RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00752
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry code of "4H," which denotes "Serving suspended punishment
pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)," be
changed to a code that will enable him to reenter another branch of
service.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received
a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping
program. Being on leave saved him from falling under the Force Shaping
program and he volunteered for early separation to attend college. Had he
not volunteered to separate he would have been eligible to reenlist.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of a notification
memorandum.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 21
June 1998.
The applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for the following:
a. He did at or near Osan Air Base, Republic of Korea, on or
about 25 December 2003, disrespect a general officer.
b. He did at or near Osan Air Base, Republic of Korea, on or
about 25 December 2003, use provoking words to a general officer.
c. He did at or near Osan Air Base, Republic of Korea, on or
about 25 December 2003, display disorderly conduct, which conduct was of a
nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
His punishment consisted of a reduction in grade of airman basic, with
reduction below airman first class suspended through 21 July 2004 (with a
new date of rank for airman first class of 23 January 2004), restriction to
Osan Air Base and a reprimand.
The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 7 September 2004
in the grade of airman first class. He served 6 years, 2 months and 17
days on active duty. He served as a Munitions Systems Journeyman.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant was selected for
separation under the enlisted DOS rollback program. Eligibility criteria
for the enlisted rollback program applied to airmen in all AFSCs with
reentry code of 2X (denied reenlistment), 4H (serving suspended punishment
pursuant to Article 15, UCMJ) or 4I (serving on the Control Roster). The
applicant received an Article 15 on 26 January 2004 for disrespect to a
general officer. The applicant’s reentry code was 4H and he was selected
for separation by his commander.
The applicant was selected for separation under the DOS rollback program
and was authorized one-half separation pay. The applicant should be
advised if the requested action is approved by the board, he may be subject
to recoupment of the $7,134.75 he received for separation pay as confirmed
by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. DPSOS also notes the amount
of separation pay reflected on his DD Form 214 is incorrect and should be
corrected to reflect $7,134.75 vice $19,026.00.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no facts
warranting a change.
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under
Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. However, due to the reduction
in grade, coupled with the fact that the applicant was considered a second-
termer and held the grade of airman first class at the time of his release,
DPSOA recommends his RE code be corrected to show 4E – Grade is airman
first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for
6-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or, grade is airman first class
or below and the airman is a second-term or career airman.
MPFM 04-05, implemented the FY04 Force Shaping Program. This program was
developed to assist the Air Force in meeting end strength requirements and
to properly shape the force by authorizing a DOS rollback for identified
enlisted personnel. According to attachment three of this MPFM, members
with RE codes of 2X, 4H, or 4I with less than 14 years of TAFMS were
eligible for commanders to accelerate the DOS of airmen with these codes to
equal to 120 days from the commanders notification of release from active
service. However, as stated in the attachment Exclusions: (c) “Airman are
not required to separate if the reenlistment ineligibility condition, which
qualified them for early separation, is eliminated before their rollback
DOS. The applicant’s suspended punishment expired on 21 July 2004;
therefore, he was ineligible for separation under the program.
According to the applicant’s claims, he volunteered to accept the early out
to attend school. The applicant was not eligible for separation under this
program. Nevertheless, the applicant did separate from active duty in the
grade of airman first class while serving on his second-term of enlistment.
According to AFI 36-2602, RE code 4E is the correct code for airmen
"...whose grade airman first class or below and the airman is a second-term
or career airman." The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 27 June 2008, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice warranting some relief. In this
respect, according to the applicant’s discharge documents, he was
discharged from the Air Force under the DOS Rollback provisions of the FY04
Force Shaping program, Phase II. However, as noted by AFPC/DPSOA, his
suspended reduction under Article 15 expired prior to his separation date
and he was no longer eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback
provision. DPSOA notes that because he was reduced to the grade of airman
first class as a result of his Article 15 punishment, his correct RE code
should have reflected 4E. Although the evidence of record shows otherwise,
the applicant contends on the other hand, that he "was saved from the cut"
and voluntarily requested separation (presumably under the Miscellaneous
Separation provision of the Force Shaping program, Phase I). While
changing his RE code to 4E may not provide him the level of relief
requested, it appears that regardless of the provision under which he was
separated, 4E should have been the proper RE code. We carefully considered
his request to change the RE code to a code that will allow him to
reenlist; however, we are not persuaded by the applicant's assertions that
the requested relief is warranted. Accordingly, we recommend his records
be corrected to the extent indicated below.
4. We note the comments of DPSOS stating that the separation pay received
is incorrectly reflected on his DD Form 214 (which will be corrected
administratively) and that approval of the applicant's request would result
in a loss of his entitlement to separation pay. We have been advised by
the Defense Finance and Accounting Service that since the assigned
separation code will remain unchanged, there will be no change in his
entitlement to separation pay.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 7
September 2004, his reentry code was 4E.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-
00752 in Executive Session on 16 September 2008, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following
documentary evidence pertaining to was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 February 2008, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 6 June 2008.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 June 2008.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 June 2008.
JOSEPH D. YOUNT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2008-00752
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXX, be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on
7 September 2004, his reentry code was 4E.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01938
Specifically, he was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation. In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, “Airmen separating with RE code 4H or 4I will be separated with SPD code JBK.” He was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation thereby validating the SPD and RE code he received. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02430
However, if the applicant has evidence to show the effective date or the expiration date of the Control Roster action, the Board may consider changing the RE code. HQ AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the Control Roster would have expired by the time he was discharged. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Sep 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04395
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Therefore, we believe the applicants records should be corrected as indicated below. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03676
DPSOS notes the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change and his discharge, to include his characterization of service, was within the discharge authoritys discretion. DPSOA states the applicant was ineligible for reenlistment and was discharged under the Air Force Rollback Program with an honorable character of service on 15 Mar 07 after serving 10 months and 14 days on active duty. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00067
While serving in the Air Force he had all but one 5 Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs). He received $10,314.00 in separation pay and received a 2X RE Code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of JBK (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00553
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She voluntarily separated from the military under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program and received an honorable discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 April 2008. The Air Force office of primary responsibility (AFPC/DPSOA) notes that AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, provides commanders Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) selection or nonselection...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01987
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of character reference letters, her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States; letters recommendation, and extracts from her master personnel record. DPSOA states the applicants RE code of 4H is the only description applicable for members serving a suspended Article 15 punishment. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02475
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. He has never done any of the actions he was accused of by the three airmen. Moreover, he has not provided substantial evidence that but for the Article 15 he would have been selected for reenlistment.