RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01122
INDEX CODE: 111.02, 126.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, imposed on 13 Jan 06, be
declared void and expunged from his records, and his rank of staff
sergeant be restored.
By amendment, his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the
period 2 Oct 05 through 30 Jun 06 be declared void and removed from
his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was punished for infractions for which he was innocent and punished
too harshly for those that he was guilty of committing.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides an expanded
statement, supportive statements, copies of the Administrative
Discharge Board proceedings, his EPRs, and electronic mail (e-mail)
concerning his requests for corrective action.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 Aug 96 for a period
of four years, in the grade of airman basic.
On 29 Jun 04, the applicant, then a staff sergeant, was punished under
Article 15 for failure to go to his appointed place of duty; operating
a government-owned or leased vehicle while impaired by alcohol; and
being physically in control of a vehicle while drunk. The punishment
consisted of a reduction to the grade of senior airman, forfeiture of
$945.00 pay per month for two months, which would be remitted without
further action on 28 Dec 04, 45 days of extra duty, and a reprimand.
The applicant appealed the punishment but it was denied by the
appellate authority. On 27 Jul 04, the legal authority found the
nonjudicial proceedings under Article 15 were legally sufficient.
On 13 Jan 06, he received an Article 15 for being absent, without
authority, from a mandatory training briefing. The punishment
consisted of a suspended reduction to the grade of airman first class
through 12 Jul 06, at which time it would be remitted without further
action. On 26 Jun 06, the applicant's commander vacated the
applicant’s suspended reduction to the grade of airman first class
after determining he was derelict in the performance of his duties
when he failed to submit the proper leave request for the period 12
Jun 06 to 16 Jun 06.
Applicant's EPR profile follows:
PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION
27 Apr 98 5
27 Apr 99 5
27 Apr 00 5
27 Apr 01 5
27 Apr 02 5
27 Apr 03 5
1 Oct 03 5
1 Oct 04 4
1 Oct 05 3
* 30 Jun 06 1 (Referral)
* Contested report
Applicant was honorably discharged on 20 Oct 06 under the provisions
of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). He was
credited with 10 years, 1 month, and 23 days of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial indicating the applicant has not shown a
clear error or injustice. The two Article 15 punishments imposed were
appropriate and not unfairly harsh. Reduction in grade was an
authorized and commensurate punishment on both occasions. The second
reduction was suspended and would not have gone into effect if the
applicant had not violated the conditions of the suspension.
A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 22
Aug 08 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. We note the
applicant received the 13 Jan 06 Article 15 for being absent from a
mandatory training briefing, and the punishment included a suspended
reduction from the grade of senior airman to airman first class.
After determining the applicant had been derelict in the performance
of his duties by failing to submit a proper leave request, his
commander vacated the suspension. Subsequently, he received a
referral EPR closing 30 Jun 06 and was rendered ineligible for
promotion, as he had been tentatively selected for promotion to staff
sergeant. Normally, we would not be inclined to disturb the
discretionary judgments of commanding officers, who are closer to
events, absent a strong showing of abuse of that authority. However,
after a thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this case,
we believe sufficient doubt has been raised regarding the fairness of
the imposed punishment, as well as the resulting referral EPR and
promotion ineligibility. In our view, the imposed punishment was
unduly harsh for the offenses committed. Further, we believe the
applicant may have been the victim of a personality conflict that
existed between him and his supervisor. We note that prior to the
rater of the contested EPR becoming his supervisor, he had an
outstanding record of performance. However, during her tenure as his
supervisor, the evidence of record reveals a constant deterioration in
the applicant’s performance. Additionally, we note that during an
Administrative Discharge Board hearing, the board found the applicant
had not committed the majority of the offenses alleged against him,
and recommended his retention in the Air Force. In view of the above,
and to remove the possibility of an injustice, we are convinced any
doubt regarding this case should be resolved in favor of the
applicant. Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s records be
corrected to the extent set forth below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code
of Military Justice (UCMJ), imposed on 13 Jan 06, be declared void and
expunged from his records, and all rights, privileges, and property of
which he may have been deprived be restored.
b. The AF IMT 910, Enlisted Performance Report, rendered for
the period 2 Oct 05 through 30 Jun 06 be declared void and removed
from his records.
c. He was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant effective and
with a date of rank of 1 May 06.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2008-01122 in Executive Session on 16 July 2009, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Chair
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
Mr. Robert S. Jack II, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Mar 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 24 Jul 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Aug 08.
PATRICIA J. ZARODKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2008-01122
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), imposed on 13 Jan 06, be, and hereby
is, declared void and expunged from his records, and all rights,
privileges, and property of which he may have been deprived be
restored.
b. The AF IMT 910, Enlisted Performance Report, rendered
for the period 2 Oct 05 through 30 Jun 06 be, and hereby is, declared
void and removed from his records.
c. He was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant
effective and with a date of rank of 1 May 06.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
This document contains information which must be protected IAW AFI 33-
332 and
DoD Regulation 5400.11; Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended Applies, and it
is For Official UseOnly (FOUO).
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04401
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). After a thorough review of the available evidence, including the Board’s favorable consideration of two virtually identical appeals by individuals involved in the same incident for which the applicant received an Article 15, we believe sufficient doubt has been raised regarding the fairness and equity of the imposed punishment. Furthermore, since it appears the applicant’s referral EPR closing 17 Mar 06, which...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01841
For these acts, the applicant was punished by a reduction in grade to staff sergeant, with a date of rank of 7 Mar 07, and a reprimand. The applicant was rendered a referral EPR for the period 15 Aug 06 through 15 Mar 06 (sic), which included the following statements: During this period member indecently assaulted a female Airman for which he received an Article 15/demotion, and Vast potentialdemonstrated poor judgment unbecoming of an Air Force NCOconsider for promotion. On 18 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01092
The applicant was considered and tentatively selected for promotion to staff sergeant during the 09E5 promotion cycle and received the promotion sequence number 15155.0, which incremented on 1 Aug 10. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial and states that the applicant has not provided evidence of a clear error or injustice. They state that should the Board remove the applicants Article 15, the referral...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02759
She requests the Board review the evidence presented to determine the justice of her Article 15 punishment. The evidence of record indicates the applicant's commander determined that she had committed the alleged offense of driving under the influence of alcohol, resulting in her nonjudicial punishment under Article 15. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02987
His Article 15 received on 22 Apr 13 be set aside. A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE indicates no equity in the decision regarding the removal of the applicants Article 15, indicating AFLOA/JAJM has reviewed the case and found the Article 15 punishment legally sufficient, and recommended denial of the applicants request to have it set aside. Although, the commander was to only examine all the statements and other evidence upon which he would rely...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01169-2
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 18 May 06, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s above stated requests (Exhibit J). Prior to processing of the reconsideration, the applicant submitted an undated DD Form 149 with an attachment, dated 8 Oct 06, requesting reconsideration of his case and providing additional evidence (Exhibit L). Therefore, the request for a hearing is again not favorably...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03942
The complete DPTOS evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: With regard to his request to remove and void the EPRs from Aug 06 and Oct 07, the applicant states he cannot submit anything to the ERAB without having first corrected the Article 15, because the 07 EPR hinges solely on the decision regarding the Article 15. The applicant requests his EPR ending 5 Aug 06 be removed from his record. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03329
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The following information was extracted from the applicant’s submission, his military records, and the Air Force Office of Special Investigation (AFOSI) Report of Investigation (ROI) dated 21 May 02. He denied using controlled substances and, after further questioning, requested legal counsel. Because there is no evidence before us that the EPR would have been different without the first specification in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05071
The Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 7 Sep 10; LOC, dated 18 Feb 11; Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 28 Mar 11; LOC, dated 28 Mar 11; and LOC, dated 15 Jun 11 be removed from her official military personnel records. FINDING (As amended by AFGSC/IG): NOT SUBSTANTIATED The applicants commander removed the 18 Feb 11 LOR from the applicants military personnel records as a result of the substantiated finding of reprisal in the AFGSC/IG Report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01451
The IG conclusion was largely based upon its interpretation of the existing rules related to entitlement of CZTE; specifically, its interpretation of whether the temporary duty (TDY) assignments to Incirlik Air Base (AB), Turkey, were in direct support of Operation Northern Watch. Based on his application, dated 15 Feb 05, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) concluded the applicant was the victim of an error and injustice by the Air Combat Financial Services...