RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01637
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXX JR. COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 DEC 2005
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-
term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment
under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a
code which will enable him to enlist in the Air National Guard.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to the Air Force Force-Shaping, he was honorably discharged,
but given an RE code that did not allow him to join the National
Guard. He believes that he is able and willing to be an asset in
the Guard if his code is changed.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
dated 15 Jan 05.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 Apr 02.
On or about 4 Feb 04, applicant used indecent language to the
airmen of a training squadron. For this offense, he received
Article 15 punishment. The punishment imposed consisted of a
suspended reduction in grade to airman, forfeiture of $350 per
month for two months, and 14 days of extra duty.
On 2 Nov 04, applicant’s commander non-recommended him for
reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program, due to
significant problems with on-duty behavior unbecoming an Air Force
member.
On 15 Jan 05, applicant was honorably discharged under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of completion of required
active service, and was issued an RE code of 2X. He was credited
with 2 years, 9 months, and 7 days of active duty service.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and recommended denial.
They conducted a review of the personnel record and found nothing
to support the change requested. Applicant’s commander as the
authority on recommendations for reenlistment or nonreenlistment of
squadron members, recommended on AF Form 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program Consideration, nonreenlistment of this
applicant.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPR recommended disapproval of changing the RE code
stating, in part, that the RE code of 2X is valid and should remain
in the system.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
on 24 Jun 05 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, we are not persuaded that he
has been the victim of an error or injustice. At the time members
are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code
predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances
of their separation. Applicant’s RE code of 2X accurately reflects
that he was considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). After a thorough review of
the evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in
accordance with the governing instruction. In the absence of
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-01637 in Executive Session on 11 August 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Vice Chair
Ms. Sue A. Lumpkins, Member
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 May 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPR, dated 16 Jun 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 20 Jun 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jun 05.
MARILYN M. THOMAS
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03778
In accordance with the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, the applicant was honorably discharged on 27 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that since the applicant was discharged under the DOS Rollback Program and was serving on the Control Roster, his separation code of JBK...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01726
DPPRS notes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his separation or RE code. DPPRS states a Records Transmittal Request on file indicates applicant submitted an Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation; however, the request is not on file in the applicant’s master personnel records. At the time members are...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01989
A resume of applicant’s available enlisted performance reports (EPR) profile follows: PERIOD CLOSING OVERALL EVALUATION 10 Nov 91 4 23 Dec 92 4 23 Dec 93 4 15 Aug 94 2 (Referral Rpt) 15 Aug 95 2 (Referral Rpt) On 14 Feb 96, applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of completion of required active service, and was issued an RE code of 2X. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00561
On 4 Oct 05, the applicant’s commander notified her via an AF Form 286A, “Notification of Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program Permanent Decertification/Disqualification Action,” he was concurring with the recommendation of the medical authority to permanently decertify her from the PRP. Air Force Form 418, dated 29 Sep 04, which indicates she was selected for reenlistment just 13 months prior to the AF Form 418 dated 28 Oct 05 denying her reenlistment. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03469
Applicant’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) profile follows: PERIOD ENDING OVERALL PROMOTION EVALUATION 29 Mar 99 4 01 Nov 99 4 01 Nov 00 3 AF Form 418 (Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration), dated 1 Feb 01, reflects the applicant’s supervisor did not recommend her for reenlistment, stating the member has insisted she is not capable of performing the Life Support duties that are required of her. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00339
Under current provisions, AFI-36-2606, Reenlistment in the Air Force, a “2P” RE code is used to identify personnel “absent without leave; deserter or dropped from rolls.” However, there is no need to change her RE Code, because it was properly assessed under current provisions at the time. We note that the applicant was discharged from the Air Force for “marginal performance.” The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that she should have received an RE code that would allow her...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01110
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01110 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Oct 06 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting his records be corrected to reflect that he was released from active duty rather than discharged and that his reenlistment eligibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02492 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 FEB 2009 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility code of 2X [first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)] be...