Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02188
Original file (BC-2005-02188.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02188
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

                                           HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  15 JAN 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect award of  the  Distinguished  Unit
Citation (DUC) and the Korean Service Medal with  two  Bronze  Service
Stars (KSM w/2 BSS).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214 did not reflect his DUC and his KSM  w/2BSS.   He  was
assigned to the 17th Bomb Wing and the 34th  Bomb  Squadron  and  they
were awarded the DUC and KSM.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant’s military records were destroyed in the 1973  fire  at  the
National Personnel Records Center (NPRC).

The available records revealed the applicant  served  on  active  duty
from 23 July 1951 through 22 July 1955.  The DD Form 214  reflects  he
was awarded the Korean Service Medal  (KSM),  United  Nations  Service
Medal (UNSM) and the National Defense Medal  (NDM)  and  that  he  was
assigned to the 28th Logistics Support Squadron.  He served four years
of active duty military service.

Special Order Number 67 dated 4 October 1954 awarded the applicant the
Good Conduct Medal (GCM) for the period 23 July 1951 through  22  July
1954.

On 21 April 2003, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA informed the applicant that a  review
of his military personnel record verified his entitlement to the NDSM,
KSM, and UNSM which are reflected on his DD Fm 214  and  it  was  also
determined he was entitled to the GCM and that his  records  would  be
corrected administratively to add the  medal  to  his  records.   They
further informed the applicant that his entitlement to the DUC w/2 BSS
could not be verified.

On 2 May 2003, a DD  Form  215  was  issued  adding  the  GCM  to  the
applicant’s DD Form 214.

On 23 March 2005, the Promotions, Evaluation and Recognition Division,
responded to a  request  the  applicant  had  submitted  to  the  NRPC
informing him that they were unable to verify his assignment in  Korea
and his eligibility to the DUC.  However, they were able to verify  he
was eligible for the Korean War Service Medal.

On 20 July 2005, a DD Fm 215 was issued adding the Republic  of  Korea
Korean War Service Medal to the applicant’s DD Fm 214.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR states the DUC is now the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).
 It is awarded to units of the Air Force for extraordinary heroism  in
the action against an armed enemy on or after  7 December  1941.   The
unit must have displayed gallantry, determination and espirt de  corps
as to set it apart from and above other  units  participating  in  the
same campaign.  The applicant’s reconstructed personnel records do not
reflect he was assigned to the 34th Bomb Squadron.  AFPC/DPPPR further
states they were unable to verify  his  unit  of  assignment  for  his
foreign service.  Although the  applicant  provided  documentation  he
wanted to use  as  evidence,  unfortunately  it  is  not  an  official
military document and cannot  be  used  in  support  of  his  request.
Therefore, they recommend the requested belief be denied.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation  and  states  although
his records were destroyed by fire he submitted three statements  from
individuals who served with him in the 34th Bomb  Squadron.   He  also
requests reconsideration of  using  the  Thunder  Birds  documents  to
verify his entitlement to these awards (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of an error or  an  injustice.   We  took  note  of  the
documentation the applicant provided in support  of  his  request  for
award of the PUC; however, the Board majority agrees with the  opinion
and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt  its  rationale  as  the
basis for their decision that the applicant has failed to sustain  his
burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.  Although
the applicant provided documentation in support of  his  request;  the
majority of the Board notes that the documentation he provided was not
a military document and there is no evidence in the available military
records to substantiate his request.  Therefore, in the absence of the
evidence to the contrary, the Board majority finds no compelling basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:

The majority of the panel finds  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-02188  in  Executive  Session  on  3  November  2005  under   the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                       Ms. Sue A. Lumpkins, Member
                       Mr. James L. Sommer, Member

By majority vote, the Board recommended denying the  application.  Mr.
Sommer voted to grant the relief requested  but  does  not  desire  to
submit a Minority Report.   The  following  documentary  evidence  was
considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Jul 05, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Avaialble Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 3 Aug 05.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Aug 05.
      Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 21 Aug 05.




                             RICHARD A. PETERSON
                             Panel Chair






MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
                                          FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY
RECORDS (AFBCMR)

SUBJECT:  AFBCMR Application of

      I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members.  The majority found that applicant
had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and
recommended the case be denied.  I concur with that finding and their
conclusion that relief is not warranted.  Accordingly, I accept their
recommendation that the application be denied.

      Please advise the applicant accordingly.




                       JOE G. LINEBERGER
                       Director
                       Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02393

    Original file (BC-2006-02393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ AFPC/DPPPR verified the applicant’s entitlement to the GCM w/BL, ROKPUC and his records will be corrected administratively to add the awards. The applicant did not provide any documentation to verify his entitlement to the PUC and the KSM w/1 SSS and 3 BSS. On 21 September 2006, the Board staff forwarded the applicant a corrected copy of the Air Force evaluation for his review and response.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02531

    Original file (BC-2005-02531.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not issued medals for his involvement in the Korean Conflict and the French Croix de Guerre was not awarded to him due to his being on rest and relaxation (R&R) at the time of issuance to the crew members. According to DPPPR, the applicant’s record was forwarded to the Office of Assignment on 25 September 2003 to confirm the applicant’s foreign military Service. We agree with the opinions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03787

    Original file (BC-2005-03787.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 19 May 2006, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). The Board majority notes evidence has not been provided and there is no documentation in the applicant’s military personnel record, which would substantiate that the recommendation for award of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01510

    Original file (BC-2005-01510.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 reflects award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 Bronze Service Stars, the National Defense Service Medal with one Bronze Service Star, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The Board notes the applicant’s records were administratively corrected to reflect award of the Korean Defense Service Medal for the time he served in Korea. The Board also notes no evidence has been provided indicating the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03928

    Original file (BC-2005-03928.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In reviewing the applicant’s military records no official documentation was found showing the applicant served in a branch of service awarding the Combat Action Ribbon. There was no evidence found to verify the applicant was awarded the Combat Action Ribbon, nor has he provided any documentation substantiating he was awarded the Combat Action Ribbon. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02487

    Original file (BC-2006-02487.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s record indicates he served Foreign Service in Korea from 14 Sep 54 to 29 Aug 55. The KSM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces for service in Korea, 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days from 27 Jun 50 to 27 Jul 54. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01371

    Original file (BC-2011-01371.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 is missing the GCM with three loops, UNSM, KSM with a Bronze Arrowhead and two BSSs, RKPUC, AFEM, VSM, AFCM, AM, PUC with three BOLCs, PH Medal, Senior Missile Badge, and Senior Air Crew Member Badge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and AFBCMR Medical Consultant, which are included at Exhibits C, D, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01949

    Original file (BC-2005-01949.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states upon completion of his last mission on 9 September 1944 only officers were awarded the DFC. The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 July 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. With respect to the issue of the DFC, the Board finds no supporting documentation in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02616

    Original file (BC-2005-02616.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02616 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 FEB 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests that his late father’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and a Bronze Service Star (BSS) for the Asiatic Pacific Campaign Medal. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02896

    Original file (BC-2005-02896.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 17 December 1952, as an airman basic (AB) for a period of four years. On 14 March 2006, a DD Form 215 was issued to add the GCM, Sharpshooter Badge, Aircrew Member Badge and Aircraft Loadmaster Course 1954 to the applicant’s DD Form 214. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...