RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03605
INDEX CODE: 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or
career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP)
be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
It was her decision to leave the Air Force in 1999 because of her
pregnancy. As a security policeman and single parent, she did not want to
leave her child for four months out of the year. She did have a rough time
and went through depression while in the service. She was sent overseas as
a first term airman, and was not emotionally ready. She would like the
opportunity to serve her country again. When she served overseas she got a
taste of the “real world” and knows that she is more than ready to help do
her part for her country.
In support of her request, applicant provides a personal statement, and a
copy of letter to a member of Congress. The applicant’s complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 October 1997. She was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3), having
assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 22 February 1999.
A medical narrative summary report completed on 25 October 1999 by an Air
Force psychiatrist identified the applicant as a previously admitted
patient on 28 April 1999 for one week who presents after 1 ½ weeks of
worsening depressive symptoms, decreased sleep, decreased interest,
increased interpersonal sensitivity, decreased energy and decreased
concentration. Her Axis I diagnosis was major depressive episode, Axis II
was probably cluster B personality disorder, and Axis III was intrauterine
pregnancy approximately three months.
Applicant’s record does not contain a discharge case file or the
commander’s denial of applicant’s reenlistment.
Applicant was honorably discharged on 18 June 1999, after serving 1 year, 6
months, and 27 days on active duty. An RE code 2X and a separation code of
KDF (Pregnancy or Childbirth) was assigned.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that the
applicant was denied reenlistment via early consideration under SRP.
Although there is no evidence of disciplinary problems in her record, the
RE Code 2X was reasonably assessed. DPPAE further states that she has not
satisfactorily indicated the commander’s action to deny reenlistment was
inappropriate or not in compliance with Air Force policy. The DPPAE
evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 January 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was sent to the
applicant for review and comment. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant a change to her RE code.
We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility that the RE code which was assigned at the time of
her separation accurately reflects her circumstances at the time of her
separation and evidence has not been provided that would lead us to believe
otherwise. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to indicating that the
information contained in her records is erroneous or that her commander
abused his discretionary authority when he nonselected her for
reenlistment, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 11 June 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Oct 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Dec 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jan 03.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02023 INDEX CODE: 110.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may enlist in the Air Force Reserves. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 8 Oct 02. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Oct 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02857
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02857 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment code (RE) be changed to allow her to join the Air Force Reserve. The applicant’s commander notified her on 6 July 1989, that he was not recommending her for promotion because she received an Article...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01981
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01981 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Additionally, she provided no facts warranting a change...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00369
As of this date, this office has received no response. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02572 INDEX CODE: 100.03 HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed so that he may reenlist. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02067
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 March 1991, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years. An RE code 2X (First-term airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) was assigned. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007- 02067 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00553
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She voluntarily separated from the military under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program and received an honorable discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 April 2008. The Air Force office of primary responsibility (AFPC/DPSOA) notes that AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, provides commanders Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) selection or nonselection...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02352 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed to reflect a code that would make him eligible for reserve status in the Air Force Reserve or Air National Guard. This is evident by his serving as a correctional officer...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00432
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00432 INDEX NUMBER: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 AUGUST 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to a code that will permit reentry into the military. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04091
On 16 April 1998, the applicant was offered nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for failure to go at the time prescribed to his place of duty on 3 and 10 April 1998. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant provided documents from a civilian sleep lab indicating he was diagnosed with severe sleep apnea during a sleep evaluation performed on 13 March 2002, over two years after his discharge. We find no evidence of error in this...