RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-04091
INDEX CODE: 113.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Inactive Ready Reserve (IRR) service count as active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was misinformed regarding his eligibility to join the Regular Air Force
as an enlisted member after being involuntarily separated from the Air
Force as an officer and would like the one year and six months of inactive
reserve time to count as active duty time. The information was proven to
be wrong which enabled him to later re-join the Air Force as an enlisted
member.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement, a
letter from his commander, a presidential certificate, a DD Form 214,
training records, a copy of his personal identification card, and an ATC
letter.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 15 October 1986, the applicant enlisted as an airmen first class (E-3)
into the Air Force Reserve Obligated Reserve Section (ORS) for the period
of six years.
On 29 April 1988 the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force
Reserve and relieved from his enlisted status effective the same date.
On 30 April 1988, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the
Reserve of the Air Force.
On 1 October 1988, the applicant was voluntarily ordered to Extended Active
Duty (EAD) in the Regular Air Force.
On 14 October 1989, the applicant was eliminated from Specialized
Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUNT).
On 19 December 1989, the applicant was involuntarily separated from the
Regular Air Force with an honorable discharge.
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
indicates the applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6). His Total Active Federal Military
Service Date (TAFMSD) is 25 March 1990.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPR recommends denial. Regarding the applicant's reenlistment
entitlement DPSIPR states the applicant was a member of the Air Force
Reserve Obligated Reserve Section (ORS) and not the Regular Air Force. As
a member of the ORS there was no entitlement to reenlist. Title 10, USC
8258, provides a reenlistment entitlement to former enlisted members of the
Regular Air Force not officers.
The complete DPSIPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states that he never assumed that he had a statutory
entitlement; however, he wanted to know if there was any way that he could
continue in the Air Force as an enlisted member even though he had a
reserve commission. The applicant asserts that in 1989, he was not given
the appropriate information concerning his eligibility to continue in an
active duty capacity. He is asking for the time that he could have been in
the Regular Air Force to count as active duty and not inactive service
time. The information provided to him in 1989 was proven to be wrong as he
was allowed to re-enter the Regular Air Force in 1991 as an enlisted
member.
His complete submission is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case. The applicant's
assertion of miscounseling is duly noted; however it appears because his
prior enlisted status was not in the Regular Air Force, he was not entitled
to continue on active duty in an enlisted status. Furthermore, Air Force
policy in effect at the time prohibited his enlistment once separated from
commissioned service. Therefore, absent evidence that the applicant was
denied rights to which he was entitled or that the appropriate standards
were not applied, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issue involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
04091 in Executive Session on 2 October 2008, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Mr. James G. Neighbors, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2007-04091:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 September 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPR, dated 20 August 2008.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 August 2008.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 September 2008.
ALAN A. BLOMGREN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01801
On 29 March 1989, the discharge authority directed he be discharged with a general discharge. On 1 December 1989, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-01801 in Executive Session on 26 July 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Ms. B J White-Olson, Panel Chair Ms....
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02668
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS At the time he was disciplined, he requested that he be discharged and was subsequently rendered a general discharge. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02668 in Executive Session on 16 December 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03439
A member’s Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) is established from their Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) in accordance with Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 14507, which requires that a Line-of- the Air Force colonel, not selected for promotion to the grade of brigadier general, be separated not later than the first day of the month following completion of 30-years commissioned service. Although applicant contends he had a break in service from November 1982 to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03208
The period he was assigned to ORS and NNRPS was in accordance with current Air Force policies and procedures; as a result, DPO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for a break in service for the period of July 2000 to September 2003. Applicant notes the Air Force evaluation does not state why the laws in AFI 36-2115 dated 1 October 1997, are used instead of the new AFI dated 8 April 2005. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02440
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. We must look at what caused the injury or condition, activities taking place at the time, and resulting disability. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01020
The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support separation and recommended he be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without probation and rehabilitation (P&R). After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in accordance with the appropriate directives. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00251
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00251 INDEX CODE: 108.07 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 JULY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertension and right elbow muscle injury be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program so he may...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03854
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03854 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, bipolar disorder, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In support of his request, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01254
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01254 INDEX CODE: 135.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 October 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty, block 12c, be changed from 9 years, 11 months and 29 days total active duty to 10 years. The last...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01766
AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and...