RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02363
INDEX NUMBER: 128.05
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 Jan 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The requirement for him to repay the unearned portion of the
enlistment bonus he received be waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Before he made the decision to apply for separation under the “Force
Reshaping Program,” he asked the representative at the military
personnel flight (MPF) on several occasions if he would have to repay
a part of his bonus. He was never given a conclusive answer, but
based on their positivity felt he did not have anything to worry
about. He believed he was further justified in believing repayment of
the bonus would not be a problem when nothing was deducted from his
final check and nothing about his bonus was mentioned at his final
separation meeting. It was six months later when he learned he was
expected to repay $2,725.79. He does not believe he should be
penalized because of a program the Government encouraged people to
take part in, especially if they are not going to be told everything
upfront.
The applicant discusses problems and frustration he had during his
time in the Air Force and how he ended up in an assignment he was not
happy with. He saw the “Force Shaping” program as the only way to get
out of the assignment. If he had known some of the things when he
made his decision to separate from the Air Force he knows now, he
probably would have not made the decision to separate. He didn’t
really want out of the Air Force, only the assignment he was in.
He feels he has already given above and beyond for his country by
serving the last three years in the Air Force.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 4 Dec 01 for a period of
six years and received an initial enlistment bonus of $6,000.00. The
applicant initialed acknowledgement on the AF Form 3008 that he
understood that should he voluntarily or involuntarily not complete
the term of obligated service for which the bonus was paid, or failed
to maintain qualification in the bonus Air Force Specialty, he might
be required to repay the unearned portion of the bonus. The applicant
applied for separation from the Air Force under the Air Force Force
Shaping Program. In connection with his application, the applicant
signed a “statement of understanding,” attachment 12 to his
application, which stated he understood that should he separate or
retire before completing the period of active duty he agreed to serve,
he would reimburse the Air Force for a percentage of the cost involved
unless otherwise specified in the Military Personnel Flight Memorandum
(MPFM) covering the program. The applicant was released from service
on 15 Jan 05 for miscellaneous/general reasons. According to
information provided by the applicant, he has been notified of
indebtedness to the Government in the amount of $2,725.79 for
repayment of the unearned portion of his enlistment bonus.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The
separations processing section verified the applicant’s application
under the Force Shaping program and that he signed a copy of MPFM 04-
25, Attachment 12, “Statement of Understanding.” By signing the
statement, the applicant acknowledged that any unearned portion of the
bonus he received was to be recouped.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9
Sep 05 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has
not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, the majority of the Board agrees with the opinion
and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, the majority of the Board finds no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
02363 in Executive Session on 19 October 2005, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to deny applicant’s request.
Mr. Peterson voted to grant the applicant’s requests but did not
desire to submit a minority report. The following documentary
evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jul 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPR, dated 7 Sep 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Sep 05.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
(AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX
I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members. A majority found that applicant
had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and
recommended the case be denied. I concur with that finding and their
conclusion that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their
recommendation that the application be denied.
Please advise the applicant accordingly.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03541
DFAS-POCC/DE states the applicant was discharged with an SPD code of MND. The applicant asserts that he was told by his officers that he would not have to repay his SEB when he voluntarily submitted a request for separation under the LADSC Waiver Program. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02810 INDEX CODE 128.10 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A pro-rated portion (approximately $666.67) of his original enlistment bonus be refunded. Information about PALACE CHASE is provided with the applicant’s military personnel records at Exhibit B. Recommend disapproval of his request...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02885
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03482
He was discharged for miscellaneous/general reasons on 10 Jan 05 and given a separation code of “KND.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Based on the documentation on file in the records, the applicant’s separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulations. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02095A
__________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Pursuant to the Board’s request, AFPC/DPPRS provided an information only evaluation of the applicant’s request for reconsideration of her case. AFPC/JA notes that this individual fell under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program. __________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 June 2006,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02095
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She previously filed a complaint with the Inspector General (IG) office at her base of assignment when she separated from the Air Force regarding the requirements for repayment of SRBs and has not received a response. Although the evidence indicates the policy was properly applied in her case, it appears she believes a class of Air Force personnel, i.e., those involuntarily separated for misconduct,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01504
JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXX, BC-2005-01504 I have carefully considered all the circumstances of this case and do not agree with the majority members that the applicant should not be relieved of the debt for the unearned portion of the initial enlistment bonus she received. In support of her request, the applicant submits a statement from...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00898
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00898 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) code of “JFF” be changed to one that would not require him to repay his enlistment bonus. On 9 Jul 03, the office of the Staff Judge Advocate found...