and the details of his military service and discharge could
not be clearly or fully verified. The Board also invited the
applicant to provide information pertaining to his post-service
activities.
A copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP), which includes the Board’s
decision, rationale, and invitation for the applicant to submit
additional evidence, is provided at Exhibit C.
In a package received on 13 Oct 06, the applicant submitted a personal
statement in which he explains he was severely injured in a serious
car accident in Jul 06. He provides additional details about his
military service and personal circumstances. He also includes
character statements from his son, former employers, and a businessman
who is a deacon at the applicant’s church.
The applicant’s complete request for reconsideration, with
attachments, is at Exhibit D.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is
attached at Exhibit E
A copy of the FBI Report was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Dec 06
for review and comment within 14 days (Exhibit F). As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Based upon the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence
to the contrary, we must assume that the applicant's discharge was
proper and in compliance with appropriate directives. As the
applicant’s submissions have not countered this presumption, clemency
would be the only basis on which to recommend upgrading his discharge.
We noted the character references submitted in his behalf. However,
in view of the contents of the FBI Report, i.e., the applicant was
arrested in 1957 and released to Air Force authorities for being AWOL,
and arrested after his discharge in 1962 for petty larceny, a majority
of the Board is not persuaded the post-service information provided is
strong enough to overcome the applicant’s apparent misconduct. Based
on the paucity of official documentation, the fact that the applicant
has not refuted the contents of the FBI Report, and his limited post-
service documentation, the Board majority is not convinced that
upgrading his discharge on the basis of clemency is supportable.
_________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 19 January 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of the application.
Ms. Walker voted to upgrade the applicant’s discharge to honorable,
but does not wish to submit a Minority Report. The following
documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-00626
was considered:
Exhibit C. Record of Proceedings, dated 6 Jul 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Applicant's Letter, undated (received 13 Oct 06,
w/atchs.
Exhibit E. FBI Report.
Exhibit F. AFBCMR Letter, dated 13 Dec 06.
B.J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-00626
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on
18 September 1958, he was honorably discharged and furnished an
Honorable Discharge certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
(AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Case on XXXXXXX
After careful review of the available evidence and the
applicant’s submission, I agree with the minority member’s
recommendation to grant. The facts surrounding the applicant’s
discharge cannot be verified as his records apparently were destroyed
in the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center. Based on
the FBI Report, the applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) in 1957
and was convicted of petty larceny in 1962 following his discharge
from the Air Force in 1958. The applicant has not established that an
error or an injustice occurred with respect to his discharge process,
and I do not condone his transgressions both in and out of the
service. However, I found his post-service information and character
references persuasive and noted that, after the misdemeanor conviction
in 1962, he appears to have been a law-abiding citizen. I believe the
applicant has turned his life around and, after nearly 50 years, has
borne the adverse effects of his discharge long enough.
Therefore, on the basis of clemency, I am inclined to give this
applicant the benefit of the doubt and hereby direct his discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00626
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00626 INDEX CODE: 106.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1958 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. According to a National Archives & Records Administration Form 13038, dated 27 Oct 05, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03451
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI provided a copy of an Investigative Report pertaining to the applicant, which is at Exhibit B. However, in view of the contents of the FBI report, we are not persuasive that his discharge warrants an upgrade based on clemency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02513
After the encounter, the airman involved reported the incident to Air Force authorities. DPPRS states the applicant was separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 35-66, Discharge of Homosexuals, with an undesirable discharge. NOVEL Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2006-02513 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00008
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, has provided applicant’s arrest record which is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A copy of the FBI arrest record was forwarded to applicant on 27 February...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01750
He has provided no evidence that such an upgrade was granted since it is a copy of this proof that he is requesting. As the applicant appears unable to establish to our satisfaction that his dishonorable was upgraded and a general discharge certificate was issued as he claims, we suggest he may wish to amend his application to a request for an upgraded discharge on the basis of clemency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02694
He had served 1 year, 2 months and 6 days on active service with 8 days of lost time due to AWOL. On 17 March 1959, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his discharge be upgraded so that he may enter active duty service. ________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03067
4 INDEX CODE: 102.03, 131.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 APRIL 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was selected for augmentation in the Regular Air Force and his record be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel in the primary zone. The AFBCMR has considered these previous cases: In an application dated 18 January 1965, the applicant, a captain,...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02680 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 14 September 1957 undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an Investigation Report pertaining to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00774
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00774 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 SEP 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His other than honorable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, the facts surrounding his service in the Air Force cannot be verified. The only other basis upon which to upgrade his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02271
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-02271 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1958 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) with service characterized as Under-Other-Than-Honorable-Conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded. [Note: Court-martial records were obtained for the Board’s review--see Exhibit B.] After a thorough...