Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01690
Original file (BC-2005-01690.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                        DOCKET  NUMBER:   BC-2005-
01690
                                             INDEX  CODE:   100.00,
110.00

                                             COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO



MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  24 NOVEMBER 2006


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from  “3K”  to  a
“1.”

__________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her conduct was not drastic enough to warrant 3K.  She did not  lie
to her commander as she was accused.

Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27  Jul  04,  for  a
period of six years in the grade of airman basic.

On  27  Sep  04,  applicant  was  eliminated  from   training   for
unsuitability/academic deficiency, based on  her  not  meeting  the
minimum academic standards for the training course.   The  Military
Training Flight commander recommended applicant not  be  reinstated
into the course at a later date and that she not be considered  for
further technical training.  The applicant’s commander  recommended
she be discharged under the Force Shaping Program.

Applicant’s master personnel record contains an  unsigned  AF  Form
31, Airman’s  Request  for  Early  Separation/Separation  Based  on
Change in Service Obligation, requesting to be separated under  the
Force Shaping Program II.  The commander of the Military  Personnel
Flight (MPF) approved the request for separation on 8 Oct 04.

On 14 Oct 04, applicant  received  an  uncharacterized  entry-level
separation, by reason of entry-level performance  or  conduct,  and
was issued an RE Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an entry-
level separation).  She served 2  months  and  18  days  of  active
military service.

Examiners Note:  On 15 May 05, applicant submitted  an  Application
for Correction of Military Records (DD Form  149)  requesting  that
her RE code “2C” be changed to “1.”  On 14 Jun 05,  HQ  AFPC/DPPRSP
administratively corrected applicant’s RE code on her DD  Form  214
from RE code 2C “Involuntarily Separated  with  an  Uncharacterized
Entry Level Separation,” to 3K “Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or  the
Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no
other reenlistment eligibility code  applies  or  is  appropriate.”
Her  Separation  Program  Designator  (SPD)  was  changed  to   JCC
(reduction in force).

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and  states,  in
part, the applicant requested to be discharged from the  Air  Force
under the Force Shaping Program.  Her request was approved  by  the
discharge authority on 8 Oct 04.

The reenlistment eligibility code of 3K makes applicant  ineligible
for immediate reenlistment (within 24 hours after separation),  but
she is eligible for  prior  service  enlistment  with  an  approved
waiver (provided she is otherwise qualified).

Applicant did not submit any evidence or  identify  any  errors  or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing.  She provided
no facts warranting a change to her reenlistment eligibility code.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at  Exhibit
C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 22 Sep 05, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was  forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.   At  the  time  a
member is separated from the Air Force, they are  furnished  an  RE
Code  predicated  upon  the  quality  of  their  service  and   the
circumstances of their separation.  The assigned code reflects  the
Air Force’s position  regarding  whether  or  not,  or  under  what
circumstances, the individual should be allowed to reenlist.  After
careful review of the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that
the assigned RE code is in error or unjust or that  an  upgrade  is
warranted.  Furthermore, we note that the  applicant’s  current  RE
code of 3K  is  a  code  that  can  be  waived  for  prior  service
enlistment consideration, provided she meets all other requirements
for  enlistment  under  an  existing  prior  service  program,  and
depending on the needs of the service.  In view of  the  foregoing,
and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
01690  in  Executive  Session  on  10  November  2005,  under   the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member
      Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Sep 05.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 21 Sep 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 05.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00406

    Original file (BC-2005-00406.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on documentation in the file, they found the discharge consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states she knows there was no error or nothing in the form of an injustice, but still requests her records be corrected (Exhibit E). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02909

    Original file (BC-2005-02909.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02909 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 MARCH 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from “3A” to a “1” to allow reentry into the active duty military. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02887

    Original file (BC-2006-02887.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the circumstances of his discharge, they found no evidence or injustice; therefore, applicant’s RE code is correct. HQ AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Nov 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03282

    Original file (BC-2002-03282.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant while in basic training began experiencing right ankle and lower extremity pain which interfered with her training. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily separated with an honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03452

    Original file (BC-2003-03452.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 May 03, applicant requested voluntary separation from the Air Force. After review, the Medical Consultant recommends denial and states she was medically disqualified from the air traffic control career field due to migraine headaches. Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002965

    Original file (0002965.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02965 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenter the Air Force. He requests additional information be provided concerning his discharge. A complete copy of this response is appended...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02690

    Original file (BC-2006-02690.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant acknowledged receipt and, after consulting counsel, submitted statements for the discharge authority’s review on 27 January 2005; however, the discharge authority directed her separation for unsatisfactory performance (failure to progress in on-the- job training) with an honorable characterization of service and applicant was subsequently separated on 11 February 2005. On 21 June 2005, the BCMR, via a Board majority vote, directed her records be changed to show an RE code of “3K”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01689

    Original file (BC-2003-01689.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01689 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to join the Armed Forces. In support of her request, the applicant submitted a personal statement, and a letter of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02379

    Original file (BC-2005-02379.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02379 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Feb 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01896

    Original file (BC-2005-01896.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01896 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 DECEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2C” to a “3” series to permit reentry into the military. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at...