Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01254
Original file (BC-2006-01254.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01254
            INDEX CODE:  135.02

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED: NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  8 October 2007



_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty,
block 12c, be changed from 9 years, 11 months and 29 days total active
duty to 10 years.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

When he received the DD Form 214 in 1994, he asked the question of why
he was short one day, and the answer was because of  his  reenlistment
date.

In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided copies of her  DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge  from  Active  Duty,  AF
Form 100, Request and  Authorization  for  Separation,  AF  Form  973,
Request  and  Authorization  for  Change  of  Administrative   Orders,
personal data sheet, and Application for Ready Reserve Assignment.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular  Air  Force  on  2  July  1984.   He
reenlisted on 29 July 1988, after an extension. The last  reenlistment
in the Air Force was done on 1 July 1992 for a  period  of  two  years
which made his normal date of separation   30  June 1994. He served  9
years, 11 months, and 29 days on active duty.   On  1  July  1994,  he
transferred to the Air Force Reserve  in  the  grade  of  E-4.  He  is
currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade  of  technical
sergeant.


_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPSD1 recommends denial and  states  that  the  DD  Form  214  is
correct.

ARPC/DPSD1’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
19 May 2006 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this  date,
this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  We find  no  evidence  of  an
error in this case and after careful  consideration  of  the  evidence
presented, we are not persuaded that he has  been  the  victim  of  an
injustice. We agree with the opinion and  recommendation  of  the  Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain  his
burden of having suffered either an error or injustice.  Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________




The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01254 in Executive Session on 22 June 2006, under the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPSD1, dated 18 May 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 May 06.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01260

    Original file (BC-2006-01260.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Aug 06 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00958

    Original file (BC-2006-00958.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 136.00 BC-2006-00958 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00482

    Original file (BC-2008-00482.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPB recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the non- selection to “not count.” The applicant did compete for promotion; however, his record was incomplete at the time of the board. Once the signature dates are corrected to reflect dates prior to the promotion board, the applicant will be entitled to special selection board (SSB) consideration in lieu of the FY08 Major Promotion Selection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01263

    Original file (BC-2005-01263.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01263 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 OCT 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by a special selection board (SSB) for the FY05 Colonel Line and NonLine Promotion Board with his Officer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01005

    Original file (BC-2006-01005.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAOT recommended denial with respect to reinstatement of his pilot slot; however, they support granting an age waiver to allow the applicant to compete for a pilot training slot on the next available active duty selection board, tentatively scheduled for Jan 07. DPAOT consensus is that if an individual earned a pilot training slot, is found medically disqualified and then medically...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01337

    Original file (BC-2005-01337.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01337 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the FY05 Air Force Reserve Line and Nonline Colonel Promotion Selection Board. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00419

    Original file (BC-2006-00419.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00419 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUG 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 8 August 2005, be removed from her records and her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01499

    Original file (BC-2006-01499.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    BC-2006-01499 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01186GT

    Original file (BC-2006-01186GT.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2006-01186 INDEX NUMBER: 135.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01192

    Original file (BC-2006-01192.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, and Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, considered this application on 22 June 2006. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPA, dtd 26 May 06, w/atchs AFBCMR BC-2006-01192 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...