Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01342
Original file (BC-2007-01342.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-01342
            INDEX CODE:  110.02
                       COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  4 NOV 2008


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her narrative reason for separation be changed.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was not attempting  to  gain  a  new  depression  status  but  was
discharged because basic training was too difficult.

In support of her application the applicant provided excerpts from her
military personnel record regarding her diagnosis and discharge.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic  on
10 April 2007, for a term of 4 years.  On 20 April 2007, her commander
notified her he was recommending she be discharged from the Air  Force
for fraudulent entry.  The basis for  the  commander’s  recommendation
was that during her mental health evaluation, she disclosed a  history
of mental health treatment that she failed to document on her DD  Form
2807-1, (Report of Medical History).  Additionally,  during  a  mental
health evaluation, she was found to be a distressed young woman with a
strong desire to separate from  the  Air  Force.   She  indicated  her
symptoms of  depression  had  increased  since  she  discontinued  her
medication and she was motivated for a discharge.

She acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge, and  waived
her rights to consult with legal counsel and submit statements in  her
own behalf.  The base legal office reviewed  the  case  and  found  it
legally sufficient to support separation and recommended the applicant
be separated from the service with  an  entry-level  separation.   The
discharge authority  approved  the  separation  and  directed  she  be
separated with an uncharacterized entry-level separation.

Applicant was separated on 25 April 2007, under the provisions  of AFI
36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airman (entry-level separation –
fraudulent entry into military service), with an uncharacterized entry-
level separation.  Since her enlistment was considered fraudulent  her
total active service was non-creditable.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states based on the documentation
on file in the master personnel records; the discharge was  consistent
with the procedural and  substantive  requirements  of  the  discharge
regulation.  The discharge was within the discretion of the  discharge
authority.  The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify  any
errors or injustices that occurred in the  discharge  processing,  nor
did she provide any facts warranting a change to her narrative  reason
for separation or her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code.

Airman  are  given  entry-level   separation/uncharacterized   service
characterization when separation is initiated in the  first  180  days
continuous active service.  The Department of Defense (DoD) determined
if a member served less than 180 days continuous  active  service,  it
would be unfair to the member and the service  to  characterize  their
limited service.  Therefore, her uncharacterized character of  service
is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions.

The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
27 July 2007, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,
this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  Evidence has not been  presented
which would lead us to believe that her  discharge  was  in  error  or
contrary to the governing Air Force instructions, which implement  the
law.  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale  as
the basis for our conclusion that  the  applicant  has  not  been  the
victim of an error or injustice.  In the absence of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2007-
01342 in Executive Session on 30 August 2007, under the provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
                 Mr. James L. Sommer, Member
                 Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 May 07, w/atch.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Memo, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 9 Jul 07.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jul 07.




      JAY H. JORDAN
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00643

    Original file (BC-2003-00643.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00643 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for discharge, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service, be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01708

    Original file (BC-2006-01708.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Mar 99. On 30 Mar 99, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend entry level separation for fraudulent entry, based on the applicant’s intentional concealment of a prior service medical condition which, if revealed, could have resulted in rejection of his enlistment. JAY H. JORDAN Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-01708 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00876

    Original file (BC-2007-00876.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 April 2007, for review and comment within 30 days. ____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected by deleting the words...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00808

    Original file (BC-2007-00808.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00808 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 SEPTEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C to 4C. On 23 Feb 07, applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation, by reason of “Personality Disorder,” and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02519

    Original file (BC-2005-02519.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 October 2003, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was recommending discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interfered with military service, specifically for mental disorders. Upon examination, she was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder and separation proceedings were thereafter initiated. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 4 October 2005,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9902331

    Original file (9902331.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Aug 99, the applicant was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of “Personality Disorder,” with an uncharacterized entry level separation, with separation code JFX. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and indicated that the applicant entered the Air Force on 21 Jul 99 and was separated three weeks later after being evaluated in the BAS following two ambulance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01594

    Original file (BC-2007-01594.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, the applicant provided no facts warranting a change in her character of service or narrative reason for separation. Rather, as indicated by the Air Force, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03120

    Original file (BC-2007-03120.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provided no facts warranting changing the narrative reason for separation to “fulfillment of service” or a change to her RE code. Therefore, her uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. The DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 26...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00098

    Original file (BC-2007-00098.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the remaining issue for consideration by the Board is the Narrative Reason for Separation _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: It was recommended that she be separated for a medical condition. On 30 March 2006, the applicant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend her for an entry-level separation for erroneous enlistment for the following reason: SF Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care dated 21 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02046

    Original file (BC-2005-02046.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02046 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 JAN 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) and separation codes be changed to allow him to reenlist in military service. On 7 April 2004, the applicant submitted an AF Form 31, Airman’s Request for...