Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2003-03364-2
Original file (BC-2003-03364-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03364
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In the applicant’s request for  reconsideration,  he  requests  that  he  be
awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board  on  10 March  2004.
For  an  accounting  of  the  facts  and   circumstances   surrounding   the
applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by  the  Board,
see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.

In  an  application  dated  2  September  2008,   the   applicant   requests
reconsideration.  He states the 8th Security  Police  Squadron  was  awarded
the PUC and  was  unintentionally  omitted  from  the  orders  awarding  the
decoration (Exhibit F).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient  evidence
to  warrant  any  corrective  action.   After   thoroughly   reviewing   the
additional documentation  submitted  in  support  of  this  appeal  and  the
evidence of record, we  do  not  believe  the  applicant  has  overcome  the
rationale expressed in the previous decision.  Therefore,  we  do  not  find
the additional evidence presented is sufficient to compel  us  to  recommend
granting the relief sought on that basis.  In the  absence  of  evidence  to
the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  upon  which  to   recommend   favorable
consideration of the applicant’s request.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was  denied  without
a personal appearance; and the application will only  be  reconsidered  upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not  considered  with
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2003-
03364 in Executive Session on 6 January 2009, under the  provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
                 Ms. Audrey Y. Davis, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 March 2004,
      w/atchs.
   Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 2 September 2008, w/atchs.





                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2003-01997A

    Original file (BC-2003-01997A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. We took note of evidence found by the DVA indicating he was assigned to a unit that suffered a rocket...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00608A

    Original file (BC-2006-00608A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding her request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. On 27 Nov 06 and 2 May 07, the applicant’s requests for reconsideration of her application were denied because she did not provide evidence meeting the criteria for reconsideration. See Exhibits G and H. On 1 May 08, the applicant provided additional documentation through her Congressional...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03364

    Original file (BC-2003-03364.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They indicated there is no evidence the applicant was assigned to any unit which was awarded the PUC. An individual is only entitled to share in a unit award of the unit to which he/she is assigned during the unit award period. Therefore, since he was not assigned to any unit awarded the PUC, he is not eligible to share in the PUC awarded to other units.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00026-2

    Original file (BC-2007-00026-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 29 Mar 07. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit D. On 23 Oct 08, the applicant submitted a copy of a Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP) and an e-mail communiqué, and requested reconsideration (Exhibit E). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02214A

    Original file (BC-2003-02214A.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02214 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow his reenlistment into the Air Force. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01785-3

    Original file (BC-2004-01785-3.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 22 Nov 04, the Board considered and granted the applicant’s request to have her EPR closing 12 May 01, voided and removed from her records; and that she be provided supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant for all appropriate cycles beginning with cycle 02E5. For an accounting...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01230

    Original file (BC-2005-01230.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 November 2001, the Board considered applicant’s request to be awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions on 10 September 1972. There is no documentation in applicant’s military records to indicate that he was recommended for, or awarded, any decoration for heroism. Furthermore, there is no documentation in applicant’s military records, nor has he provided any, to indicate that he was recommended for, or awarded, any decoration for heroism.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618-2

    Original file (BC-2004-03618-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03618 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated Non- Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001 rather than 22 October 2004. The Board also notes the applicant did not perform any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01419

    Original file (BC-2008-01419.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01419 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, reflect award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02986

    Original file (BC-2008-02986.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02986 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). DPSIDR states that the applicant's units of assignment were not awarded the...