RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03596
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His discharge should be upgraded in consideration of his two previous
honorable periods of service, and the fact that he has been a fine citizen.
The applicant states that he was young and immature at the time, and was
suffering both mentally and physically from problems with his supervisor.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a copy of the DD Form 214,
Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued
in conjunction with his 23 June 1957 honorable discharge.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Army Air Corps from 26 February 1942 through 6
June 1945, as a B-24 aerial gunner and radio operator, in Europe and the
Philippine Islands. During this period, he was progressively promoted to
the grade of staff sergeant, completed a total of 30 combat missions, and
was awarded five Air Medals. In addition, his service was characterized as
honorable.
He enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 16 December 1953, for a
period of four years.
He was tried by a summary court-martial on 28 January 1954, for violating
Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Specifically,
for being incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties on 24
January 1954, as a result of previous indulgence in intoxicating liquor.
He pled not guilty to the charge, was found guilty of the charge, and
sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days, reduction to the grade
of basic airman, and forfeiture of $60.00. On that same date, the sentence
was approved and ordered executed.
He was tried by a general court-martial on 5 August 1955, for violating
Article 86 of the UCMJ. Specifically, for being Absent without Leave
(AWOL) from 4 August 1954 to 8 July 1955. He pled guilty to the charge,
was found guilty of the charge, and was sentenced to be dishonorably
discharged, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement at hard
labor for six months. The sentence was adjusted on 5 August 1955. The
sentence was approved on 12 August 1955; however, the execution of the
dishonorable discharge was suspended until he was released from
confinement, and was remitted one year after his release from confinement.
On 23 June 1957, he was honorably discharged and on 24 June 1957,
reenlisted in the RegAF for a period of four years. He was progressively
promoted to the grade of airman second class.
In a letter, dated 20 November 1957, the commander notified him of his
intent to impose nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the Manual for
Courts-Martial 1951, for being in an off-limits area on 9 November 1957.
He waived his right to a trial by court-martial and submitted no matters in
mitigation, extenuation, or defense. The commander imposed punishment
consisting of demotion to the grade of airman third class. He did not
appeal the punishment.
He was tried by a special court-martial on 13 March 1959, for violating
Article 86 of the UCMJ. Specifically, for being Absent without Leave
(AWOL) from 17 June 1958 to 20 February 1959. He was found guilty of the
charge and was sentenced to a BCD, reduction to the grade of airman basic,
confinement at hard labor for six months, and forfeiture of $70.00 per
months for six months. The sentence was adjusted on 13 March 1959 and
approved on 26 March 1959.
The convening authority approved his BCD on 1 April 1959.
On 16 April 1959, the Air Force Court of Military Review (AFCMR) affirmed
the finds of guilty and the sentence. He appealed to the Court of Military
Appeals (COMA) and his petition was denied on 19 June 1959.
On 13 August 1959, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions,
under the provisions of AFR 39-18, and issued a DD Form 259AF (BCD
Certificate). He completed 6 years, 3 months, and 27 days of active
service, which excludes 960 days of lost time (Confinement 28 Jan 54 - 27
Feb 54 (32 days), AWOL 4 Aug 54 - 8 Jul 55 (339 days), Confinement 15 Jul
55 - 22 Dec 55 (167 days), AWOL 17 Jun 58 - 20 Feb 59 (249 days), and
Confinement 21 Feb 59 - 13 Aug 59 (174 days)).
In an application, dated 13 August 1972, he requested his discharge be
upgraded to one under honorable conditions. In a letter, dated 25 June
1973, he was advised that the AFBCMR found insufficient evidence of an
error or injustice, and denied his request (Exhibit C).
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
Clarksburg, WV, indicated that on the basis of the data furnished, they
were unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLSA/JAJM states, in part, that the AFBCMR’s ability to correct a court-
martial record is limited to the actions taken by reviewing authorities
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and to action on the
sentence of courts-martial for the purpose of clemency. Since there is no
indication of an error concerning the court-martial record, any decision
regarding the applicant’s discharge would be done as a matter of clemency.
The AFLSA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the AFLSA/JAJM evaluation and states, in part, that
during World War II, he became an alcoholic and a compulsive gambler.
After his honorable discharge from the Army Air Corps, he spent a few years
on skid row selling blood and working day labor. He then reenlisted in the
Air Force and was assigned to Chanute Field, Illinois. While on a weekend
pass, he went to Chicago where he entered a bar where gambling was wide
open. He won $1,500.00 the first day and continued drinking and gambling
until he was AWOL. He turned himself in once he was broke and dried-out.
He was found guilty of desertion by a general court-martial; however, in
view of his war record, he was given a chance at rehabilitation. He
completed a one-year rehabilitation program and was subsequently honorably
discharged for reenlistment. While at Portland AFB, he had a personality
conflict with his officer-in-charge (OIC) and requested a transfer from his
commander. However, the commander refused his request. After coming in to
work late one morning, his OIC told him he did not care if he ever came to
work. His pride and self respect told him he was in a no-win situation, so
he packed his clothes and left. At the time, he felt the Air Force was
equally guilty since they did not use him in one of several jobs he was
qualified to perform. He now realizes that he should have gone to the
Judge Advocate General and left a letter of resignation. At his current
age of 81, all of his friends are gone and he is the only one left to
attest to his character.
Applicant’s complete responses, with attachments, is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Even though the applicant has provided no evidence to show that his
discharge was improper, it is our opinion that approval of some relief is
warranted in this case. It appears that he has led a stable and productive
life and there is no evidence that he has had any subsequent serious
involvement of a derogatory nature since his separation from the Air Force.
In light of the above, we believe that it would be an injustice for him to
continue to suffer the adverse effects of his BCD discharge. Therefore, on
the basis of clemency, we believe an upgrade of his discharge to general
(under honorable conditions) is warranted. Accordingly, we recommend that
his records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 13
August 1959, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under
honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-03596
in Executive Session on 28 August 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. James E. Short, Member
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Nov 02, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAFCB, dated 25 Jun 73, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFLSA/JAJM, dated 31 Jan 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Feb 03.
Exhibit F. Letter, Req for FBI Report, dated 15 Jul 03.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 16 Jul 03, w/atch.
Exhibit H. Letters, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2002-03596
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his
discharge on 13 August 1959, he was discharged with service characterized
as general (under honorable conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
The sentence was adjudged on 24 October 1957 and, on 31 October 1957, the sentence was approved and the record of trial was forwarded for action under Article 65b. The record of trial was forwarded to the Judge Advocate General of the USAF for review by a Board of Review. The second AWOL took place the day following applicant’s release from confinement for the first AWOL.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02934
On 3 July 1957, the applicant was dishonorably discharged. On 20 October 1960, he was found guilty by civil court and sentenced to 18 months of confinement. The JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation and the FBI report were forwarded to the applicant on 19 December 2003 (Exhibit D) and 4 February 2004 (Exhibit E) for review and comment.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00303
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00303 INDEX CODE: A68.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant, the son of the former servicemember who appears to be acting on behalf of his mother, requests that his father’s bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable; the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03455
On 13 October 1989, the Air Force Court of military review affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence. For his offenses, the applicant was tried and convicted by a general court martial. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002- 03455 in Executive Session on 20 May 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member Mr. Kenneth Dumm,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00810 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. Although the applicant’s adjudged sentence included a dishonorable discharge and total forfeitures, his punishment was mitigated with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03067
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03067 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 April 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. Applicant was given a second chance and the Air Force was willing to allow him to serve out...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00278
Furthermore, in view of the repeated misconduct during his short period of service that resulted in his court-martial actions and subsequent discharge and the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of the applicant’s service on the basis of clemency is warranted. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge is not favorably considered. ...
However, considering the discharge occurred over 40 years ago and considering his previous four years of honorable service and the offense that caused his BCD, DPPRS recommends clemency. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on his request. Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 8 Mar 00.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01750
He has provided no evidence that such an upgrade was granted since it is a copy of this proof that he is requesting. As the applicant appears unable to establish to our satisfaction that his dishonorable was upgraded and a general discharge certificate was issued as he claims, we suggest he may wish to amend his application to a request for an upgraded discharge on the basis of clemency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01117
The only error that may have occurred is that the applicant was sentenced to a BCD. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 23 December 1958, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).