Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01117
Original file (BC-2006-01117.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01117
            INDEX CODE:  106 .00
      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Oct 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His 2004 bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He wants to serve his country by joining the Army.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 Jun 00, and  was
assigned to F.E. Warren AFB, WY, as a security forces apprentice.

In a general court-martial on 16 May 02, he pled and was found  guilty
of stealing just over $6,000.00 through the unauthorized  transfer  of
funds from the checking account  of  his  uncle,  a  US  Marine  Corps
lieutenant colonel.  The lone military judge sentenced him to  a  BCD,
confinement for six months, and reduction from airman first  class  to
airman basic.  The sentence was approved except for the  BCD,  pending
completion of the appeal process.

According to AFLOA/JAJM  (Exhibit  C),  the  USAF  Court  of  Criminal
Appeals affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence on 26 Aug 03.
 The US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied  the  applicant’s
petition for grant of review on 17 Dec 03.

The applicant was separated with a BCD on 16 Mar 04 in  the  grade  of
airman basic after 3 years, 3 months, and 18 days of  active  service.
[Note:  The applicant states on  his  application  that  his  date  of
separation (DOS) was 16 Oct 02; the AFLOA/JAJM  advisory  indicates  a
DOS effective 17 Feb 04.  However, DD Form
214, AF Form 100 (Request & Authorization for Separation), and AF Form
330 (Records Transmittal/Request) all reflect a DOS of 16 Mar 04.]

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFLOA/JAJM recommends  the  application  be  denied.   They  note  the
application is untimely and  there  is  no  basis  for  upgrading  the
discharge.  The applicant’s BCD accurately reflects the  character  of
his service.  The maximum punishment authorized for the offense was  a
dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of  all  pay  and  allowances,  and
confinement for five years.  The sentence was well  within  the  legal
limits and a  fitting  punishment  for  the  offense  committed.   The
applicant failed to identify or present evidence of the  existence  of
any error or injustice related  to  his  court-martial  and  resulting
sentence.

A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 12 May 06 for review and comment within 30 days  (Exhibit
D).  As of this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We find  no  evidence  indicating
the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis  in  his
conviction by general court-martial and was a part of the sentence  of
the military court, was improper or exceeded the limitations set forth
in the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  Furthermore, because of  the
short duration since the applicant’s separation and the serious nature
of the offenses committed, we do not find  upgrading  the  applicant’s
BCD on the basis of clemency appropriate at this time.  In view of the
foregoing, and in the absence of sufficient evidence to the  contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 22 August 2006 under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Robert H. Altman, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
                 Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member

The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01117 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Apr 06.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 1 May 06.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 May 06.




                                   ROBERT H. ALTMAN
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02328

    Original file (BC-2006-02328.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02328 INDEX CODE: 105.01 COUNSEL: JOHN N. PAGE III HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated in appellate leave status to complete his General Court- Martial (GCM) appeal process from the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) to the Court of Appeals...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-02808

    Original file (BC-2006-02808.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSO evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPEP indicates that after review of the referral report, they are advising the Board to remove the comment "During this period, MSgt P--- was given 24 months hard labor, a reduction in grade for reviewing child pornography." A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2006-02328

    Original file (BC-2006-02328.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant did not petition the CAAF for review of his case within the statutory time period; as a result, the findings and sentence in his case became final and conclusive on 2 Feb 06. In an application to the Board, dated 11 Feb 09, the applicant submitted his present case.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01122

    Original file (BC-2008-01122.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01122 INDEX CODE: 111.02, 126.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, imposed on 13 Jan 06, be declared void and expunged from his records, and his rank of staff sergeant be restored. On 26 Jun 06, the applicant's commander vacated the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00526

    Original file (BC-2006-00526.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00526 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 106.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1989 bad conduct discharge (BCD) by special court-martial (SCM) be changed to a medical discharge [presumably with an honorable or general characterization of service]. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02720

    Original file (BC-2007-02720.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Instead he makes a broad assertion that because no member detailed to his court-martial was African-American, the convening authority improperly excluded African- Americans from consideration as members. Clearly, given the overwhelming evidence adduced at trial (including video of the applicant in the bank making a fraudulent transaction) and the applicant’s post-trial admission of guilt, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the absence of African-American court members was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01146

    Original file (BC-2006-01146.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01146 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCT 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He request clemency and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00707

    Original file (BC-2009-00707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00707 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Article 15, nonjudicial punishment (NJP), and all actions associated with the punishment be removed; she be reinstated to active duty with her original date of rank; and her reentry (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to return to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03842

    Original file (BC-2010-03842.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Specifically, the 24 Oct 05 action provides: “the sentence is approved, and except for the Dishonorable Discharge, will be executed.” The language deferring execution of the DD is required by the UCMJ, which requires a final judgment as to the legality of the proceedings before a sentence to death, dismissal, DD, or BCD can be executed. The applicant’s request should be denied as untimely as the alleged injustice, i.e. defective action by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00859

    Original file (BC 2014 00859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 Feb 08, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals found that the approved findings and sentence were correct in law and fact. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denying the applicant's request due to untimeliness or on its merits indicating the applicant offers no allegations of an error or injustice, but only that he has learned from his mistakes and does not want the discharge to hinder his future. We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization,...