RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00526
INDEX CODE: 110.02, 106.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Aug 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 1989 bad conduct discharge (BCD) by special court-martial (SCM) be
changed to a medical discharge [presumably with an honorable or
general characterization of service].
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His BCD was an error and should be set aside due to his mental
condition at the time. His medical records prove he had a personality
disorder that warrants setting aside the sentence and awarding him a
medical discharge.
In support of his request, applicant provided copies of military
medical entries and his DD Form 214. His complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 Sep 86 for a
period of six years. During the period in question, the applicant was
an airman first class assigned to the 363rd Equipment Maintenance
Squadron, Shaw AFB, SC, as a munitions systems specialist.
A 13 May 88 entry by Aeromedical Services at the Shaw AFB Hospital
found the applicant qualified for worldwide deployment.
A 9 Jun 88 medical entry indicates the commander directed an
evaluation due to the applicant’s hostile and aggressive behavior.
The Chief of the Mental Health Clinic (MHC) indicated a diagnosis of
personality disorder which did not warrant medical processing. On
20 Jun 88, the MHC Chief reported the applicant stated he had many
personal problems but denied strong homicidal tendencies, drug and
alcohol abuse. The Chief found the applicant’s cognitive ability
intact, without delusion/hallucination. Diagnosis was atypical
personality disorder.
On 30 Jun 88, in an SCM convened at Shaw AFB, the applicant pled
guilty to and was found guilty of the following charges: (1) two
specifications of failing to go to his appointed place of duty on or
about 9 and 10 Jun 88; (2) three specifications of disrespectful
language to a superior noncommissioned officer (NCO) on or about 9 Jun
88; and (3) one specification of being incapacitated for the proper
performance of his duties due to overindulgence of alcoholic beverages
on or about 9 Jun 88. The applicant was sentenced to a BCD, 45 days
of confinement, and reduction to airman basic.
The Air Force Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty
and the sentence without modification on 23 Sep 88.
On 11 Jan 89, after 2 years, 3 months, and 24 days of active service,
the applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic with a BCD
by SCM conviction.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, noting the applicant’s appeal was filed
more than 17 years after his discharge. JAJM explains the Board is
without authority to reverse, set aside, or otherwise expunge a court-
martial conviction that occurred on or after 5 May 50. During his
court martial, the applicant pleaded guilty to all charges. His
mental health evaluation states “his present condition does not
warrant medical intervention.” This evaluation as well as the
information now being presented by the applicant was contained in the
trial record from 1988 and was considered by the Trial Court. His
sentence was well within the legal limits and an appropriate
punishment for the offenses committed. There is no reason to exercise
clemency in this case as the applicant has identified no error or
injustice related to his prosecution or the sentence.
The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant contends the sentence in the SCM is erroneous because he
developed a mental disorder while on active duty. He asks for the SCM
to be changed on the basis of clemency.
A complete copy of applicant’s response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice to justify changing the
applicant’s BCD to a medical discharge, presumably with an honorable
or general characterization of service. The AFBCMR is without
authority to reduce, set aside, or otherwise expunge a court-martial
conviction that occurred on or after 5 May 1950. We may change a court-
martial sentence on the basis of clemency if circumstances warrant.
However, we find no evidence indicating the applicant’s service
characterization, which had its basis in his conviction by special
court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court,
was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Further, the applicant’s
mental health evaluation and documents related to his diagnosed
personality disorder were considered by the court and contained in the
trial record. Medical evaluation found the applicant’s cognitive
ability was intact, his mental condition did not render him unfit or
warrant medical intervention or disability processing, and he was
worldwide deployable. The applicant has not shown he was deprived of
any rights to which he was entitled or that his sentence was not
appropriate given his misconduct. In view of the foregoing, and in the
absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we are not compelled
to recommend granting the relief sought on the basis of either
clemency or merit.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 24 October 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-00526 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Feb 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 31 Aug 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Oct 06.
JAY H. JORDAN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00442
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his discharge and court-martial, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. A review of his factual explanation to the judge of why he believed he was guilty of all charges and specifications likewise illustrates that his current contentions that he is not guilty of those...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03093
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that a computed axial scan of the applicant’s head at the time of the accident was normal and an electroencephalogram performed 10 months later was normal, both objective evidence arguing against serious brain trauma or its residuals. The applicant has provided no persuasive evidence that he was denied due process or that the actions taken against him were inappropriate or unsupported by his own...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02328
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02328 INDEX CODE: 105.01 COUNSEL: JOHN N. PAGE III HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated in appellate leave status to complete his General Court- Martial (GCM) appeal process from the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) to the Court of Appeals...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03284
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03284 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00909
On 21 Mar 74, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment in the form of forfeiture of $50.00, 15 days of extra duty, and a reduction in grade from airman to airman basic suspended until 15 Sep 74, for disobeying a lawful order not to have visits of the opposite sex in dorm rooms from 2300 to 1000 hours, on or about 13 Mar 74. On 15 Oct 74, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment in the form of $100.00 forfeiture for disobeying a lawful order not to depart the team after lights out...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01754
The sanity board found that, at the time of the alleged offenses, the applicant did suffer from severe mental disorders, but was able to appreciate the nature and wrongfulness of his conduct. The BCMR Medical Consultants complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 Feb 11 for review and comment within 30 days. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01898
On 8 Jan 90, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals approved the findings of guilty and the sentence and the BCD was executed on 11 Jun 90. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denying the applicants request due to untimeliness or on its...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01229
The Board denied his case on 30 Aug 94. Additional details regarding the circumstances of the applicant’s BCD and the AFBCMR decision are provided at the military personnel record (Exhibit B) and the Record of Proceedings (ROP), dated 4 Nov 94 (Exhibit C). A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05889
On 25 Feb 02, applicant was informed that the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) denied his request to upgrade his discharge. A complete copy of the Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation(s) were forwarded to the applicant on 23 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). With regards to the applicants request to restore his ribbons and medals, we recommend no action be taken as no...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01117
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01117 INDEX CODE: 106 .00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Oct 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 2004 bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the application be...