RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01194
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 October 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her record be corrected to show one year of satisfactory service from
her last 11 months and 21 days of Regular active duty service.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her last year of Regular active duty service equaled 345 days. Those
345 days should equate to 345 points towards a good retirement year,
as a good retirement year in the Air National Guard (ANG) is only 50
points.
In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided copies of her DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and
her point credit history.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 11 March 1981. She
served 9 years, 11 months, and 20 days on active duty. On 2 March
1991, she transferred to the Ohio ANG (OHANG) in the grade of staff
sergeant. She is currently serving in the OHANG in the grade of
master sergeant and has over 23 years of satisfactory service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial. DPP cites Air Reserve Personnel
Instruction (ARPCI) 36-3203, Computation of Creditable Service for
Reserve Retired Pay, wherein is stated for a person who returned to an
active status in the Reserve or Guard, the R/R date begins on the date
the person attained active status. As she enlisted in the OHANG on 2
March 1991, her R/R date is correct. For her last partial year of
Regular active duty, she was correctly credited with 11 months and 21
days of satisfactory service. A partial year of satisfactory service
was credited to her record because she was discharged before
completing a full R/R year. She did not incur an injustice. Merely
earning more than 50 points in the 11-month, 21-day time frame does
not automatically transform that time into one satisfactory year.
DPP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3
February 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-01194 in Executive Session on 28 March 2006, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 27 Jan 06.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 06.
JAY H. JORDAN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00777
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00777 INDEX NUMBER: 100.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 Sep 07 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record reflect she elected reduced coverage under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) effective 1 Sep 05, and is entitled to a $186.00 refund of premiums for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00542
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant, a Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt/E-8) with the OHANG, was involuntarily retired and transferred to the Retired Reserve on 2 March 2000 as a result of force downsizing. Since he was involuntarily retired, he was eligible for RTAP benefits: however, he was not entitled to any monetary benefit, only to retire early. As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00869
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She and another unit member contacted HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) in July 2006 and inquired as to whether or not her duty status needed to be altered on orders. DPP notes her statement that she was unable to perform IDT training on 13 August 2005 because the entire building was closed on that Saturday and training was not available. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00394
A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found her disqualified for further military service 5 years short of a 20-year retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Apr 04 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00705
For RYE 29 Dec 93, the applicant did not earn any points from Sep 93 through Dec 93, then after two consecutive satisfactory federal service years, the applicant received another unsatisfactory year, and did not earn points from Sep 96 through Dec 96. According to Air Force Manual 36-8001, para 2.2, “points may only be credited to the date a member actually performed the duty.” The applicant was credited with points and in the proper retirement years. Based on the evidence of record and...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02319
AFBCMR BC-2007-02319 INDEX CODE: 135.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00431
This audit also generates a letter to the member informing them the audit resulted in changing their R/R date. Instead, she completed the requirements in good faith based on the information she had at the time. We note the applicants contention that she was not notified of the change of her R/R date; however, her original assignment order noted in the remarks section that Your point history record has not been audited and your R&R date may change. Following the audit of her record,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04004
Because she was working under the assumption that her R/R date had changed to the date she started working as an ALO (11 August), her R/R year for 27 May 2006 to 26 May 2007 ended up being six (6) points shy of the 50 points required for a satisfactory year of service. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states she never received a copy of the Special Orders dated 12 Sep 06 in the mail or at her unit. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01517
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01517 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Four points be added to her Point Credit summary for the Retention/Retirement (R/R) year of 4 January 2005 to 3 January 2006. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 May 06, w/atchs. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03439
A member’s Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) is established from their Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) in accordance with Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 14507, which requires that a Line-of- the Air Force colonel, not selected for promotion to the grade of brigadier general, be separated not later than the first day of the month following completion of 30-years commissioned service. Although applicant contends he had a break in service from November 1982 to...