RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02450
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation code of LBK (First-term, second-term or career airman
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective
Reenlistment Program (SRP)) and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code
be changed to one that would allow reenlistment.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was voluntarily released from active duty under a force-shaping
program. He would like to join the Air National Guard (ANG) and
continue his service.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and
his AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 April 2002 for a
term of four years. Consequently, his Date of Separation (DOS) was
calculated as 17 April 2006. On 23 March 2005 his supervisor
initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program
Consideration. His supervisor recommended he not be offered
reenlistment but rather, he be involuntarily discharged for a pattern
of misconduct. The commander agreed with the supervisor’s
recommendation and denied him reenlistment. On 25 March 2005, the
applicant acknowledged receipt of his commander’s recommendation and
indicated he did not intend to appeal the decision. He was honorably
discharged as part of a force shaping initiative in effect at the
time. He was discharged after having served for a total of 9 years
and 28 days of active service and was serving in the grade of senior
airman.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS contends based on the
documentation on file with the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
and his master personnel record (MPR), the separation was consistent
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
Further, DPPRS notes he did not submit or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred during his discharge processing nor has he
provided any facts that would warrant a change to his SPD and/or RE
code(s).
DPPRS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states he was discharged
because his commander did not recommend him for reenlistment. There
is no error injustice in this matter. Further, DPPAE recommends he
request a waiver of his RE code through the ANG or any other service
component enlisting authority.
DPPRS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
20 October 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. We noted the OPR’s recommendation he
apply for a waiver of his RE code with the service component he is
interested in serving with and encourage him to do the same.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-02450 in Executive Session on 29 November 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 4 Oct 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Oct 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00369
As of this date, this office has received no response. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02887
Based on the circumstances of his discharge, they found no evidence or injustice; therefore, applicant’s RE code is correct. HQ AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Nov 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00561
On 4 Oct 05, the applicant’s commander notified her via an AF Form 286A, “Notification of Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program Permanent Decertification/Disqualification Action,” he was concurring with the recommendation of the medical authority to permanently decertify her from the PRP. Air Force Form 418, dated 29 Sep 04, which indicates she was selected for reenlistment just 13 months prior to the AF Form 418 dated 28 Oct 05 denying her reenlistment. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01690
The applicant’s commander recommended she be discharged under the Force Shaping Program. At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE Code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005- 01690 in Executive Session on 10 November 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03244
The discharge authority approved the recommended separation and the applicant was honorably discharged on 21 Jul 80. The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days on 1 Dec 06. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02023 INDEX CODE: 110.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may enlist in the Air Force Reserves. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 8 Oct 02. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Oct 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02754
The following AF Forms 418, Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration, were on file in the master personnel record. She received an RE code of 2Y “A second-term or career airman considered but not selected for NCO status, or had vacated NCO status under AFR 39-13.” The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Oct 05, copies of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03392
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004- 03392 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 MAY 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 3K be changed to a more favorable 1-series RE code. To date, they have not received any additional documentation or had any contact...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02302
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The characterization of his discharge be upgraded from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable and the narrative reason for separation and reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to serve his country once again. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02801
His AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, specifies his correct SRB skills authorization as Zone C, Multiple 2.5. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 26 Sep 07, w/atchs.