RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01766
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code "2X" (First-term, second-term or career airman
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective
Reenlistment Program) and separation code "JBK" (Completion of
required active service) be changed to allow him to enlist in the
Reserves.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was denied reenlistment due to a one-time incident involving a
night of alcohol and not reporting to work on time.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 7 May 85, the applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the
Regular Air Force. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
sergeant having assumed the grade effective and with a date of rank of
7 May 88.
On 14 Apr 92, the applicant’s supervisor initiated an Air Force Form
418 and non-recommended him for reenlistment. On 25 Jun 92, the
commander concurred with non-recommendation and denied the applicant
reenlistment. On 29 Jun 92, he acknowledged his commander’s decision
and submitted an appeal on 1 Jul 92. On 26 June 92, the appeal
authority denied his appeal.
On 28 Nov 92, he was discharged with an honorable discharge. He
served 7 years, 6 months and 20 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states commanders have selective
reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. SRP considers the
service members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, unfavorable
information from any substantiated source, the service member’s
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and or the service
member’s ability or inability to meet required training and duty
performance levels. DPSOA further states no evidence was found to
indicate an error or an injustice occurred; nor did the applicant
submit any. The applicant was denied reenlistment based on his
supervisor’s recommendation and substantiated unfavorable information.
AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the documentation
on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation. DPSOS further noted that the denial of the
enlistment entitled the applicant to one-half separation pay.
AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and requests the
Board consider his first term performance history in the final
decision. He admits he made many poor decisions, one was choosing to
stay in a relationship with someone with a substance abuse problem
that he did not understand or had seen prior to being married.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden of proof of the existence of either an error or an
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2008-01766 in Executive Session on 2 Oct 08 under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Mr. James G. Neighbors, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Apr 08, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 May 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 22 Jul 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 22 Aug 08.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
ALAN A. BLOMGREN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01497
On 2 Oct 89, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. He was discharged on 11 Oct 89. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of either...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01093
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01093 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Code (SC) of "LBK" (Completion of Required Service, and denied reenlistment with half separation pay) be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01093
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01093 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Code (SC) of "LBK" (Completion of Required Service, and denied reenlistment with half separation pay) be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01993
On 12 February 2007, the applicant's supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, and non-recommended him for reenlistment. DPSOA found no evidence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry in the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02862
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides expanded statements, documentation pertaining to his indebtedness, previous Board decisions, and other documents associated with the matter under review. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00707
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00707 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Article 15, nonjudicial punishment (NJP), and all actions associated with the punishment be removed; she be reinstated to active duty with her original date of rank; and her reentry (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to return to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03241
He has provided no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-03241 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00022
He feels he should have been referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) prior to his non-selection for reenlistment. A complete copy of the DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibits D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 days. We note the applicants contention that he should have been considered by an MEB for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01217
The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designation (SPD) codeJBK (less than 6 years of active service) with a correspondingnarrative reason for separation of Completion of Required ActiveService because the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ExpirationTerm of Service may be involuntarily accelerated. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record, the discharge to include thecharacterization of...