RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01844
INDEX CODE: A67.90
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded to Honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His discharge should be honorable.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD
Form 293, Application for Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of
the United States; and his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s military records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air
Force on 17 Oct 86 as an airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years
and was progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant (E-4).
On 29 Aug 91, the applicant was notified by his commander of his
intent to recommend his involuntary discharge from the Air Force for
commission of a serious offense. On 16 Sep 91, the commander amended
the letter of notification to change the basis for the action to a
pattern of misconduct consisting of conduct prejudicial to good order
and discipline in accordance with AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47b. The
specific reasons for the action were:
a. He did, on 10 Jul 91, steal $100.00 from a fellow unit
member, for which he was reduced in grade to airman first class (E-3)
via nonjudicial punishment.
b. He did, on 12 Sep 91, disobey a lawful order given by a
security policeman; leave the scene of an automobile accident without
identifying himself to the operator of the other vehicle; and operate
a privately owned vehicle while drunk.
On 16 Sep 91, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant
acknowledged receipt of the amended letter of notification, waived his
right to an administrative discharge board and requested he receive a
General discharge.
On 3 Oct 91, the case was found to be legally sufficient and the
discharge authority approved the commander’s recommendation on 7 Oct
91, ordering the applicant’s involuntary discharge.
On 9 Oct 91, the applicant was furnished a UOTHC discharge and was
credited with 4 years, 11 months, and 22 days of active service.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit
C.
A copy of the FBI Report of Investigation and a request for post-
service information was forwarded to applicant on 23 Jul 09 for
comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in
the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record,
it appears the applicant’s UOTHC discharge for conduct prejudicial to
good order and discipline was consistent with the substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s
discretionary authority. He has provided no evidence which would lead
us to believe the characterization of his service was improper or
contrary to the provisions of the governing directive. We considered
upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the
evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting
the relief sought on that basis. In view of the foregoing, and in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists
to upgrade the applicant’s general discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2009-01844 in Executive Session on 28 Oct 09, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Panel Chair
Mr. James L. Sommer, Member
Ms. Shari Cohen, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Apr 09.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, 23 Jul 09, w/atch.
GREGORY A. PARKER
Panel Chair
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF MILITARY RECORDS
CASE TRANSMITTAL / COORDINATION RECORD
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO:
XXXXXXX BC-2009-01844
ROUTE IN TURN INITIALS DATE
1. CHIEF EXAMINER ________ ________
(Coord/Signature)
2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ________ ________
(Coordination)
3. RETURN TO EXAMINER FOR E-MAIL/FAX
4. MR. GREGORY A. PARKER ________ ________
PANEL CHAIR
(Signature on Proceedings)
5. AFBCMR (Processing)
JOHN K. VALLARIO
EXAMINER
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF MILITARY RECORDS
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR
1535 Command Drive
EE Wing 3rd Floor
Andrews AFB, MD 20762-7002
Mr. XXXXXXX
c/o Veterans Service Agency
XXXXXXXnue
XXXXXXX, NY 12180
Dear Mr. Johnson
Reference your application submitted under the provisions of AFI
36-2603 (Section 1552, 10 USC), AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01844.
After careful consideration of your application and military
records, the Board determined that the evidence you presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
Accordingly, the Board denied your application.
You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence
for consideration by the Board. In the absence of such additional
evidence, a further review of your application is not possible.
BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR
O. B. TAYLOR, JR.
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Attachment:
Record of Board Proceedings
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01881
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01881 INDEX CODE: A67.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s general...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00039
Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s general discharge for minor disciplinary infractions was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02051
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Sep 97 as an airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. The RE code of 4I is correct since the applicant was on the Control Roster at the time of his separation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-1996-03658-2
After considering the evidence provided, the Board determined it was insufficient to find error or injustice and denied the application (see the Record of Proceedings (BC-1996-03658) at Exhibit E, with attachments). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 11 June 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member Mr. Kurt...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01811
In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s UOTHC discharge. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00410
He received a reduction in grade from E-4 to E-2 and served three months confinement for his poor decisions. However, his commander made the decision to administratively discharge him, after serving a humiliating confinement, time away from family, and parading him around the base for all to see him just doing work details and going to the chow hall. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01578
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01578 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 Nov 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The results of the CY06 Line of the Air Force Force Shaping Board results be corrected to show that he was selected for retention. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03088
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03088 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be expunged from his records. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-1993-00674
For an accounting of the facts surrounding his previous request and the rationale of the Board's earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. The applicant submitted a letter dated 13 Aug 07, requesting the Board reconsider his request for upgrade of his discharge. He states his general discharge and statement of service are not corresponding. Exhibit J.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03010
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03010 (RECON of BC-1981-02511) INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded based on clemency. A summary of the evidence...