Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03909
Original file (BC-2008-03909.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-03909
                                             INDEX CODE:  100.00
      XXXXXXX                           COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Home  of  Record  (HOR)  and  legal  residence  be  changed  from  Dyer,
Tennessee, to Pangasinan, Philippines.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

At the time of his  enlistment,  he  was  told  that  he  had  to  designate
Memphis, Tennessee, as his HOR despite  the  fact  that  he  is  a  Filipino
citizen and his permanent home and family  are  still  in  the  Philippines.
After obtaining his Immigrant Alien Visa, he lived with friends of his  aunt
in Tennessee, prior to his enlistment.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts  pertaining  to  this  application,  extracted  from  the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter  prepared  by  the
appropriate office of the Air Force.   Accordingly,  there  is  no  need  to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial and states, in part, the HOR is defined as  the
place recorded as the home of the individual when enlisted or  ordered  into
a tour of active duty.  Although the applicant  did  explain  within  reason
why his HOR should be the Philippines  and  stated  that  he  could  provide
documentation to support the change, he  has  failed  to  respond  to  their
request for such documentation.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  30
January 2009 for review and comments, within 30 days.  However, as  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
03909 in Executive Session on 14 May 2009, under the provisions of  AFI  36-
2603:

            Mr. Anthony P. Reardon, Panel Chair
            Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
            Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Oct 08, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 13 Jan 09.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jan 09.




                                   ANTHONY P. REARDON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | bc-2008-04097

    Original file (bc-2008-04097.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04097 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and reentry code be changed to allow him to enlist in the Army. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00758

    Original file (BC-2009-00758.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating the RE Code of 2C is correct based on the applicant’s entry level separation with uncharacterized service. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00758 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02003

    Original file (BC-2008-02003.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01730

    Original file (BC-2009-01730.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Extending his HOS entitlement one additional year would allow him to avoid additional financial hardship should he find employment outside of his local area and have to move, and would provide him the additional time he needs to get his personal affairs in order. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and they could find no basis in law to extend an entitlement past six years from his date of retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00948

    Original file (BC-2009-00948.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 29 Mar 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00948 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01453

    Original file (BC-2008-01453.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01453 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code be changed from 2B “Separated with a general, or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge, to 1T “Air National Guard and United States Air Force Reserve airmen serving on voluntary or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00464

    Original file (BC-2008-00464.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00474 INDEX: 112.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Brunswick, Ohio to Carter, South Dakota. DPSOA states the HOR is defined as the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time when enlisted, commissioned, appointed, inducted or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02542

    Original file (BC-2008-02542.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The commander informed the applicant of his rights, to include being represented by legal counsel and presenting his case to an administrative discharge board and, on 3 December 1987, he waived his right to present his case to an administrative discharge board, contingent on his receiving no less than a general discharge. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02542 in Executive Session on 11 February 2009...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00338

    Original file (BC-2009-00338.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon was authorized on 18 June 2003 for Air Force Active Duty, Reserve, and Guard personnel who completed a contingency deployment after 1 October 1999. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03987

    Original file (BC-2008-03987.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45, Decorations, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy of the United States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided such wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer. In this regard, we note that in addition to authorizing entitlement to the PH to those individuals who are severely frostbitten while actually engaged in combat against...