RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00574
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 4I (serving on the Control Roster) be
changed to allow him to reenter military service.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes the RE code is unjust because for the first four
years the Air Force was completely aware of his spouses medical
condition and everything was done in accordance with Air Force
regulations.
While his unit was preparing for deployment, the medical group
decided that they were no longer comfortable with his spouses
condition and their family care plan, so with the help of the
commander and force-shaping policies he was discharged. In
spite of his efforts, nothing could be done. He has been trying
to return to active duty; however, he has not been successful.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, issued in conjunction with his 15 Mar 07 discharge, and
other supporting documents from his service while on active
duty.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force, on 14 May 02
and was progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman
(E-4/SrA).
On 10 Jul 06, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for
failure to provide a proper family care plan. On 20 Nov 06, the
applicant received another LOR for failure to leave a counseling
session after being requested to leave (specifically, his
spouse). The applicant was ineligible to reenlist because he
was on the control roster and was subject to be processed for
separation under the Fiscal Year (FY) Force Shaping Date of
Separation (DOS) Rollback. The applicants supervisor
recommended him for reenlistment; however, his commander did not
select him for reenlistment.
The applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-
3208, on 15 Mar 07, with completion of required active service,
and issued an RE code of 4I. He was credited with 4 years,
10 months, and 2 days of active duty service.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The RE code of 4I is correct
since the applicant was on the control roster at the time of
separation. The applicant states this error is unjust because
for the first four-year enlistment, the Air Force was completely
aware of his wifes medical condition. However, the control
roster, which made him ineligible to reenlist and subsequently
led to his discharge, was a result of his actions, not his
wifes medical condition.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reiterated his original contentions and further
explained the events surrounding him receiving LORs, being
placed on the control roster and an Unfavorable Information File
(UIF), which subsequently led to his discharge. After several
attempts to appeal the commanders actions, he and his wife
decided that it was best to separate. They both wanted to
remain in the Air Force and he honored his military service, and
would like to rejoin the military and continue their life as
proud military members.
The applicants complete response, with attachments is at
Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The
applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we are not
persuaded that he has been the victim of an error or injustice.
At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are
furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their
service and the circumstances of their separation. The
applicants RE code of 4I accurately reflects that he was
serving on the control roster and given the circumstances
surrounding his separation, we believe the RE code issued was in
accordance with the governing instruction. While we are
sympathetic to the applicants request, as noted in the
evaluation from the Air Force office of primary responsibility,
the applicants placement on the control roster was a result of
his own misconduct, not his spouses medical condition.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00574 in Executive Session on 13 October 2010,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Feb 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 31 Mar 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Apr 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00784
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal letter and copies of his AF IMT 74, Record of Individual Counseling and Letter of Reprimand. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSI recommends denial. There is no evidence of error or injustice...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02430
However, if the applicant has evidence to show the effective date or the expiration date of the Control Roster action, the Board may consider changing the RE code. HQ AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the Control Roster would have expired by the time he was discharged. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Sep 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03900
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. The applicant was separated under the Rollback Program with an honorable character of service and an RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01519
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01519 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) of 4I (Serving on Control Roster) and his separation code (SPD) of JFT (Physical Standards) be changed to waiverable codes. A medical board determined he was fit for service; however, he was discharged for failing his physical...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00461
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00461 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenlist into military service. Accordingly, if the Board is not compelled to grant the relief he seeks, his record will be administratively corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03715
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03715 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive a reenlistment (RE) code that would enable her to reenlist in the Air Force or at least, in the Air National Guard (ANG) and that the following be removed from her record: 1. While she contends she received...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02051
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Sep 97 as an airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. The RE code of 4I is correct since the applicant was on the Control Roster at the time of his separation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...