Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00338
Original file (BC-2006-00338.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-00338
            INDEX CODE: 107.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  COUNSEL:  NOT INDICATED

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  6 AUG 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he was  awarded  the  Southwest  Asia
Service Medal (SWASM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have been awarded the SWASM for serving in Jordan and  Japan
in support of Desert Shield/Desert Storm.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a  copy  of  his  DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release from Active Duty.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic  on
6 August 1987 for a term of four years.  He was released  from  active
duty with an Honorable Discharge on 27 November 1991, after completion
of service.  He served 4 years, 3 months and 22 days of  total  active
service.

His DD Form 214 reflects award of the National Defense  Service  Medal
and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal.

The SWASM is awarded to service  members  who  served  in  support  of
Operation Desert Shield, Desert Storm, or Desert  Calm  from  2 August
1990 through 30 November 1995.  In a TDY  capacity,  the  member  must
have served 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days in the  specified
areas.

_________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial and states after a thorough review of the
Applicant’s military record, that  office  is  unable  to  verify  his
entitlement to the SWASM for the period in question.

According to DPPPR, the applicant was on active duty from August  1987
through November 1991 and was assigned to Guam  for  two  years.   The
Defense Finance and Accounting Service was unable to verify  temporary
duty during the timeframe in question.

The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
10 March 2006 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice.  After a thorough review
of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, the
Board is not persuaded that  he  is  entitled  to  the  award  of  the
Southwest Asia Service Medal.   The  Board  did  not  find  persuasive
evidence that the applicant performed temporary duty in the  specified
area for 30 consecutive or 60 inconsecutive days, or that he flew as a
crewmember in one or more aerial flights directly supporting  military
operations in Southwest Asia.  Therefore, in the absence  of  evidence
to the contrary, the Board finds  no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence no considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2006-
00338 in Executive Session on 27 April 2006, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
                 Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member


The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Jan 06, w/atch.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 1 Mar 06.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Mar 06.



      RICHARD A. PETERSON
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03939

    Original file (BC-2002-03939.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03357 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She should have been awarded the SWASM after she served in Saudi Arabia during Desert...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900364

    Original file (9900364.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit B. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Jun 99, w/BCMR response. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 99-00364 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00846

    Original file (BC-2006-00846.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The SWASM should be added to his service record because he was deployed on 2 Aug 1990 for Desert Shield and was on active duty service during the awarding timeframe. His awards include the Air Force Training Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Short, the Air Force Longevity Service Award Ribbon, and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award. Nevertheless, the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | Bc-2006-03893

    Original file (Bc-2006-03893.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits excerpts from his military personnel records, a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and a copy of the criteria for the SWASM, KLM-SA, and KLS-K medals. DPPPR states after a thorough review of applicant’s military record and resources available, they were unable to verify applicant was in the area of eligibility in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. He provided an enlisted Performance Report...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02848

    Original file (BC-2006-02848.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Oct 06 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02619

    Original file (BC-2006-02619.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214. Although his performance reports list several deployments, none state that he served in the AOE and the statement contained on his DD Form 214 stating he served in support of ODS/S, is the standard statement contained on all members discharge certificates who served during ODS/S. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02010

    Original file (BC-2004-02010.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02010 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). In addition, the servicemember must be attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102588

    Original file (0102588.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we believe it is reasonable to assume that the applicant did perform service in direct support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100873

    Original file (0100873.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00873 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. While the applicant was unable to provide a copy of his travel orders for the period in question,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02577

    Original file (BC-2003-02577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it is noted the EPR for the period ending 3 June 1996 indicates he was deployed during Operation Southern Watch, for which the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was awarded, we believe that based on the time period he was deployed, it would appear he was deployed initially in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm thereby making him eligible for the SWASM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...