Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02242
Original file (BC-2010-02242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02242 

COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His reentry (RE) code of “3A” (First term airman who 
separates before completing 36 months on current enlistment and 
who has no known disqualifying factors or ineligibility 
conditions except grade, skill level, and insufficient Total 
Active Federal Military Service) be changed to allow him to 
reenlist in the military. 

 

2. His separation code and narrative reason for separation be 
changed to reflect his release from active duty was due to “Force 
Shaping” rather than “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He received a Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) eligibility 
certificate; however, when he went to use it to purchase a home, 
the DVA loan was denied. The DVA indicated they disapproved his 
loan due to line #28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD 
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, a letter to his local Congressman, copies of his DD 
Form 214, a copy of his separation order, an electronic 
communication in regard to his separation, and DVA documentation. 

 

A copy of the applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, 
is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 11 May 2004, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 
in the grade of airman basic (E-1). He was promoted to the grade 
of airman (E-2) with a date of rank of 11 November 2004. 

 

On 14 April 2005, the applicant requested early separation under 
the Fiscal Year 2004 Limited Active Duty Service Commitment 
(LADSC) Waiver Program. His date of separation was approved in 
accordance with Military Personnel Flight Memorandum (MPFM) 04-
35, dated 11 August 2004. 

 


The applicant was honorably discharged effective 22 June 2005 
with an RE code of “3A,” a separation code of “MND,” and a 
narrative reason for separation of “Miscellaneous/General 
Reasons.” 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states that according to 
MPFM 04-35, personnel who separate under the LADSC Waiver Program 
will do so under the miscellaneous provisions of Air Force 
Instruction 36-3208. Based on the documentation on file in the 
master personnel records, the applicant’s discharge was 
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of 
the discharge regulation. The applicant did not submit any 
evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in 
the separation processing. He provided no facts warranting a 
change to his separation action. His narrative reason for 
separation of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” is correct. 

 

The complete DPSOS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant does 
not give a reason his RE code is incorrect, but states he was 
told it is not correct. After reviewing his master personnel 
record along with the documentation he provided, the applicant’s 
RE code of “3A” is correct, as he only completed 1 year, 1 month, 
and 12 days of his four-year enlistment. According to AFI 36-
2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, Chapter 3, all four-year 
enlistees who separate prior to completing 36 months of service 
receive an RE code of “3A,” as long as a negative RE code does 
not apply. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 December 2010, for review and comment within 
30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-02242 in Executive Session on 3 March 2011, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02242: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 9 Nov 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Nov 10. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Dec 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02059

    Original file (BC-2008-02059.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and AF IMT 31, Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02885

    Original file (BC-2008-02885.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00384

    Original file (BC-2013-00384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00384 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Reduction in Force (RIF).” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00067

    Original file (BC-2011-00067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00067 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and separation program designator (SPD) code be reviewed. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged under Phase II of the force shaping...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05460

    Original file (BC-2012-05460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05460 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Miscellaneous/General Reasons) and corresponding separation code of “KND” be changed to reflect voluntary separation from the Air Force under a reduction in force program. AF IMT 31, Airman’s Request for Early...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04292

    Original file (BC-2010-04292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04292 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 3A, which denotes “First-term airman who separates before completing 36 months (60 months for 6-year enlistee) on current enlistment and who has no known disqualifying factors or ineligibility conditions except grade, skill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01762

    Original file (BC 2014 01762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She separated from the Air Force under the Fiscal Year 2007, Air Force - Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service (LADSC) Waiver Program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Consequently, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02735

    Original file (BC-2005-02735.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02735 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 FEB 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed from miscellaneous/general reasons to reduction in force and his records be corrected to reflect his eligibility for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00752

    Original file (BC-2008-00752.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping program. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00870

    Original file (BC 2014 00870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed to reflect “Reduction in Force” at the convenience of the government. His DD Form 214 reflects the narrative reason for separation as “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” The remaining relevant...