Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04091
Original file (BC-2007-04091.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-04091
            INDEX CODE:  113.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  YES


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Inactive Ready Reserve (IRR) service count as active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was misinformed regarding his eligibility to join the Regular  Air  Force
as an enlisted member after  being  involuntarily  separated  from  the  Air
Force as an officer and would like the one year and six months  of  inactive
reserve time to count as active duty time.  The information  was  proven  to
be wrong which enabled him to later re-join the Air  Force  as  an  enlisted
member.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a  personal  statement,  a
letter from his commander,  a  presidential  certificate,  a  DD  Form  214,
training records, a copy of his personal identification  card,  and  an  ATC
letter.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 15 October 1986, the applicant enlisted as an airmen  first  class  (E-3)
into the Air Force Reserve Obligated Reserve Section (ORS)  for  the  period
of six years.

On 29 April 1988 the applicant was honorably discharged from the  Air  Force
Reserve and relieved from his enlisted status effective the same date.

On 30 April 1988, the applicant was appointed a  second  lieutenant  in  the
Reserve of the Air Force.




On 1 October 1988, the applicant was voluntarily ordered to Extended  Active
Duty (EAD) in the Regular Air Force.

On  14  October  1989,  the  applicant  was  eliminated   from   Specialized
Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUNT).

On 19 December 1989, the applicant  was  involuntarily  separated  from  the
Regular Air Force with an honorable discharge.

Information extracted from  the  Military  Personnel  Data  System  (MilPDS)
indicates the applicant is currently serving in the  Regular  Air  Force  in
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).  His Total  Active  Federal  Military
Service Date (TAFMSD) is 25 March 1990.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPR  recommends  denial.   Regarding  the  applicant's  reenlistment
entitlement DPSIPR states the applicant  was  a  member  of  the  Air  Force
Reserve Obligated Reserve Section (ORS) and not the Regular Air  Force.   As
a member of the ORS there was no entitlement to  reenlist.   Title  10,  USC
8258, provides a reenlistment entitlement to former enlisted members of  the
Regular Air Force not officers.

The complete DPSIPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant  states  that  he  never  assumed  that  he  had  a  statutory
entitlement; however, he wanted to know if there was any way that  he  could
continue in the Air Force as  an  enlisted  member  even  though  he  had  a
reserve commission.  The applicant asserts that in 1989, he  was  not  given
the appropriate information concerning his eligibility  to  continue  in  an
active duty capacity.  He is asking for the time that he could have been  in
the Regular Air Force to count as  active  duty  and  not  inactive  service
time.  The information provided to him in 1989 was proven to be wrong as  he
was allowed to re-enter the  Regular  Air  Force  in  1991  as  an  enlisted
member.

His complete submission is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________






THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits  of  the  case.   The  applicant's
assertion of miscounseling is duly noted; however  it  appears  because  his
prior enlisted status was not in the Regular Air Force, he was not  entitled
to continue on active duty in an enlisted status.   Furthermore,  Air  Force
policy in effect at the time prohibited his enlistment once  separated  from
commissioned service.  Therefore, absent evidence  that  the  applicant  was
denied rights to which he was entitled or  that  the  appropriate  standards
were not applied, we agree with the opinion and recommendation  of  the  Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim  of  an  error
or injustice.  In the absence of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issue  involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
04091 in Executive Session on 2 October 2008, under the  provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Panel Chair
      Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
      Mr. James G. Neighbors, Member


The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2007-04091:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 September 2007, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPR, dated 20 August 2008.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 August 2008.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 12 September 2008.




                                   ALAN A. BLOMGREN
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01801

    Original file (BC-2007-01801.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 March 1989, the discharge authority directed he be discharged with a general discharge. On 1 December 1989, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-01801 in Executive Session on 26 July 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Ms. B J White-Olson, Panel Chair Ms....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02668

    Original file (BC-2008-02668.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS At the time he was disciplined, he requested that he be discharged and was subsequently rendered a general discharge. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02668 in Executive Session on 16 December 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03439

    Original file (BC-2006-03439.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A member’s Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) is established from their Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) in accordance with Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 14507, which requires that a Line-of- the Air Force colonel, not selected for promotion to the grade of brigadier general, be separated not later than the first day of the month following completion of 30-years commissioned service. Although applicant contends he had a break in service from November 1982 to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03208

    Original file (BC-2006-03208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The period he was assigned to ORS and NNRPS was in accordance with current Air Force policies and procedures; as a result, DPO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for a break in service for the period of July 2000 to September 2003. Applicant notes the Air Force evaluation does not state why the laws in AFI 36-2115 dated 1 October 1997, are used instead of the new AFI dated 8 April 2005. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02440

    Original file (BC-2007-02440.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. We must look at what caused the injury or condition, activities taking place at the time, and resulting disability. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01020

    Original file (BC-2007-01020.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support separation and recommended he be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without probation and rehabilitation (P&R). After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in accordance with the appropriate directives. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00251

    Original file (BC-2007-00251.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00251 INDEX CODE: 108.07 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 JULY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertension and right elbow muscle injury be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program so he may...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03854

    Original file (BC-2007-03854.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03854 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, bipolar disorder, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In support of his request, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01254

    Original file (BC-2006-01254.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01254 INDEX CODE: 135.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 October 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty, block 12c, be changed from 9 years, 11 months and 29 days total active duty to 10 years. The last...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01766

    Original file (BC-2008-01766.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and...