ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03364
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that he be
awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 10 March 2004.
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the
applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board,
see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.
In an application dated 2 September 2008, the applicant requests
reconsideration. He states the 8th Security Police Squadron was awarded
the PUC and was unintentionally omitted from the orders awarding the
decoration (Exhibit F).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence
to warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly reviewing the
additional documentation submitted in support of this appeal and the
evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the
rationale expressed in the previous decision. Therefore, we do not find
the additional evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend
granting the relief sought on that basis. In the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable
consideration of the applicant’s request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without
a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
03364 in Executive Session on 6 January 2009, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Ms. Audrey Y. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 March 2004,
w/atchs.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 2 September 2008, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2003-01997A
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. We took note of evidence found by the DVA indicating he was assigned to a unit that suffered a rocket...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00608A
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding her request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. On 27 Nov 06 and 2 May 07, the applicant’s requests for reconsideration of her application were denied because she did not provide evidence meeting the criteria for reconsideration. See Exhibits G and H. On 1 May 08, the applicant provided additional documentation through her Congressional...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03364
They indicated there is no evidence the applicant was assigned to any unit which was awarded the PUC. An individual is only entitled to share in a unit award of the unit to which he/she is assigned during the unit award period. Therefore, since he was not assigned to any unit awarded the PUC, he is not eligible to share in the PUC awarded to other units.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00026-2
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 29 Mar 07. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit D. On 23 Oct 08, the applicant submitted a copy of a Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP) and an e-mail communiqué, and requested reconsideration (Exhibit E). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02214A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02214 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow his reenlistment into the Air Force. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01785-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 22 Nov 04, the Board considered and granted the applicant’s request to have her EPR closing 12 May 01, voided and removed from her records; and that she be provided supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant for all appropriate cycles beginning with cycle 02E5. For an accounting...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01230
On 21 November 2001, the Board considered applicant’s request to be awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions on 10 September 1972. There is no documentation in applicant’s military records to indicate that he was recommended for, or awarded, any decoration for heroism. Furthermore, there is no documentation in applicant’s military records, nor has he provided any, to indicate that he was recommended for, or awarded, any decoration for heroism.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03618 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated Non- Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001 rather than 22 October 2004. The Board also notes the applicant did not perform any...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01419
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01419 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, reflect award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02986 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). DPSIDR states that the applicant's units of assignment were not awarded the...