RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02430
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXX IV COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4I, “Serving on Control
Roster,” be changed to 1P or 1M.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His RE code of 4I is unjust due to the reasons why he was on the
Control Roster. The reason he was on the Control Roster was
because he sent an inappropriate email to a friend on a government
computer. He states, “After I pressed send I new that I should not
have sent the e-mail, but by that time it was too late.” He knows
that he should not have sent the e-mail; however, the punishment
does not fit the crime; this was his first offense. He has not
done anything like that since, and will not do it again. This was
during the time of the first round of the Air Force Force-Shaping
and the Control Roster made him eligible to be discharged.
He would like the RE code changed so he can have an opportunity to
continue his service to his country in the Air National Guard or
Air Force Reserve.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
issued on 2 Sep 04.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 Sep 94 for a
period of four years in the grade of airman first class (A1C/E-3).
He reenlisted on 26 Dec 97 for a period of six years. Applicant
was progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant with an
effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 1 Nov 00.
A resume of applicant’s enlisted performance reports (EPR) profile
follows:
PERIOD CLOSING OVERALL EVALUATION
02 Mar 00 4
02 Mar 01 3
02 Mar 02 3
02 Mar 03 4
02 Mar 04 4
On 2 Sep 04, applicant was honorably discharged under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208 and issued an RE code of 4I. He was
credited with 9 years, 11 months, and 25 days of active duty
service.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommended denial. The
applicant acknowledges he was on the Control Roster for misconduct;
however, a review of his records failed to determine the date he
was placed on the Control Roster. Individuals are placed on the
Control Roster for a period of six months.
RE codes 1P or 1M are not valid codes for separation. The
applicant failed to prove or provide information the RE code is
incorrect, and therefore, his records should be considered correct
as written. However, if the applicant has evidence to show the
effective date or the expiration date of the Control Roster action,
the Board may consider changing the RE code.
HQ AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant notes that the Control Roster would have expired by the
time he was discharged. He was placed on the Control Roster in
Mar 04, about the start of the FY04 Force Shaping Rollback Program.
Under the Force-Shaping Rollback Program, the Control Roster made
him eligible to have his date of separation (DOS) pushed back. He
then had 120 days before his DOS, in which time the Control Roster
expired. He provides a copy of his DOS Rollback Separation
Notification letter; which was written after his Control Roster and
his DOS was after the Control Roster should have expired.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, we are not persuaded that he
has been the victim of an error or injustice. At the time members
are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code
predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances
of their separation. Applicant’s RE code of 4I accurately reflects
that he was serving on the Control Roster and given the
circumstances surrounding his separation, we believe the RE code
issued was in accordance with the governing instruction. Should
the applicant be able to present evidence substantiating his
removal from the Control Roster prior to his separation, we would
be willing to reconsider his application. Therefore, in the
absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2007-02430 in Executive Session on 13 December 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 07, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Sep 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Oct 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
LAURENCE M. GRONER
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03900
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. The applicant was separated under the Rollback Program with an honorable character of service and an RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00574
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00574 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4I (serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 10 Jul 06, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for failure to provide a proper family care plan. The applicant was discharged...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01009
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01009 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, secondterm or career airmen not yet considered under the SRP) or another code that would allow him to reenlist into military service. After a...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00752
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping program. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05025
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster action had already expired. On the same date, the applicants commander non- selected her for reenlistment. On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second- term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) based on her...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of JBK (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02262
He was serving on the control roster at the time of his discharge. A complete copy of the DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...