ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02214
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to
allow his reenlistment into the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 8 October 2003, the Board considered applicant’s request that his
discharge be upgraded to honorable, his separation code be changed, and his
Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow his reenlistment
into the armed forces. The Board found insufficient evidence of an error
or injustice and denied the application. For an accounting of the facts
and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.
In an application, dated 13 August 2004, the applicant requests
reconsideration of his request to change his separation code and RE code
and provides additional documentation in the form of training and active
duty orders associated with his service in the Texas Army National Guard.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the additional
documentation submitted by applicant, we are still not persuaded that he
has been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant’s service in the
Army National Guard in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom is duly noted;
however, he has provided no evidence that his separation from the Air Force
was inappropriate or the assigned RE code was in error or unjust.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-02214
in Executive Session on 29 October 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 31 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. DD Form 149, dated 13 Aug 04, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-02214-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02214 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded, his narrative reason for separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority,” his separation code be changed, and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2B” to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02214
On 22 May 2003, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable and his RE Code and reason and authority for discharge be changed. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: He will always have a mark against him as long as his records remain unchanged. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2003-02214
On 22 May 2003, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable and his RE Code and reason and authority for discharge be changed. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant changing his RE code to “3K.” After careful review of the circumstances of the applicant’s discharge for misconduct, we found no evidence to indicate that his separation from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-01105A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01105 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His high year of tenure (HYT) be extended to allow him three additional years on active duty due to his selection for promotion to staff sergeant (SSgt) after the Board’s previous decision, which allowed him to test for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03287
In this respect, we note that at the time of the applicant’s enlistment in the Air Force Reserve, Delayed Enlistment Program, she listed Cedar Falls, Iowa, as her HOR. In view of this, and since she did pursue correction of this error in a timely manner following her enlistment in the Regular Air Force, we recommend her records be corrected to the extent indicated below. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00364a
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. In letters, dated 18 and 27 January 2004, applicant requests reconsideration of his request to have his discharge upgraded and provides additional documentation. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01941
A 9 February 2004 command-directed Mental Health Evaluation diagnosed the applicant’s conditions as alcohol abuse and personality disorder not otherwise specified with schizoid, obsessive compulsive and narcissistic personality traits, and recommended his administrative discharge for conditions that interfere with military service. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2000-03359-2a
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2000-03359 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of captain in 1945 upon separation from active duty or in 1950, after serving an additional five years in the Reserve. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-00872
However, should the AFBCMR determine the medical condition warrants a disability discharge with severance pay, the appropriate RE code would be “2Q - Personnel medically retired or discharged.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 23 January 2004 for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03384
A copy of the report was provided to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. By letter, dated 29 January 2007, it was requested that the applicant provide evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.