Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03900
Original file (BC-2011-03900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03900 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “4I” (Serving on 
Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military 
service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was placed on the Control Roster (CR) due to one of his troops 
being involved in an investigation with four other service 
members of the squadron. He was told the case was dropped, and 
he was no longer on the Control Roster, and was free to separate 
under the force shaping program. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty, indicates he enlisted in the Air Force on 
3 Oct 96. He was honorably released from active duty on 
15 Jan 05 with an RE code of 4I and was transferred to the Air 
Force Reserve. He was honorably discharged from the Air Force 
Reserve on 15 Jan 08. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, noting the applicant has not 
provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE 
code. The applicant was separated under the Rollback Program 
with an honorable character of service and an RE code of 4I 
(Serving on Control Roster). He blames his troop for him being 
on the CR; however, members are not placed on the CR for someone 


else’s actions as the applicant contends. The applicant also 
states he was no longer on the CR and free to separate under 
force shaping; however, the Rollback Program is not a voluntary 
program and service members who separate under it are not 
voluntarily separated. In addition, separation pay is not 
provided to service members who voluntarily separate. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 16 Dec 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03900 in Executive Session on 15 May 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03900 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, 14 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02430

    Original file (BC-2007-02430.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, if the applicant has evidence to show the effective date or the expiration date of the Control Roster action, the Board may consider changing the RE code. HQ AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the Control Roster would have expired by the time he was discharged. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Sep 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589

    Original file (BC-2012-03589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of “JBK” (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00574

    Original file (BC-2010-00574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00574 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4I (serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 10 Jul 06, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for failure to provide a proper family care plan. The applicant was discharged...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00752

    Original file (BC-2008-00752.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping program. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463

    Original file (BC 2013 03463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02787

    Original file (BC-2012-02787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 17 Feb 2011, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05025

    Original file (BC 2013 05025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster action had already expired. On the same date, the applicant’s commander non- selected her for reenlistment. On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second- term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) based on her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103

    Original file (BC 2014 01103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03526

    Original file (BC 2014 03526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code “4I” which denotes “Serving on Control Roster” be changed to “3K” which denotes “Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies” or “3B” which denotes “1st or 2nd term or career airman ineligible to reenlist.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00784

    Original file (BC-2010-00784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal letter and copies of his AF IMT 74, Record of Individual Counseling and Letter of Reprimand. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSI recommends denial. There is no evidence of error or injustice...